Insights into the copolymerization of metal–organic nanotubes from ligand mixtures using small angle neutron scattering
Source abstract
Abstract
Metal-organic nanotubes (MONTs) are porous, tunable 1D nanomaterials akin to metal-organic frameworks (MOFs). MONTs are synthesized via metal salts and coordinating ligands akin to MOFs, but crucially they are anisotropic, unlike most MOFs. Recently, MONTs have been shown to form statistically random copolymers; however, their mechanism of growth remains largely unexplored. Full realization of the potential of MONTs necessitates a thorough understanding of the mechanism of MONT growth. Herein, small-angle neutron scattering (SANS) was employed to investigate the copolymerization mechanism of two 1,2,4-ditriazole ligands and to quantify the inclusion of a solvent within the MONT pores. The results show parallelepiped-shaped structures are initially formed, which then aggregate to form larger lamellar structures. Additional experimentation with a deuterated ligand showed that the reactivities of all ligands are approximately equal, causing random ligand distribution within the resulting MONT. Finally, the results quantify the amount of solvent incorporated within the nanostructure pores at different stages of the formation process. These results show that early in the reaction the MONTs contain ca. 45% solvent, and they contain ca. 55% solvent late in the reaction when the MONTs are nearly fully formed.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Conducting polymers and applications · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Advancements in Battery Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA
Funding
University of Tennessee · Division of Materials Research · Basic Energy Sciences · Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Fu · TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. · 2023 · 163 · 11705210.1016/j.trac.2023.117052 ↗
2. Jia · Coord. Chem. Rev. · 2020 · 403 · 21308310.1016/j.ccr.2019.213083 ↗
3. Eddaoudi · Science · 2002 · 295 · 46910.1126/science.1067208 ↗
4. Deng · Science · 2010 · 327 · 84610.1126/science.1181761 ↗
5. Ashworth · Nanoscale · 2020 · 12 · 798610.1039/D0NR01009J ↗
6. Barrett · Chem. Sci. · 2023 · 14 · 100310.1039/D2SC06084A ↗
7. Dresselhaus · Mater. Sci. Eng., C · 2003 · 23 · 12910.1016/S0928-4931(02)00240-0 ↗
8. Vailonis · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2019 · 141(26) · 1017710.1021/jacs.9b04586 ↗
9. Zhao · J. Mater. Chem. C · 2020 · 8 · 445310.1039/C9TC05859A ↗
10. Lin · Nano Res. · 2021 · 14 · 38710.1007/s12274-020-2785-x ↗
11. Rani · ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. · 2022 · 10 · 698110.1021/acssuschemeng.2c00026 ↗
12. Murdock · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2014 · 136 · 1098310.1021/ja5042226 ↗
13. Baughman · Science · 2002 · 297 · 78710.1126/science.1060928 ↗
14. Dodson · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2020 · 142 · 2080610.1021/jacs.0c10224 ↗
15. Falcao · J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. · 2007 · 82 · 52410.1002/jctb.1693 ↗
16. Rosenmann · Inorg. Chem. · 2024 · 63 · 881610.1021/acs.inorgchem.4c00559 ↗
17. Shrestha · ACS Appl. Nano Mater. · 2020 · 3 · 560510.1021/acsanm.0c00857 ↗
18. Etampawala · Cryst. Growth Des. · 2016 · 16 · 139510.1021/acs.cgd.5b01509 ↗
19. B.Hammouda , Probing Nanoscale Structures – The SANS Toolbox , 2008
20. R. J.Roe , Methods of X-ray and neutron scattering in polymer science , in Topics in Polymer Science , Oxford University Press, Inc. , 2000
21. Nayuk · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2012 · 116 · 612710.1021/jp3003728 ↗
22. T. P.Lodge and P. C.Hiemenz , Polymer Chemistry , CRC Press , 202010.1201/9780429190810 ↗
23. Sears · Neutron News · 1992 · 3 · 2610.1080/10448639208218770 ↗