journal article·2024

Structurally different chemical chaperones show similar mechanical roles with independent molecular mechanisms

Deep Chaudhuri, Debojyoti Chowdhury, Soham Chakraborty, Madhu Bhatt, Rudranil Chowdhury, Aakashdeep Dutta, Ayush Mistry, Shubhasis Haldar

Nanoscale· Volume 16· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

-oxide (TMAO) and trehalose, as mechanical stabilizers of protein structure. We observed that these osmolytes increase the protein L mechanical stability by decreasing unfolding kinetics while accelerating the refolding kinetics under force, eventually shifting the energy landscape toward the folded state. These osmolytes mechanically stabilize the protein L and plausibly guide them to more thermodynamically robust states. Finally, we observed that osmolyte-modulated protein folding increases mechanical work output up to twofold, allowing the protein to fold under a higher force regime and providing a significant implication for folding-induced structural stability in proteins.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Heat shock proteins research · Protein Structure and Dynamics · RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry, Ashoka University, Sonepat, Haryana, India

Department of Chemical and Biological Sciences, S.N. Bose National Center for Basic Sciences, Kolkata, West Bengal, India

Department of Biology, Trivedi School of Biosciences, Ashoka University, Sonepat, Haryana, India

Funding

Science and Engineering Research Board · Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India

References (56)

Show source-provided references
1. Ma · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2014 · 111 · 847610.1073/pnas.1403224111 ↗
2. Liao · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2017 · 114 · 247910.1073/pnas.1614609114 ↗
3. Rydeen · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2018 · 140 · 744110.1021/jacs.8b03903 ↗
4. Aioanei · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2011 · 50 · 439410.1002/anie.201006714 ↗
5. Stasiulewicz · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2022 · 126 · 299010.1021/acs.jpcb.2c00281 ↗
6. Canchi · Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. · 2013 · 64 · 27310.1146/annurev-physchem-040412-110156 ↗
7. Aioanei · Proteins: Struct., Funct., Bioinf. · 2011 · 79 · 221410.1002/prot.23045 ↗
8. Su · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2017 · 119 · 10810210.1103/PhysRevLett.119.108102 ↗
9. Jain · Protein Sci. · 2009 · 18 · 2410.1002/pro.3 ↗
10. Sola-Penna · Eur. J. Biochem. · 1997 · 248 · 2410.1111/j.1432-1033.1997.00024.x ↗
11. Yiu · ChemBioChem · 2000 · 1 · 4910.1002/1439-7633(20000703)1:1<49::AID-CBIC49>3.0.CO;2-A ↗
12. Garcia-Manyes · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2009 · 106 · 1054010.1073/pnas.0902090106 ↗
13. Ganguly · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2018 · 140 · 48310.1021/jacs.7b11695 ↗
14. Lin · Protein Sci. · 2009 · 18 · 52610.1002/pro.52 ↗
15. Sarma · J. Chem. Phys. · 2012 · 137 · 09450210.1063/1.4748101 ↗
16. Laurent · Commun. Chem. · 2022 · 5 · 110.1038/s42004-022-00726-z ↗
17. Chakraborty · Commun. Biol. · 2022 · 5 · 110.1038/s42003-022-03258-3 ↗
18. Popa · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2016 · 138 · 1054610.1021/jacs.6b05429 ↗
19. Chakraborty · Nanoscale · 2022 · 14 · 765910.1039/D1NR07582A ↗
20. Chaudhuri · Biomacromolecules · 2022 · 23 · 295110.1021/acs.biomac.2c00451 ↗
21. Haldar · Nat. Commun. · 2017 · 8 · 66810.1038/s41467-017-00771-6 ↗
22. Valle-Orero · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2017 · 56 · 974110.1002/anie.201703630 ↗
23. Valle-Orero · Nanotechnology · 2017 · 28 · 17400310.1088/1361-6528/aa655e ↗
24. Haldar · Nat. Commun. · 2017 · 8 · 66810.1038/s41467-017-00771-6 ↗
25. Hänggi · Rev. Mod. Phys. · 1990 · 62 · 25110.1103/RevModPhys.62.251 ↗
26. Polizzi · Isr. J. Chem. · 2016 · 56 · 81610.1002/ijch.201600040 ↗
27. Singhal · J. Chem. Phys. · 2005 · 123 · 20490910.1063/1.2116947 ↗
28. Schlierf · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2004 · 101 · 729910.1073/pnas.0400033101 ↗
29. Dahal · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2020 · 124 · 328310.1021/acs.jpcb.0c00167 ↗
30. Liu · Biophys. J. · 2009 · 96 · 381010.1016/j.bpj.2009.01.043 ↗
31. Chekmarev · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2021 · 23 · 1785610.1039/D0CP06560A ↗
32. Eckels · Cell Rep. · 2019 · 27 · 183610.1016/j.celrep.2019.04.046 ↗
33. Chen · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2015 · 137 · 354010.1021/ja5119368 ↗
34. Liu · Nano Lett. · 2019 · 19 · 552410.1021/acs.nanolett.9b02062 ↗
35. Zhang · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2012 · 116 · 704010.1021/jp300171h ↗
36. Hong · Biophys. J. · 2016 · 111 · 186610.1016/j.bpj.2016.09.035 ↗
37. Schneck · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2013 · 117 · 831010.1021/jp400790f ↗
38. Hong · Biophys. J. · 2015 · 109 · 14410.1016/j.bpj.2015.05.037 ↗
39. Ganguly · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2020 · 124 · 618110.1021/acs.jpcb.0c04357 ↗
40. Lee · J. Chem. Theory Comput. · 2016 · 12 · 40510.1021/acs.jctc.5b00935 ↗
41. Eckels · Annu. Rev. Physiol. · 2018 · 80 · 32710.1146/annurev-physiol-021317-121254 ↗
42. Popa · Emerging Top. Life Sci. · 2018 · 2 · 68710.1042/ETLS20180044 ↗
43. Javadi · Physiology · 2013 · 28 · 910.1152/physiol.00017.2012 ↗
44. Rivas-Pardo · Cell Rep. · 2016 · 14 · 133910.1016/j.celrep.2016.01.025 ↗
45. Motlagh · Biophys. J. · 2016 · 110 · 128010.1016/j.bpj.2015.12.042 ↗
46. Paul · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2007 · 129 · 447610.1021/ja0685506 ↗
47. Mondal · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2015 · 112 · 927010.1073/pnas.1511780112 ↗
48. Jethva · Biochemistry · 2018 · 57 · 585110.1021/acs.biochem.8b00698 ↗
49. Cho · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2011 · 115 · 1340110.1021/jp207289b ↗
50. Rani · Sci. Rep. · 2016 · 6 · 2365610.1038/srep23656 ↗
51. Martínez · J. Chem. Theory Comput. · 2017 · 13 · 635810.1021/acs.jctc.7b00599 ↗
52. Canchi · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2012 · 116 · 1209510.1021/jp304298c ↗
53. Mojtabavi · Iran. J. Pharm. Res. · 2019 · 18 · 13
54. Tapia-Rojo · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2019 · 116 · 787310.1073/pnas.1821284116 ↗
55. Tapia-Rojo · Sci. Adv. · 2020 · 6 · eaaz470710.1126/sciadv.aaz4707 ↗
56. Tapia-Rojo · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2020 · 117 · 2134610.1073/pnas.2004091117 ↗