Compact ring resonators of silicon nanorods for strong optomechanical interaction
Source abstract
Abstract
Optomechanical interaction in microstructures plays a more and more important role in the fields of quantum technology, information processing, and sensing, among others. It is still a challenge to obtain a strong optomechanical interaction in a compact device. Here, we propose and demonstrate that compact ring resonators consisting of silicon nanorods can realize strong optomechanical interaction even surpassing that of most optical microcavities. The proposed ring resonators can well confine infrared optical waves by the quasi-bound states in the continuum. Meanwhile, each nanorod in the resonator acts as a mechanical resonator of GHz resonating frequency, thus realizing an optomechanical coupling rate of up to 1.8 MHz. We have found that the interaction area can be extended by increasing the number of nanorods while maintaining the optomechanical interaction strength. Finally, we have studied the influence of supporting structures for suspended nanorods on the optomechanical interaction properties. The proposed ring resonators of silicon nanorods offer a promising platform for the study of optomechanical interaction.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical and Optical Resonators · Photonic and Optical Devices · Advanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Electronic Engineering, College of Information Science and Technology, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China
Joint Laboratory of Digital Optical Chip, Wuyi University, Jiangmen 529020, China
Institute of Microscale Optoelectronics, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
Funding
Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province · Leading Talents Program of Guangdong Province
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. Aspelmeyer · Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2014 · 86 · 139110.1103/RevModPhys.86.1391 ↗
2. Pennec · Nanophotonics · 2014 · 3 · 41310.1515/nanoph-2014-0004 ↗
3. Safavi-Naeini · Optica · 2019 · 6 · 21310.1364/OPTICA.6.000213 ↗
4. Wiederhecker · APL Photonics · 2019 · 4 · 07110110.1063/1.5088169 ↗
5. Otterstrom · Science · 2018 · 360 · 111310.1126/science.aar6113 ↗
6. Gundavarapu · Nat. Photonics · 2019 · 13 · 6010.1038/s41566-018-0313-2 ↗
7. Ma · Laser Photonics Rev. · 2020 · 14 · 190027810.1002/lpor.201900278 ↗
8. Pant · Laser Photonics Rev. · 2014 · 8 · 65310.1002/lpor.201300154 ↗
9. Balram · Nat. Photonics · 2016 · 10 · 34610.1038/nphoton.2016.46 ↗
10. Eggleton · Nat. Photonics · 2019 · 13 · 66410.1038/s41566-019-0498-z ↗
11. Yu · Light: Sci. Appl. · 2020 · 9 · 110.1038/s41377-019-0231-1 ↗
12. Zhu · Science · 2007 · 318 · 174810.1126/science.1149066 ↗
13. Sounas · Nat. Photonics · 2017 · 11 · 77410.1038/s41566-017-0051-x ↗
14. Verhagen · Nature · 2012 · 482 · 6310.1038/nature10787 ↗
15. Gröblacher · Nature · 2009 · 460 · 72410.1038/nature08171 ↗
16. Carmon · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2005 · 94 · 22390210.1103/PhysRevLett.94.223902 ↗
17. Kippenberg · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2005 · 95 · 03390110.1103/PhysRevLett.95.033901 ↗
18. Rokhsari · Opt. Express · 2005 · 13 · 529310.1364/OPEX.13.005293 ↗
19. Park · Nat. Phys. · 2009 · 5 · 48910.1038/nphys1303 ↗
20. Tomes · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2009 · 102 · 11360110.1103/PhysRevLett.102.113601 ↗
21. Jiang · Opt. Express · 2009 · 17 · 2091110.1364/OE.17.020911 ↗
22. Wiederhecker · Nature · 2009 · 462 · 63310.1038/nature08584 ↗
23. Espinel · Sci. Rep. · 2017 · 7 · 110.1038/srep43423 ↗
24. Santos · Opt. Express · 2017 · 25 · 50810.1364/OE.25.000508 ↗
25. Eichenfield · Nature · 2009 · 462 · 7810.1038/nature08524 ↗
26. Rolland · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 101 · 06110910.1063/1.4744539 ↗
27. Safavi-Naeini · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2014 · 112 · 15360310.1103/PhysRevLett.112.153603 ↗
28. Fang · Nat. Photonics · 2016 · 10 · 48910.1038/nphoton.2016.107 ↗
29. Mercadé · Opt. Lett. · 2020 · 45 · 523810.1364/OL.402398 ↗
30. Ippen · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1972 · 21 · 53910.1063/1.1654249 ↗
31. Hill · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1976 · 28 · 60810.1063/1.88583 ↗
32. Rowell · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1979 · 34 · 13910.1063/1.90726 ↗
33. Song · Opt. Express · 2005 · 13 · 8210.1364/OPEX.13.000082 ↗
34. Marpaung · Optica · 2015 · 2 · 7610.1364/OPTICA.2.000076 ↗
35. Li · Nat. Commun. · 2013 · 4 · 1
36. Pant · Opt. Lett. · 2011 · 36 · 368710.1364/OL.36.003687 ↗
37. Rakich · Phys. Rev. X · 2012 · 2 · 011008
38. Laer · Nat. Photonics · 2015 · 9 · 19910.1038/nphoton.2015.11 ↗
39. Shin · Nat. Commun. · 2013 · 4 · 1
40. Li · Nature · 2008 · 456 · 48010.1038/nature07545 ↗
41. Fan · J. Opt. Soc. Am. B · 1995 · 12 · 126710.1364/JOSAB.12.001267 ↗
42. Luan · Opt. Express · 2006 · 14 · 326310.1364/OE.14.003263 ↗
43. Blaustein · Opt. Express · 2007 · 15 · 1738010.1364/OE.15.017380 ↗
44. Du · Phys. Rev. A · 2011 · 83 · 03580310.1103/PhysRevA.83.035803 ↗
45. Savelev · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 2014 · 89 · 03543510.1103/PhysRevB.89.035435 ↗
46. Wang · ACS Photonics · 2021 · 8 · 275510.1021/acsphotonics.1c00880 ↗
47. Bakker · Nano Lett. · 2017 · 17 · 345810.1021/acs.nanolett.7b00381 ↗
48. Savelev · ACS Photonics · 2016 · 3 · 186910.1021/acsphotonics.6b00384 ↗
49. Ding · ACS Photonics · 2020 · 7 · 100110.1021/acsphotonics.9b01678 ↗
50. Yang · Opt. Lett. · 2021 · 46 · 446610.1364/OL.436316 ↗
51. Xiao · Phys. Rev. B · 2022 · 105 · 19544010.1103/PhysRevB.105.195440 ↗
52. Xiao · Opt. Express · 2022 · 30 · 3259010.1364/OE.468925 ↗
53. Kostyukov · Phys. Rev. B · 2022 · 105 · 07540410.1103/PhysRevB.105.075404 ↗
54. Kühner · Nat. Commun. · 2022 · 13 · 499210.1038/s41467-022-32697-z ↗
55. Zanotto · Phys. Rev. Appl. · 2022 · 17 · 04403310.1103/PhysRevApplied.17.044033 ↗
56. Han · Opt. Lett. · 2018 · 43 · 540310.1364/OL.43.005403 ↗
57. Ruan · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2010 · 105 · 01390110.1103/PhysRevLett.105.013901 ↗