Real-time scattered light dark-field microscopic imaging of the dynamic degradation process of sodium dimethyldithiocarbamate
Source abstract
Abstract
Single nanoparticle analysis (SNA) technique with the aid of a dark-field microscopic imaging (iDFM) technique has attracted wide attention owing to its high sensitivity. Considering that the degradation of pesticides can bring about serious problems in food and the environment, and that the real-time monitoring of the dynamic degradation process of pesticides can help understand and define their degradation mechanisms, herein we real-time monitored the decomposition dynamics of sodium dimethyldithiocarbamate (NaDDC) under neutral and alkaline conditions by imaging single silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) under a dark-field microscope (DFM); the localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) scattering signals were measured at a single nanoparticle level. As a result, the chemical mechanism of the degradation of NaDDC under neutral and alkaline conditions was proposed, and the inhibition effects of metal ions including Zn(II) and Cu(II) were investigated in order to understand the decomposition process in different environments. It was found that Cu(II) forms the most stable complex with NaDDC with a stoichiometric ratio of 1 : 2, which greatly reduces the toxicity.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research · Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications · Biosensors and Analytical Detection
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Key Laboratory of Luminescent and Real-Time Analytical Chemistry (Southwest University)
Ministry of Education
College of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Southwest University
Chongqing 400716, P. R. China
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Haes · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2005 · 127 · 226410.1021/ja044087q ↗
2. Choi · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2009 · 4 · 74210.1038/nnano.2009.258 ↗
3. Hu · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2015 · 7 · 187410.1021/am5076293 ↗
4. Chen · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2015 · 137 · 190310.1021/ja5112628 ↗
5. Zhang · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2011 · 50 · 678910.1002/anie.201102151 ↗
6. Wu · Anal. Chem. · 2006 · 78 · 557010.1021/ac0603577 ↗
7. Huang · Anal. Chem. · 1996 · 68 · 225910.1021/ac9511105 ↗
8. Liu · ACS Nano · 2013 · 7 · 1102610.1021/nn404694e ↗
9. Shi · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2013 · 52 · 601110.1002/anie.201301930 ↗
10. Yang · Analyst · 2014 · 139 · 278310.1039/C4AN00353E ↗
11. Xie · Nanoscale · 2015 · 7 · 51110.1039/C4NR05080K ↗
12. Singh · J. Hazard. Mater. · 2015 · 291 · 10210.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.02.053 ↗
13. Pimentel · Environ. Dev. Sustain. · 2012 · 14 · 110.1007/s10668-011-9325-5 ↗
14. Emery · Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. · 2014 · 21 · 106210.1080/10807039.2014.953894 ↗
15. Zhan · Sci. Total Environ. · 2014 · 472 · 51710.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.11.022 ↗
16. Liu · Chem. Commun. · 2013 · 49 · 826210.1039/c3cc43605e ↗
17. Qu · Chem. Commun. · 2011 · 47 · 123710.1039/C0CC02752A ↗
18. Berciaud · Nano Lett. · 2005 · 5 · 51510.1021/nl050062t ↗
19. McFarland · Nano Lett. · 2003 · 3 · 105710.1021/nl034372s ↗
20. Luo · Nanoscale · 2015 · 7 · 69010.1039/C4NR05999A ↗
21. Tharmaraj · Analyst · 2014 · 139 · 630410.1039/C4AN01449A ↗
22. Goldman · Toxicol. Sci. · 2008 · 104 · 10710.1093/toxsci/kfn074 ↗
23. Aspila · Talanta · 1969 · 16 · 109910.1016/0039-9140(69)80149-9 ↗
24. Lopatecki · Can. J. Bot. · 1952 · 30 · 13110.1139/b52-011 ↗
25. Humeres · J. Org. Chem. · 1998 · 63 · 159810.1021/jo971869b ↗
26. Joris · Anal. Chem. · 1970 · 42 · 64710.1021/ac60288a004 ↗
27. Kulka · Can. J. Chem. · 1956 · 34 · 109310.1139/v56-142 ↗
28. Dekhuijzen · Nature · 1961 · 191 · 19810.1038/191198a0 ↗
29. Matlock · J. Hazard. Mater. · 2002 · 92 · 12910.1016/S0304-3894(01)00389-2 ↗
30. McFarland · Water Environ. Res. · 2012 · 84 · 208610.2175/106143012X13373575831277 ↗
31. Erven · Met. Finish. · 2001 · 99 · 810.1016/S0026-0576(01)81589-0 ↗
32. Mitch · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2004 · 38 · 144510.1021/es035025n ↗
33. Lee · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2005 · 39 · 210110.1021/es0488941 ↗
34. Yamase · Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. · 1970 · 43 · 93410.1246/bcsj.43.934 ↗
35. Cao · Anal. Methods · 2012 · 4 · 299610.1039/c2ay25235j ↗
36. Nitowski · J. Chromatogr., A · 1997 · 781 · 54110.1016/S0021-9673(97)00634-1 ↗
37. Smith · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2014 · 53 · 286710.1002/anie.201309307 ↗
38. Steinigeweg · Chem. Commun. · 2012 · 48 · 868210.1039/c2cc33850e ↗
39. Lilienfeld · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1930 · 52 · 88510.1021/ja01366a005 ↗
40. Zeng · Nano Lett. · 2011 · 11 · 301010.1021/nl2016448 ↗
41. Fang · ACS Nano · 2013 · 7 · 935410.1021/nn404042p ↗
42. Liu · Nanoscale · 2013 · 5 · 745810.1039/c3nr01952g ↗
43. Jain · Acc. Chem. Res. · 2008 · 41 · 157810.1021/ar7002804 ↗
44. Hao · Anal. Chem. · 2014 · 86 · 466310.1021/ac500376e ↗
45. Xiong · Nat. Commun. · 2013 · 4 · 170810.1038/ncomms2722 ↗
46. Nallathamby · Nanoscale · 2010 · 2 · 171510.1039/c0nr00303d ↗
47. Burda · Chem. Rev. · 2005 · 105 · 102510.1021/cr030063a ↗
48. Choi · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2012 · 134 · 1208310.1021/ja302684w ↗
49. Weissmahr · Environ. Toxicol. Chem. · 2000 · 19 · 82010.1002/etc.5620190406 ↗
50. Hallaway · Biochim. Biophys. Acta · 1959 · 36 · 310.1016/0006-3002(59)90199-4 ↗