journal article·2018

Analysis of optimal crosslink density and platelet size insensitivity in graphene-based artificial nacres

Kaijin Wu, Zhaoqiang Song, Linghui He, Yong Ni

Nanoscale· Volume 10· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

Exploration of graphene-based artificial nacres with excellent mechanical properties demonstrates the potential to surpass natural nacre. Recent experimental studies report that optimal crosslink density defined as concentration of the surface functional groups is usually observed in these artificial nacres towards superb mechanical performance. A hybrid model integrating a nonlinear shear-lag model and atomistic simulations reveals the emergence of an optimal crosslink density at which the maximum strength and toughness are achieved. The origin is due to the balance among the reduction of in-plane tensile properties of the graphene sheets, the enhancement of the shear strength of the interlayer and the reduction of interface plasticity. In addition, our results also reveal that the size insensitivity of the graphene sheet appears when the shear stress of the interlayer is highly localized, the increase of the crosslink density intensifies the nonuniformity of the shear stress and the optimal mechanical properties of the artificial nacre cannot be further enhanced by tuning the size of the graphene sheets. Three kinds of interface molecular interactions with their optimal crosslink densities are also proposed to simultaneously maximize the strength and toughness of graphene-based artificial nacres.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition · Laser-Ablation Synthesis of Nanoparticles · Pickering emulsions and particle stabilization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Modern Mechanics

CAS Key Laboratory of Mechanical Behavior and Design of Materials

University of Science and Technology of China

Hefei

China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. Tang · Nat. Mater. · 2003 · 2 · 41310.1038/nmat906 ↗
2. Lee · Science · 2008 · 321 · 38510.1126/science.1157996 ↗
3. Cheng · ACS Nano · 2015 · 9 · 223110.1021/acsnano.5b01126 ↗
4. Li · Adv. Mater. · 2012 · 24 · 342610.1002/adma.201200452 ↗
5. Stankovich · Nature · 2006 · 442 · 28210.1038/nature04969 ↗
6. Zhang · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2016 · 45 · 237810.1039/C5CS00258C ↗
7. An · Adv. Mater. · 2011 · 23 · 384210.1002/adma.201101544 ↗
8. Bekyarova · Acc. Chem. Res. · 2012 · 46 · 6510.1021/ar300177q ↗
9. Compton · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 200810.1021/nn202928w ↗
10. Medhekar · ACS Nano · 2010 · 4 · 230010.1021/nn901934u ↗
11. Park · ACS Nano · 2008 · 2 · 57210.1021/nn700349a ↗
12. Song · Carbon · 2017 · 111 · 80710.1016/j.carbon.2016.10.067 ↗
13. Gong · Adv. Mater. · 2010 · 22 · 269410.1002/adma.200904264 ↗
14. Young · Compos. Sci. Technol. · 2012 · 72 · 145910.1016/j.compscitech.2012.05.005 ↗
15. Gao · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 213410.1021/nn103331x ↗
16. Hartmann · Nano Lett. · 2009 · 9 · 360310.1021/nl901816s ↗
17. Liu · J. Mater. Chem. · 2011 · 21 · 670710.1039/c1jm10300h ↗
18. Liu · J. Mech. Phys. Solids · 2014 · 70 · 3010.1016/j.jmps.2014.05.006 ↗
19. Liu · J. Mech. Phys. Solids · 2012 · 60 · 59110.1016/j.jmps.2012.01.002 ↗
20. Jäger · Biophys. J. · 2000 · 79 · 173710.1016/S0006-3495(00)76426-5 ↗
21. Gao · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2003 · 100 · 559710.1073/pnas.0631609100 ↗
22. Wan · Nanoscale · 2016 · 8 · 564910.1039/C6NR00562D ↗
23. Chen · ACS Nano · 2016 · 10 · 481610.1021/acsnano.6b01752 ↗
24. Zhang · Adv. Mater. · 2016 · 28 · 283410.1002/adma.201506074 ↗
25. Trevethan · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2013 · 111 · 09550110.1103/PhysRevLett.111.095501 ↗
26. Dimiev · ACS Nano · 2014 · 8 · 306010.1021/nn500606a ↗
27. Faucett · Carbon · 2015 · 95 · 106910.1016/j.carbon.2015.09.025 ↗
28. Jin · Acta Mater. · 2013 · 61 · 646610.1016/j.actamat.2013.07.025 ↗
29. Li · Adv. Mater. · 2012 · 24 · 342610.1002/adma.201200452 ↗
30. Salvetat · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1999 · 82 · 94410.1103/PhysRevLett.82.944 ↗
31. Gao · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2017 · 9 · 2483010.1021/acsami.7b04411 ↗
32. Vinod · Nano Lett. · 2016 · 16 · 112710.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04346 ↗
33. Xu · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2013 · 1 · 200210.1039/C2TA00176D ↗
34. Bonderer · Science · 2008 · 319 · 106910.1126/science.1148726 ↗
35. Barthelat · J. Mech. Phys. Solids · 2014 · 73 · 2210.1016/j.jmps.2014.08.008 ↗
36. Wei · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 233310.1021/nn204506d ↗
37. Cui · ACS Nano · 2014 · 8 · 951110.1021/nn503755c ↗
38. Wan · ACS Nano · 2015 · 9 · 983010.1021/acsnano.5b02902 ↗
39. Ni · J. Mech. Phys. Solids · 2015 · 81 · 4110.1016/j.jmps.2015.04.013 ↗
40. Xia · Nanoscale · 2016 · 8 · 645610.1039/C5NR08488A ↗
41. Wang · Comput. Mater. Sci. · 2012 · 54 · 23610.1016/j.commatsci.2011.10.032 ↗
42. Song · Extreme Mech. Lett. · 2016 · 6 · 8210.1016/j.eml.2015.12.010 ↗
43. Dewapriya · J. Appl. Mech. · 2014 · 81 · 08101010.1115/1.4027681 ↗
44. Chenoweth · J. Phys. Chem. A · 2008 · 112 · 104010.1021/jp709896w ↗
45. Song · Sci. Rep. · 2016 · 6 · 2372410.1038/srep23724 ↗
46. Lin · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 1070810.1021/nn303904z ↗