Harnessing machine learning for efficient large-scale interatomic potential for sildenafil and pharmaceuticals containing H, C, N, O, and S
Source abstract
Abstract
In this study a cutting-edge approach to producing accurate and computationally efficient interatomic potentials using machine learning algorithms is presented. Specifically, the study focuses on the application of Allegro, a novel machine learning algorithm, running on high-performance GPUs for training potentials. The choice of training parameters plays a pivotal role in the quality of the potential functions. To enable this methodology, the "Solvated Protein Fragments" dataset, containing nearly 2.7 million Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations for many-body intermolecular interactions involving protein fragments and water molecules, encompassing H, C, N, O, and S elements, is considered as the training dataset. The project optimizes computational efficiency by reducing the initial dataset size according to the intended application. To assess the efficacy of the approach, the sildenafil citrate, iso-sildenafil, aspirin, ibuprofen, mebendazole and urea, representing all five relevant elements, serve as the test bed. The results of the Allegro-trained potentials demonstrate outstanding performance, benefiting from the combination of an appropriate training dataset and parameter selection. This notably enhanced computational efficiency when compared to the computationally intensive DFT method aided by GPU acceleration. Validation of the produced interatomic potentials is achieved through Allegro's own evaluation mechanism, yielding exceptional accuracy. Further verification is carried out through LAMMPS molecular dynamics simulations. Structural optimization by energy minimization and NPT Molecular Dynamics simulations are performed for each potential, assessing relaxation processes and energy reduction. Additional structures, including urea, ammonia, uracil, oxalic acid, and acetic acid, are tested, highlighting the potential's versatility in describing systems containing the aforementioned elements. Visualization of the results confirms the scientific accuracy of each structure's relaxation. The findings of this study demonstrate strong scaling and the potential for applications in pharmaceutical research, allowing the exploration of larger molecular structures not previously amenable to computational analysis at this level of accuracy The success of the machine learning approach underscores its potential to revolutionize computational solid-state physics.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Computational Drug Discovery Methods · Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Physics Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
Center for Interdisciplinary Research & Innovation, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
Center of Computation and Technology, Louisiana State University, 70803 Baton Rouge, USA
Pharmaceutical Technology Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
Funding
European Cooperation in Science and Technology
References (62)
Show source-provided references
1. Nam · Int. J. Mater. Sci. · 2021 · 22 · 3761
2. R.Petrenko and J.Meller , Encyclopedia of Life Sciences , 2010
3. Šponer · Chem. Rev. · 2018 · 118 · 417710.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00427 ↗
4. M. P.Allen and D. J.Tildesley , Computer simulation of liquids , 201710.1093/oso/9780198803195.001.0001 ↗
5. Tian · Sci. Rep. · 2012 · 210.1038/srep00523 ↗
6. Bødker · Front. Mater. · 2019 · 610.3389/fmats.2019.00175 ↗
7. Ackland · Compr. Nucl. Mater. · 2012 · 26710.1016/B978-0-08-056033-5.00026-4 ↗
8. Stoneham · Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. · 1986 · 37 · 5310.1146/annurev.pc.37.100186.000413 ↗
9. R. D.Levine , Molecular reaction Dynamics , 200510.1017/CBO9780511614125 ↗
10. Behler · J. Chem. Phys. · 2016 · 145 · 17090110.1063/1.4966192 ↗
11. Pastewka · MRS Bull. · 2012 · 37 · 49310.1557/mrs.2012.94 ↗
12. Nordlund · C. R. Phys. · 2008 · 9 · 34310.1016/j.crhy.2007.10.012 ↗
13. Dudarev · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2007 · 19 · 239001
14. Mahadevan · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2007 · 111 · 891910.1021/jp072530o ↗
15. Liu · J. Chem. Theory Comput. · 2019 · 15 · 412210.1021/acs.jctc.9b00261 ↗
