High-throughput screening accelerated by machine learning for the morphology of silica nanoparticles with high cell permeability
Source abstract
Abstract
In recent years, silica nanoparticles have garnered tremendous attention as drug-delivery carriers. However, the cell permeability of nanoparticles remains a major obstacle that limits the drug-delivery efficiency of drug carriers. It is a common practice to regulate the low-dimensional characteristics of nanoparticles, such as charge and size, to promote their permeability. In addition, the morphology of nanoparticles has also been proven to be a significant influencing factor. However, it is still a challenge to screen the high-dimensional characteristics of nanoparticles to optimize cell permeability. Herein, we introduce a high-throughput screening framework accelerated by machine learning for determining the morphology of silica nanoparticles with high cell permeability. We found that icosahedral morphology, the common morphology of a virus, exhibits the best performance. The superior permeability of the icosahedral nanoparticles is attributed to their larger rotational freedom during the internalization process, which promotes the formation of pores in the cell membrane. These findings are expected to inspire the design of efficient drug-delivery nanocarriers.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Physics, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110036, P. R. China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Cao · Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. · 2023 · 115 · 115115
2. Vallet-Regí · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2022 · 51 · 536510.1039/D1CS00659B ↗
3. Zhou · Coord. Chem. Rev. · 2021 · 452 · 21430910.1016/j.ccr.2021.214309 ↗
4. Wilhelm · Nat. Rev. Mater. · 2016 · 1 · 1601410.1038/natrevmats.2016.14 ↗
5. Sun · Biomacromolecules · 2017 · 18 · 64910.1021/acs.biomac.6b01704 ↗
6. Wang · Acta Biomater. · 2021 · 134 · 548
7. McNamee · Biophys. J. · 2006 · 91 · 196010.1529/biophysj.106.082420 ↗
8. Möller · Nanoscale · 2016 · 8 · 400710.1039/C5NR06246B ↗
9. Xia · ACS Nano · 2009 · 3 · 327310.1021/nn900918w ↗
10. Perrault · Nano Lett. · 2009 · 9 · 190910.1021/nl900031y ↗
11. Liong · ACS Nano · 2008 · 2 · 88910.1021/nn800072t ↗
12. Bagheri · Nanoscale · 2016 · 8 · 1251010.1039/C5NR07853A ↗
13. Mousseau · Nanoscale · 2017 · 9 · 1496710.1039/C7NR04574C ↗
14. Bai · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2018 · 10 · 2036810.1021/acsami.8b06764 ↗
15. Wang · Acta Biomater. · 2021 · 92 · 7210.1016/j.actbio.2021.01.005 ↗
16. Mayor · Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. · 2007 · 8 · 60310.1038/nrm2216 ↗
17. Deamer · Chem. Phys. Lipids · 1986 · 40 · 16710.1016/0009-3084(86)90069-1 ↗
18. Janjua · Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. · 2023 · 203 · 11511510.1016/j.addr.2023.115115 ↗
19. Zhang · Nat. Commun. · 2019 · 10 · 410.1038/s41467-018-07885-5 ↗
20. Patel · ACS Nano · 2020 · 14 · 1727310.1021/acsnano.0c07298 ↗
21. Li · Nanoscale · 2020 · 12 · 1491110.1039/D0NR03234D ↗
22. Liu · ACS Nano · 2019 · 13 · 1022110.1021/acsnano.9b03434 ↗
23. Gupta · Nanoscale · 2020 · 12 · 631810.1039/C9NR09947F ↗
24. Forster · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2020 · 125 · 22810110.1103/PhysRevLett.125.228101 ↗
25. Yu · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2023 · 62 · e20221618810.1002/anie.202216188 ↗
26. Malekkhaiat Häffner · ACS Nano · 2021 · 15 · 678710.1021/acsnano.0c10378 ↗
27. Wang · ACS Cent. Sci. · 2017 · 3 · 83910.1021/acscentsci.7b00257 ↗
28. Souza · Nat. Methods · 2021 · 18 · 38210.1038/s41592-021-01098-3 ↗
29. Persson · SIAM Rev. · 2004 · 46 · 32910.1137/S0036144503429121 ↗
30. Pérez-Sánchez · Colloids Surf., A · 2023 · 660 · 13158310.1016/j.colsurfa.2023.131583 ↗
31. Empereur-Mot · J. Chem. Inf. Model. · 2023 · 63 · 382710.1021/acs.jcim.3c00530 ↗
32. Abraham · SoftwareX · 2015 · 1–2 · 1910.1016/j.softx.2015.06.001 ↗
33. Stukowski · Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2010 · 18 · 01501210.1088/0965-0393/18/1/015012 ↗
34. Zhang · Sci. Adv. · 2021 · 7 · eaba245810.1126/sciadv.aba2458 ↗
35. Li · ACS Nano · 2021 · 15 · 572510.1021/acsnano.1c01173 ↗
36. Chen · ACS Nano · 2024 · 18 · 646310.1021/acsnano.3c11982 ↗
37. Dane · Nat. Mater. · 2022 · 21 · 71010.1038/s41563-022-01251-z ↗
38. Su · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2017 · 8 · 3154
39. Yue · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 577810.1021/nn205125e ↗
40. Ou · ACS Nano · 2022 · 16 · 2152510.1021/acsnano.2c04774 ↗
41. Leroueil · Acc. Chem. Res. · 2007 · 40 · 33510.1021/ar600012y ↗
42. Chen · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2007 · 104 · 221110.1073/pnas.0610843104 ↗
43. Obataya · Nano Lett. · 2005 · 5 · 2710.1021/nl0485399 ↗
44. P. A.Vikhar , In 2016 International Conference on Global Trends in Signal Processing, Information Computing and Communication (ICGTSPICC), IEEE , 2017 , pp. 261265
45. Salley · Nat. Commun. · 2020 · 11 · 404910.1038/s41467-020-16501-4 ↗
46. Vaswani · Nat. Commun. · 2017 · 8 · 110.1038/s41467-016-0009-6 ↗
47. Nazemzadeh · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2023 · 127 · 110.1021/acs.jpcb.3c04405 ↗
48. Hsieh · Biomaterials · 2021 · 273 · 12074810.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.120748 ↗
49. Stetten · Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. · 2018 · 36 · 5810.1016/j.cocis.2018.01.001 ↗
50. Souza · Nat. Methods · 2021 · 18 · 38210.1038/s41592-021-01098-3 ↗