Activated carbon adsorption enhanced removal of organic contaminants using a catalytic ceramic membrane with peroxymonosulfate activation
Source abstract
Abstract
Granular activated carbon (GAC) was respectively loaded into catalytic ceramic membrane channels (MG1) and connected at the rear end of the catalytic ceramic membrane (MG2) to improve the removal of emerging contaminants via peroxymonosulfate (PMS) activation. Compared to the catalytic ceramic membrane system (MCo-Mn/PMS) without GAC coupling, the MG1/PMS and MG2/PMS systems demonstrated complete bisphenol A (BPA) removal within 5 min, with total organic carbon (TOC) removal rates increasing to 66% and 73%, respectively, and exhibited exceptional stability. Quenching experiments revealed that the MG1/PMS and MG2/PMS systems involved hybrid radical pathways involving HVMO and SO4˙-. Liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry (LC-MS) analysis identified 6 and 5 transformation intermediates through two distinct pathways, respectively, indicating that the overall toxicity of the degradation intermediates was reduced, as confirmed by toxicity analysis. Fitting of the composite pollution model showed that the MCo-Mn/PMS system exhibited significant antifouling ability, and the membrane fouling mechanism was mainly based on intermediate standard blockage.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced oxidation water treatment · Membrane Separation Technologies · Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Environmental and Municipal Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266520, China
College of Environment, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, China
School of Liquor and Food Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
Funding
Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. Van Geluwe · Water Res. · 2011 · 45 · 355110.1016/j.watres.2011.04.016 ↗
2. Li · Chemosphere · 2023 · 327 · 13852810.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.138528 ↗
3. Lee · J. Membr. Sci. · 2013 · 432 · 9710.1016/j.memsci.2013.01.013 ↗
4. Wang · Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. · 2016 · 23 · 2377210.1007/s11356-016-7569-1 ↗
5. Ursino · Membranes · 2018 · 8 · 1810.3390/membranes8020018 ↗
6. Guo · Sci. Total Environ. · 2024 · 907 · 16779210.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167792 ↗
7. Furhacker · Chemosphere · 2000 · 41 · 75110.1016/S0045-6535(99)00466-X ↗
8. vom Saal · Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. · 2012 · 354 · 7410.1016/j.mce.2012.01.001 ↗
9. Cheng · Chem. Eng. J. · 2017 · 308 · 101010.1016/j.cej.2016.09.127 ↗
10. Ezugbe · Membranes · 2020 · 10 · 8910.3390/membranes10050089 ↗
11. Yuan · J. Hazard. Mater. · 2011 · 196 · 17310.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.09.007 ↗
12. Zhang · Appl. Sci. · 2023 · 13 · 318210.3390/app13053182 ↗
13. Medici · Molecules · 2024 · 29 · 223710.3390/molecules29102237 ↗
14. Wang · Water Res. · 2024 · 250 · 12105510.1016/j.watres.2023.121055 ↗
15. Yu · Water Res. · 2025 · 284 · 12399110.1016/j.watres.2025.123991 ↗
16. Pan · J. Water Process Eng. · 2025 · 74 · 10777010.1016/j.jwpe.2025.107770 ↗
17. Wu · Sep. Purif. Technol. · 2025 · 376 · 13406710.1016/j.seppur.2025.134067 ↗
18. Hossain · Results Eng. · 2024 · 24 · 10318310.1016/j.rineng.2024.103183 ↗
19. Wang · J. Membr. Sci. · 2025 · 732 · 12425010.1016/j.memsci.2025.124250 ↗
20. Zhao · Environ. Res. · 2025 · 282 · 12209710.1016/j.envres.2025.122097 ↗
21. Zhang · Sep. Purif. Technol. · 2024 · 328 · 12513510.1016/j.seppur.2023.125135 ↗
22. Nelson · Results Mater. · 2025 · 27 · 10075010.1016/j.rinma.2025.100750 ↗
23. Yin · J. Environ. Chem. Eng. · 2024 · 12 · 11310310.1016/j.jece.2024.113103 ↗
24. Santiago-Espiñeira · J. Environ. Manage. · 2025 · 388 · 12598310.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125983 ↗
25. Titchou · Chem. Eng. Process. · 2021 · 169 · 10863110.1016/j.cep.2021.108631 ↗
26. Nguyen · Water Res. · 2024 · 266 · 12253710.1016/j.watres.2024.122537 ↗
27. Wang · Chem. Eng. Sci. · 2025 · 301 · 12069810.1016/j.ces.2024.120698 ↗
28. Shin · Chemosphere · 2024 · 357 · 14202510.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.142025 ↗
29. Chen · RSC Adv. · 2017 · 7 · 92710.1039/C6RA25230C ↗
30. Lim · Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2011 · 41 · 117310.1080/10643380903488664 ↗
31. Liu · Appl. Catal., B · 2021 · 286 · 11992110.1016/j.apcatb.2021.119921 ↗
32. Wei · J. Hazard. Mater. · 2016 · 316 · 6010.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.05.031 ↗
33. Lei · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2023 · 57 · 543310.1021/acs.est.2c09338 ↗
34. Zhu · J. Alloys Compd. · 2022 · 924 · 16650010.1016/j.jallcom.2022.166500 ↗
35. Zhu · Chem. Eng. J. · 2020 · 384 · 12329810.1016/j.cej.2019.123298 ↗
36. Huang · J. Hazard. Mater. · 2009 · 167 · 41810.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.12.138 ↗
37. Du · J. Hazard. Mater. · 2016 · 320 · 15010.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.08.021 ↗
38. He · J. Cleaner Prod. · 2023 · 414 · 13757110.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137571 ↗
39. Gao · Nat. Synth. · 2025 · 4 · 8410.1038/s44160-024-00654-x ↗
40. Yu · Surf. Interfaces · 2024 · 54 · 10522210.1016/j.surfin.2024.105222 ↗
41. Meador · Environ. Pollut. · 2021 · 291 · 11820110.1016/j.envpol.2021.118201 ↗
42. Yu · Ceram. Int. · 2024 · 50 · 2952810.1016/j.ceramint.2024.05.248 ↗
43. Zhou · Chem. Eng. J. · 2023 · 451 · 13900910.1016/j.cej.2022.139009 ↗