16. Kahlen · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2014 · 118 · 396010.1021/jp412490c ↗
17. Wang · Extreme Mech. Lett. · 2018 · 24 · 110.1016/j.eml.2018.08.002 ↗
18. Kocabaş · Nanoscale · 2023 · 15 · 877210.1039/D3NR00399J ↗
19. M.Abadi , P.Barham , J.Chen , Z.Chen , A.Davis , J.Dean , M.Devin , S.Ghemawat , G.Irving , M.Isard , M.Kudlur , J.Levenberg , R.Monga , S.Moore , D. G.Murray , B.Steiner , P.Tucker , V.Vasudevan , P.Warden , M.Wicke , Y.Yu and X.Zheng , arxiv , 2016 , arXiv:1605.08695 [cs.DC], 10.48550/arXiv.1605.0869510.48550/arXiv.1605.08695 ↗
20. Behler · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2007 · 98 · 14640110.1103/PhysRevLett.98.146401 ↗
21. Thompson · J. Comput. Phys. · 2015 · 285 · 31610.1016/j.jcp.2014.12.018 ↗
22. Zuo · J. Phys. Chem. A · 2020 · 124 · 73110.1021/acs.jpca.9b08723 ↗
23. Deringer · Adv. Mater. · 2019 · 31 · 190276510.1002/adma.201902765 ↗
24. Mueller · J. Chem. Phys. · 2020 · 152 · 05090210.1063/1.5126336 ↗
25. Hansen · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2015 · 6 · 232610.1021/acs.jpclett.5b00831 ↗
26. I.Batatia , S.Batzner , D. P.Kovács , A.Musaelian , G. N. C.Simm , R.Drautz , C.Ortner , B.Kozinsky and G.Csányi , arXiv , 2022 , preprint, arXiv:2205.06643, 10.48550/arXiv.2205.0664310.48550/arXiv.2205.06643 ↗
27. Di Costanzo · Molecules · 2019 · 24 · 215510.3390/molecules24112155 ↗
28. Kesharwani · J. Drug Delivery Sci. Technol. · 2020 · 60 · 10202110.1016/j.jddst.2020.102021 ↗
29. Stocker · Mach. Learn.: Sci. Technol. · 2022 · 3 · 045010
30. Smith · Chem. Sci. · 2017 · 8 · 319210.1039/C6SC05720A ↗
31. Sultan · J. Chem. Theory Comput. · 2018 · 14 · 188710.1021/acs.jctc.8b00025 ↗
32. Udegbe · Comput. Sci. IT Res. J. · 2024 · 5 · 89210.51594/csitrj.v5i4.1048 ↗
33. Ko · Acc. Chem. Res. · 2021 · 54 · 80810.1021/acs.accounts.0c00689 ↗
34. Takamoto · Nat. Commun. · 2022 · 13 · 299110.1038/s41467-022-30687-9 ↗
35. Khalid · Pharm. Commun. · 2023 · 2 · 6310.55627/pharma.002.01.0297 ↗
36. Simonca · Children · 2017 · 4 · 6010.3390/children4070060 ↗
37. Rizvi · Saudi Pharm. J. · 2018 · 26 · 6410.1016/j.jsps.2017.10.012 ↗
38. Kowalczuk · Prog. Polym. Sci. · 2014 · 39 · 4310.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.10.004 ↗
39. Restani · Part. Part. Syst. Charact. · 2020 · 37 · 190044710.1002/ppsc.201900447 ↗
40. Beck-Broichsitter · J. Controlled Release · 2012 · 157 · 46910.1016/j.jconrel.2011.09.058 ↗
41. S.Plimpton , A.Kohlmeyer , A.Thompson , S.Moore and R.Berger , LAMMPS Stable release 29 September 2021, Zenodo, 2021
42. Musaelian · Nat. Commun. · 2023 · 14 · 57910.1038/s41467-023-36329-y ↗
43. Batzner · Nat. Commun. · 2022 · 13 · 245310.1038/s41467-022-29939-5 ↗
44. Zhang · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2018 · 120 · 14300110.1103/PhysRevLett.120.143001 ↗
45. U. O.Thorsten and M.Markus
46. Unke · J. Chem. Theory Comput. · 2019 · 15 · 367810.1021/acs.jctc.9b00181 ↗
47. Kresse · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 1996 · 54 · 1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
48. Kresse · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 1999 · 59 · 175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
49. NIST Computational Chemistry Comparison and Benchmark Database
50. Hauf · Struct. Dyn. · 2019 · 6 · 01450310.1063/1.5079229 ↗
51. National Center for Biotechnology Information
52. Ouranidis · Pharmaceuticals · 2021 · 14 · 36510.3390/ph14040365 ↗
53. M. M.El-Abadelah , S. S.Sabri , M. A.Khanfar , W.Voelter and C.Maichle-Moessmer , 2000 , CCDC 135041: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination, 2000, 10.5517/cc4jj5b10.5517/cc4jj5b ↗
54. Stone · J. Appl. Crystallogr. · 2009 · 42 · 38510.1107/S0021889809008450 ↗
55. Zavodnik · Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B: Struct. Sci. · 1999 · 55 · 4510.1107/S0108768198005746 ↗
56. Martins · J. Pharm. Sci. · 2009 · 98 · 233610.1002/jps.21593 ↗
57. C.Patiño , L.Alzate-Vargas , C.Li , B.Haley and A.Strachan , LAMMPS Data-File Generator, nanoHUB, 2021
58. Bauer · Cryst. Growth Des. · 2010 · 10 · 313210.1021/cg100241c ↗
59. J. F.Nye , Physical properties of crystals: Their Representation by Tensors and Matrices , Oxford University Press , 1985
60. Melnikov · J. Pharm. Sci. · 2003 · 92 · 214010.1002/jps.10469 ↗
61. E.Nikidis , N.Kyriakopoulos , R.Tohid , K.Kachrimanis and J.Kioseoglou
62. E.Nikidis , N.Kyriakopoulos , R.Tohid , K.Kachrimanis and J.Kioseoglou