journal article·2015Open access

The role of the domain size and titanium dopant in nanocrystalline hematite thin films for water photolysis

Danhua Yan, Jing Tao, Kim Kisslinger, Jiajie Cen, Qiyuan Wu, Alexander Orlov, Mingzhao Liu

Nanoscale· Volume 7· Issue 44

Abstract

Here we develop a novel technique for preparing high quality Ti-doped hematite thin films for photoelectrochemical (PEC) water splitting, through sputtering deposition of metallic iron films from an iron target embedded with titanium (dopants) pellets, followed by a thermal oxidation step that turns the metal films into doped hematite. It is found that the hematite domain size can be tuned from ∼10 nm to over 100 nm by adjusting the sputtering atmosphere from more oxidative to mostly inert. The better crystallinity at a larger domain size ensures excellent PEC water splitting performance, leading to record high photocurrent from pure planar hematite thin films on FTO substrates. Titanium doping further enhances the PEC performance of hematite photoanodes. The photocurrent is improved by 50%, with a titanium dopant concentration as low as 0.5 atom%. It is also found that the role of the titanium dopant in improving the PEC performance is not apparently related to the films' electrical conductivity which had been widely believed, but is more likely due to the passivation of surface defects by the titanium dopants.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Iron oxide chemistry and applications · Clay minerals and soil interactions · Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Center for Functional Nanomaterials

Brookhaven National Laboratory

Upton, USA

Department of Materials Science and Engineering

Stony Brook University

Condensed Matter Physics and Materials Science Department

Stony Brook, USA

Funding

Basic Energy Sciences

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. Fujishima · Nature · 1972 · 238 · 3710.1038/238037a0 ↗
2. Gratzel · Nature · 2001 · 414 · 33810.1038/35104607 ↗
3. Walter · Chem. Rev. · 2010 · 110 · 644610.1021/cr1002326 ↗
4. Sivula · ChemSusChem · 2011 · 4 · 43210.1002/cssc.201000416 ↗
5. Cesar · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2009 · 113 · 77210.1021/jp809060p ↗
6. Joly · J. Appl. Phys. · 2006 · 9910.1063/1.2177426 ↗
7. Marusak · J. Phys. Chem. Solids · 1980 · 41 · 98110.1016/0022-3697(80)90105-5 ↗
8. Meng · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 98 · 11210410.1063/1.3567766 ↗
9. Toussaint · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2014 · 119 · 164210.1021/jp5091476 ↗
10. Glasscock · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2007 · 111 · 1647710.1021/jp074556l ↗
11. Hu · Chem. Mater. · 2008 · 20 · 380310.1021/cm800144q ↗
12. Jang · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2009 · 113 · 671910.1021/jp8109429 ↗
13. Kay · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2006 · 128 · 1571410.1021/ja064380l ↗
14. Kleiman-Shwarsctein · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2008 · 112 · 1590010.1021/jp803775j ↗
15. Kumari · Curr. Sci. · 2006 · 91 · 1062
16. Liang · Int. J. Photoenergy · 2008 · 200810.1155/2008/739864 ↗
17. Sartoretti · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2005 · 109 · 1368510.1021/jp051546g ↗
18. Annamalai · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2015 · 119 · 381010.1021/jp512189c ↗
19. Deng · J. Appl. Phys. · 2012 · 112
20. Mirbagheri · ACS Catal. · 2014 · 4 · 200610.1021/cs500372v ↗
21. Tang · J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 110 · 12351110.1063/1.3671414 ↗
22. Wang · Nano Lett. · 2011 · 11 · 350310.1021/nl202316j ↗
23. Hahn · Chem. Mater. · 2010 · 22 · 647410.1021/cm1026078 ↗
24. Cesar · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2006 · 128 · 458210.1021/ja060292p ↗
25. Kumari · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2010 · 35 · 398510.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.01.101 ↗
26. Grätzel · J. Photochem. Photobiol., C · 2003 · 4 · 14510.1016/S1389-5567(03)00026-1 ↗
27. Du · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2014 · 118 · 1705410.1021/jp5006346 ↗
28. Lin · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2011 · 133 · 239810.1021/ja110741z ↗
29. Yang · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2014 · 6 · 1200510.1021/am500948t ↗
30. Zandi · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2013 · 6 · 63410.1039/C2EE23620F ↗
31. Atabaev · Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process. · 2015 · 118 · 153910.1007/s00339-014-8937-7 ↗
32. Ellmer · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2000 · 33 · R1710.1088/0022-3727/33/4/201 ↗
33. Glasscock · Thin Solid Films · 2008 · 516 · 171610.1016/j.tsf.2007.05.020 ↗
34. Kment · Appl. Catal., B · 2015 · 165 · 34410.1016/j.apcatb.2014.10.015 ↗
35. Slattery · Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. · 1995 · 34 · 340510.1021/ie00037a028 ↗
36. Bora · Curr. Appl. Phys. · 2012 · 12 · 81710.1016/j.cap.2011.11.013 ↗
37. Kim · Sci. Rep. · 2013 · 3 · 268110.1038/srep02681 ↗
38. Phuan · Mater. Res. Bull · 2015 · 69 · 7110.1016/j.materresbull.2014.12.059 ↗
39. Card · IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 1977 · 24 · 39710.1109/T-ED.1977.18747 ↗
40. Seager · J. Appl. Phys. · 1981 · 52 · 396010.1063/1.329202 ↗
41. Klahr · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2011 · 115 · 839310.1021/jp200197d ↗
42. Lopes · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2014 · 16 · 1651510.1039/C3CP55473B ↗
43. Souza · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2009 · 11 · 121510.1039/b811946e ↗
44. Deng · ACS Nano · 2015 · 9 · 534810.1021/acsnano.5b01028 ↗
45. Morin · Phys. Rev. · 1954 · 96 · 2810.1103/PhysRev.96.28 ↗
46. Liu · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2013 · 117 · 1339610.1021/jp404032p ↗