A high-index facet gold 12 tip nanostar for an improved electrocatalytic alcohol oxidation reaction with superior CO tolerance
Source abstract
Abstract
Direct alcohol fuel cells have a long and promising future, which will require the development of highly active electrocatalysts for alcohol electrooxidation reactions. To this end, high-index facet nanomaterial-based electrocatalysts provide significant promise for the successful oxidation of alcohols. However, the fabrication and exploration of high-index facet nanomaterials are seldom reported, especially in electrocatalytic applications. Herein, we successfully synthesized a high index facet {711} Au 12 tip nanostructure for the first time using a single-chain cationic TDPB surfactant. Electrooxidation results demonstrate that a {711} high-index facet Au 12 tip exhibited much higher electrocatalytic activity (∼10-fold higher) than the {111} low-index facet Au nanoparticles (Au NPs) without being poisoned by CO under identical conditions. Besides, Au 12 tip nanostructures offer appreciable stability and durability. The high electrocatalytic activity with excellent CO tolerance is due to the spontaneous adsorption of the negatively charged -OH on the high-index facet Au 12 tip nanostars, as evidenced by the isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) analysis. Our findings suggest that high-index facet Au nanomaterials are ideal candidate electrode materials for the electrooxidation reaction of ethanol in fuel cells.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Electrochemical Analysis and Applications · Electrochemical sensors and biosensors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan, Republic of China
Funding
National Tsing Hua University · Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan
References (72)
Show source-provided references
1. An · J. Power Sources · 2017 · 341 · 19910.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.11.117 ↗
2. Liu · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2020 · 10 · 200139710.1002/aenm.202001397 ↗
3. Fu · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2022 · 32 · 210640110.1002/adfm.202106401 ↗
4. Bahari · Int. J. Energy Res. · 2019 · 43 · 512810.1002/er.4498 ↗
5. Xiong · Nat. Commun. · 2019 · 10 · 378210.1038/s41467-019-11766-w ↗
6. Yu · Catal. Lett. · 2011 · 141 · 187210.1007/s10562-011-0719-7 ↗
7. Tian · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2021 · 46 · 3120210.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.07.006 ↗
8. Valdes-Lopez · Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. · 2020 · 79 · 10084210.1016/j.pecs.2020.100842 ↗
9. Mansor · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2019 · 44 · 1474410.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.04.100 ↗
10. Lyu · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2020 · 8 · 1544510.1039/D0TA03199B ↗
11. Lu · Chem. Eng. J. · 2023 · 451 · 13866810.1016/j.cej.2022.138668 ↗
12. Chaitree · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2019 · 166 · H39210.1149/2.0041910jes ↗
13. Wang · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2021 · 46 · 3431810.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.08.022 ↗
14. Mandal · Appl. Catal., A · 2015 · 492 · 10010.1016/j.apcata.2014.12.012 ↗
15. Yang · Langmuir · 2020 · 36 · 1109410.1021/acs.langmuir.0c02102 ↗
16. Yin · Chem. – Eur. J. · 2012 · 18 · 488710.1002/chem.201103674 ↗
17. Liu · CrystEngComm · 2015 · 17 · 630810.1039/C5CE01162K ↗
18. Bo · Nanoscale · 2020 · 12 · 1219610.1039/D0NR02596H ↗
19. Yang · Nanoscale · 2019 · 11 · 2320610.1039/C9NR07235G ↗
20. Qin · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2020 · 30 · 191010710.1002/adfm.201910107 ↗
21. Darby · Top. Catal. · 2018 · 61 · 42810.1007/s11244-017-0882-1 ↗
22. Vu · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 2019 · 728 · 8010.1016/j.cplett.2019.04.082 ↗
