Spectroelectrochemistry with hydrogen-doped indium oxide electrodes monitors electron and hole injection into PbS quantum dots
Source abstract
Abstract
We combine potential-modulated absorption spectroscopy with working electrodes made of hydrogen-doped indium oxide on glass to study the electrochemically induced changes to the infrared absorption of ethanedithiol-crosslinked PbS quantum dot thin films. We demonstrate an electrochemical window of -1.5 V to 1 V vs. ferrocene/ferrocenium as well as a spectral window of 800 nm - 1900 nm, and we show how these ranges can be fine-tuned by tailoring the composition of the working electrode. We find evidence for the successful injection of electrons and holes into the quantum dots to a comparable degree. This enables us to locate the absolute positions of the band edges and the Fermi level for PbS quantum dots with different diameters, monitor how the band edge positions depend on the diameter and show a correlation between the position of the Fermi level with the appearance of in-gap states. We discuss the specific advantages of the technique presented here for monitoring the redox behaviour of IR-active quantum dots, detail the experimental challenges and devise strategies for their mitigation.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Electrochemical Analysis and Applications · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, University of Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 18, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics (WNLO), School of Optical and Electronic Information, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China
Funding
Heinrich Böll Stiftung · Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Weber · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2019 · 21 · 899210.1039/C9CP00301K ↗
2. Poppe · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2014 · 118 · 1712310.1021/jp5016092 ↗
3. Garoz-Ruiz · Isr. J. Chem. · 2019 · 59 · 67910.1002/ijch.201900028 ↗
4. Spittel · ACS Nano · 2017 · 11 · 1217410.1021/acsnano.7b05300 ↗
5. Boehme · ACS Nano · 2013 · 7 · 250010.1021/nn3058455 ↗
6. Geuchies · ACS Nano · 2021 · 15 · 37710.1021/acsnano.0c07365 ↗
7. Yu · Science · 2003 · 300 · 127710.1126/science.1084424 ↗
8. Gudjonsdottir · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2018 · 140 · 658210.1021/jacs.8b01347 ↗
9. Boehme · Nano Lett. · 2015 · 15 · 305610.1021/acs.nanolett.5b00050 ↗
10. van der Stam · Chem. Mater. · 2018 · 30 · 805210.1021/acs.chemmater.8b03893 ↗
11. Wurst · Small · 2023 · 19 · 220710110.1002/smll.202207101 ↗
12. Mulder · ACS Energy Lett. · 2021 · 6 · 251910.1021/acsenergylett.1c00970 ↗
13. van der Stam · ACS Nano · 2018 · 12 · 1124410.1021/acsnano.8b05843 ↗
14. van der Stam · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2017 · 139 · 1320810.1021/jacs.7b07788 ↗
15. Vogel · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2024 · 146 · 992810.1021/jacs.4c00402 ↗
16. Boehme · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2016 · 120 · 516410.1021/acs.jpcc.5b12016 ↗
17. Wehrenberg · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2003 · 125 · 780610.1021/ja035369d ↗
18. Lu · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2018 · 140 · 1375310.1021/jacs.8b07910 ↗
19. Yang · J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. · 2023 · 2510 · 012011
20. Ge · Small · 2022 · 18 · 220367710.1002/smll.202203677 ↗
21. Li · Nano Energy · 2024 · 129 · 11002310.1016/j.nanoen.2024.110023 ↗
22. Weidman · ACS Nano · 2014 · 8 · 636310.1021/nn5018654 ↗