journal article·2024Open access

Gradual degradation in InAs quantum dot lasers on Si and GaAs

Eamonn T. Hughes, Chen Shang, Jennifer Selvidge, Daehwan Jung, Yating Wan, Robert W. Herrick, John E. Bowers, Kunal Mukherjee

Nanoscale· Volume 16· Issue 6

Abstract

Reliable quantum dot lasers on silicon are a key remaining challenge to successful integrated silicon photonics. In this work, quantum dot (QD) lasers on silicon with and without misfit dislocation trapping layers are aged for 12 000 hours and are compared to QD lasers on native GaAs aged for 8400 hours. The non-trapping-layer (TL) laser on silicon degrades heavily during this time, but much more modest gradual degradation is observed for the other two devices. Electroluminescence imaging reveals relatively uniform gradual dimming for the aged TL laser on silicon. At the same time, we find nanoscale dislocation loop defects throughout the quantum dot-based active region of all three aged lasers via electron microscopy. The Burgers vector of these loops is consistent with . We suggest that the primary source of degradation, however, is the generation and migration of point defects that substantially enhance non-radiative recombination in the active region, the visible symptom of which is the formation of dislocation loops. To prevent this, we propose that laser fabrication should be switched from deeply etched to shallow etch ridges where the active region remains intact near the mesa. Additionally, post-growth annealing and altered growth conditions in the active region should be explored to minimize the grown-in point defect density.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices · Photonic and Optical Devices · Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Materials Department, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, USA

National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, USA

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, USA

Center for Opto-electronic Materials and Devices, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Seoul, South Korea

Integrated Photonics Lab, Computer, Electrical and Mathematical Science and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia

Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA, USA

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA

Funding

Air Force Research Laboratory · National Science Foundation

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Margalit · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2021 · 118 · 22050110.1063/5.0050117 ↗
2. Meng · Adv. Photonics Res. · 2021 · 2 · 200003310.1002/adpr.202000033 ↗
3. Norman · APL Photonics · 2018 · 3 · 03090110.1063/1.5021345 ↗
4. El-Masry · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1987 · 51 · 160810.1063/1.98570 ↗
5. Shang · Phys. Status Solidi A · 2021 · 218 · 110.1002/pssa.202000402 ↗
6. Selvidge · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2020 · 117 · 12210110.1063/5.0023378 ↗
7. Németh · J. Cryst. Growth · 2008 · 310 · 159510.1016/j.jcrysgro.2007.11.127 ↗
8. Alcotte · APL Mater. · 2016 · 4 · 04610110.1063/1.4945586 ↗
9. Z.Xiangjie , L.Xiang , L.Guanlin , S.Ling , Z.Shiyong and Q.Haihua , 2023 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC) , 10.23919/OFC49934.2023.1011688710.23919/OFC49934.2023.10116887 ↗
10. Liu · IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. · 2015 · 21 · 1900708
11. Kazi · Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2001 · 40 · 490310.1143/JJAP.40.4903 ↗
12. Selvidge · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2019 · 115 · 13110210.1063/1.5113517 ↗
13. Mukherjee · J. Appl. Phys. · 2020 · 128 · 02570310.1063/1.5143606 ↗
14. Selvidge · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2021 · 118 · 19210110.1063/5.0052316 ↗
15. Shang · Optica · 2021 · 8 · 74910.1364/OPTICA.423360 ↗
16. Jung · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2018 · 112 · 15350710.1063/1.5026147 ↗
17. Petroff · J. Appl. Phys. · 1974 · 45 · 389910.1063/1.1663883 ↗
18. Saito · IEEE J. Quantum Electron. · 1977 · 13 · 56410.1109/JQE.1977.1069399 ↗
19. Robertson · J. Appl. Phys. · 1981 · 52 · 446210.1063/1.329372 ↗
20. Kondo · IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 1983 · 30 · 32110.1109/T-ED.1983.21124 ↗
21. Neethling · Acta Phys. Pol., A · 2019 · 136 · 24510.12693/APhysPolA.136.245 ↗
22. Jones · Phys. Status Solidi A · 1993 · 137 · 38910.1002/pssa.2211370211 ↗
23. Shang · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2023 · 33 · 230464510.1002/adfm.202304645 ↗
24. Uematsu · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1992 · 60 · 161210.1063/1.107217 ↗
25. Phillips · Ultramicroscopy · 2011 · 111 · 148310.1016/j.ultramic.2011.07.001 ↗
26. D.Hull and D. J.Bacon , Introduction to Dislocations , Elsevier , Oxford , 5th edn, 2011
27. Ueda · J. Appl. Phys. · 1979 · 50 · 76510.1063/1.326042 ↗
28. Ueda · Microelectron. Reliab. · 1999 · 39 · 183910.1016/S0026-2714(99)00193-6 ↗
29. Hutchinson · Philos. Mag. · 1975 · 32 · 74510.1080/14786437508221617 ↗
30. Hayakawa · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1988 · 52 · 25210.1063/1.99484 ↗
31. R. G.Waters , D. S.Hill , M.Douglas and A.Co , Influence of V/Ill Variation on AIxGal_xAS Quantum Well Lasers Grown by Metalorganic Chemical Vapor Deposition , 1988 , vol. 17
32. Zenari · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2021 · 54 · 28510110.1088/1361-6463/abf9dc ↗
33. Buffolo · IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. · 2022 · 28 · 110.1109/JSTQE.2021.3091960 ↗