Highly selective CO 2 electroreduction in an exsolution-induced flow cell using a hierarchical monolithic nano-Ag foam electrode
Source abstract
Abstract
Electrochemical CO2 reduction driven by renewable energy offers a promising route to carbon neutrality. The flow-through induced dynamic triple-phase boundary cell (FTDT cell) addresses the key challenges of conventional gas diffusion electrodes (GDEs), including salt precipitation and electrode flooding, by enabling direct electrolysis of CO2-saturated solutions. However, the Ag catalyst with carbon cloth as a substrate in the FTDT cell exhibits the shortcomings of a few active sites and poor structural stability. Here, we reported a monolithic nano-Ag foam electrode featuring well-developed pores and a hierarchical nanostructure with a high electrochemically active surface area (ECSA), which is ten times that of the Ag NPs electrode, enhancing the CO2 electroreduction performance of the FTDT cell significantly. Classical nucleation theory (CNT) clarified that the nanostructures accelerate bubble nucleation, and visualization experiments confirmed that the periodically connected pore structure provides abundant dynamic gas-liquid-solid triple-phase boundaries (TPBs). At an industrial current density of 200 mA cm-2 and a cell voltage of 2.34 V, the nano-Ag foam electrode achieves a CO faradaic efficiency of 93% and an overall energy efficiency of 51.34%, presenting a promising approach for the commercialization of CO2 electrolysis.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Key Laboratory of Low-grade Energy Utilization Technologies and Systems, Chongqing University, Ministry of Education, Chongqing 400044, China
Institute of Engineering Thermophysics, School of Energy and Power Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · China Postdoctoral Science Foundation
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. Yan · Chem. Sci. · 2024 · 15 · 1062510.1039/d4sc02313g ↗
2. Yue · Chem. Eng. J. · 2024 · 497 · 15460710.1016/j.cej.2024.154607 ↗
3. Shen · Joule · 2024 · 8 · 110.1016/j.joule.2024.04.006 ↗
4. Ko · Nat. Commun. · 2024 · 15 · 335610.1038/s41467-024-47490-3 ↗
5. Zou · Chem. Eng. J. · 2023 · 454 · 14049610.1016/j.cej.2022.140496 ↗
6. Zhang · Small · 2023 · 19 · 230301610.1002/smll.202303016 ↗
7. Yue · Small · 2023 · 19 · 230005110.1002/smll.202300051 ↗
8. Yue · Chem. Eng. J. · 2021 · 405 · 12697510.1016/j.cej.2020.126975 ↗
9. Nam · Adv. Mater. · 2022 · 34 · 220708810.1002/adma.202207088 ↗
10. Liu · Nat. Commun. · 2022 · 13 · 187710.1038/s41467-022-29428-9 ↗
11. de Sousa · ACS ES&T Eng. · 2021 · 1 · 164910.1021/acsestengg.1c00228 ↗
12. Li · Nature · 2020 · 577 · 50910.1038/s41586-019-1782-2 ↗
13. Kibria · Adv. Mater. · 2019 · 31 · 180716610.1002/adma.201807166 ↗
14. Ren · Science · 2019 · 365 · 36710.1126/science.aax4608 ↗
15. Dinh · Science · 2018 · 360 · 78310.1126/science.aas9100 ↗
16. Pan · ACS Energy Lett. · 2022 · 7 · 422410.1021/acsenergylett.2c02292 ↗
17. Xu · ACS Energy Lett. · 2021 · 6 · 80910.1021/acsenergylett.0c02401 ↗
18. Li · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2022 · 61 · 20220149110.1002/anie.202201491 ↗
19. Zhao · Chem. Soc. · 2022 · 144 · 1044610.1021/jacs.2c02594 ↗
20. Gabardo · Joule · 2019 · 3 · 277710.1016/j.joule.2019.07.021 ↗
21. Cao-Thang · ACS Energy Lett. · 2018 · 3 · 283510.1021/acsenergylett.8b01734 ↗
22. Wheeler · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2020 · 13 · 512610.1039/d0ee02219e ↗
23. Qin · Nat. Commun. · 2023 · 14 · 564010.1038/s41467-023-41396-2 ↗
24. Sheng · Adv. Mater. · 2022 · 34 · 220129510.1002/adma.202201295 ↗
25. O'Brien · ACS Energy Lett. · 2021 · 6 · 295210.1021/acsenergylett.1c01122 ↗
26. Wen · Nat. Energy · 2022 · 7 · 97810.1038/s41560-022-01130-6 ↗
27. Wen · Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. · 2023 · 62 · 1948210.1021/acs.iecr.3c00817 ↗
28. Krishnan · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2022 · 169 · 10051710.1149/1945-7111/ac96a7 ↗
29. Maris · C. R. Phys. · 2006 · 7 · 94610.1016/j.crhy.2006.10.019 ↗
30. Chen · Chem. Eng. J. · 2024 · 497 · 15458410.1016/j.cej.2024.154584 ↗
31. Chen · Inorg. Chem. · 2023 · 63 · 87010.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c03888 ↗
32. Lei · Chin. J. Catal. · 2024 · 65 · 16310.1016/s1872-2067(24)60109-9 ↗
33. Zhang · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2022 · 15 · 70510.1039/d1ee02608a ↗
34. Wakerley · Nat. Energy · 2022 · 7 · 13010.1038/s41560-021-00973-9 ↗
35. Li · Small · 2023 · 19 · 230133810.1002/smll.202301338 ↗
36. Hsieh · ACS Catal. · 2015 · 5 · 534910.1021/acscatal.5b01235 ↗
37. Li · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2022 · 61 · e20221043210.1002/anie.202210432 ↗
38. Suter · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2019 · 12 · 166810.1039/c9ee00656g ↗
39. Singh · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2017 · 114 · E881210.1073/pnas.1713164114 ↗
40. Chen · Chem. Soc. · 2012 · 134 · 1996910.1021/ja309317u ↗
41. Liu · Nat. Commun. · 2021 · 12 · 677610.1038/s41467-021-27118-6 ↗
42. Zhao · Langmuir · 2019 · 35 · 539210.1021/acs.langmuir.9b00119 ↗
43. Xiao · EES Catal. · 2023 · 1 · 5410.1039/d2ey00046f ↗
44. Lees · ACS Energy Lett. · 2020 · 5 · 216510.1021/acsenergylett.0c00898 ↗
45. Yang · Nat. Commun. · 2020 · 11 · 59310.1038/s41467-020-14402-0 ↗
46. Alexander · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2018 · 47 · 872110.1039/C8CS00072G ↗