23. Jiang · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2018 · 6 · 1768210.1039/C8TA06676K ↗
24. Li · Mater. Horiz. · 2021 · 8 · 165710.1039/D0MH01947J ↗
25. Bi · ACS Appl. Nano Mater. · 2021 · 4 · 458410.1021/acsanm.1c00186 ↗
26. Tang · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2022 · 10 · 1090210.1039/D2TA01011A ↗
27. Zhang · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2021 · 13 · 3314710.1021/acsami.1c08691 ↗
28. Zhang · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2018 · 6 · 1373510.1039/C8TA04087G ↗
29. Wang · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2020 · 12 · 3903310.1021/acsami.0c08914 ↗
30. Zhu · Nanotechnology · 2022 · 33 · 22540410.1088/1361-6528/ac56bc ↗
31. Wy · Acc. Chem. Res. · 2022 · 55 · 83110.1021/acs.accounts.1c00682 ↗
32. Rajagopal · Nanoscale · 2022 · 14 · 1132310.1039/D2NR02741K ↗
33. Zhang · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2013 · 52 · 64510.1002/anie.201205279 ↗
34. Ahmad · Appl. Nanosci. · 2014 · 4 · 49110.1007/s13204-013-0224-y ↗
35. Pedireddy · Nat. Commun. · 2014 · 5 · 494710.1038/ncomms5947 ↗
36. Durand · Surf. Sci. · 2011 · 605 · 135410.1016/j.susc.2011.04.028 ↗
37. Mandal · Appl. Catal., A · 2015 · 492 · 10010.1016/j.apcata.2014.12.012 ↗
38. Hsieh · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2013 · 38 · 1034510.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.05.146 ↗
39. Cushing · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2012 · 134 · 1503310.1021/ja305603t ↗
40. Huanga · J. Colloid Interface Sci. · 2022 · 625 · 85010.1016/j.jcis.2022.06.108 ↗
41. Tritsaris · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2012 · 116 · 1198010.1021/jp209506d ↗
42. Huang · Appl. Catal., B · 2019 · 258 · 11797410.1016/j.apcatb.2019.117974 ↗
43. Luo · Adv. Mater. · 2018 · 30 · 170551510.1002/adma.201705515 ↗
44. Tao · Sci. Bull. · 2021 · 66 · 4410.1016/j.scib.2020.07.021 ↗
45. Qi · Chem. Commun. · 2014 · 50 · 56010.1039/C3CC48061E ↗
46. Li · Appl. Catal., B · 2020 · 277 · 11913510.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119135 ↗
47. Yu · Fuel · 2022 · 315 · 12328010.1016/j.fuel.2022.123280 ↗
48. Xia · Adv. Mater. Interfaces · 2018 · 5 · 180029710.1002/admi.201800297 ↗
49. Zhang · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2018 · 6 · 1373510.1039/C8TA04087G ↗
50. Ahmed · ACS Catal. · 2014 · 4 · 183010.1021/cs500103a ↗
51. Babu · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2019 · 21 · 824610.1039/C8CP07500J ↗
52. Yang · J. Mater. Chem. · 2012 · 22 · 805710.1039/c2jm16916a ↗
53. Zhang · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2014 · 39 · 824610.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.03.193 ↗
54. Puthiyapura · Top. Catal. · 2018 · 61 · 24010.1007/s11244-018-0893-6 ↗
55. Yu · ACS Catal. · 2019 · 9 · 314410.1021/acscatal.8b04741 ↗
56. Liu · ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. · 2020 · 8 · 644910.1021/acssuschemeng.0c00967 ↗
57. Xiang · J. Power Sources · 2018 · 399 · 42210.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.07.102 ↗
58. Wei · ACS Appl. Energy Mater. · 2019 · 2 · 720410.1021/acsaem.9b01168 ↗
59. Wei · Electrochim. Acta · 2021 · 396 · 13926610.1016/j.electacta.2021.139266 ↗
60. Bu · Nat. Commun. · 2016 · 7 · 1185010.1038/ncomms11850 ↗
61. Huang · Sci. China Mater. · 2021 · 64 · 60110.1007/s40843-020-1469-2 ↗
62. Fu · ACS Catal. · 2022 · 12 · 1140210.1021/acscatal.2c03022 ↗
63. You · ACS Catal. · 2014 · 4 · 282910.1021/cs500390s ↗
64. Chen · J. Phys. Chem. B · 1999 · 103 · 68210.1021/jp9836372 ↗
65. Dutta · J. Power Sources · 2017 · 361 · 27610.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.06.063 ↗
66. Liu · J. Mater. Chem. B · 2014 · 2 · 353110.1039/C4TB00252K ↗
67. Tang · Carbohydr. Polym. · 2020 · 244 · 11651210.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116512 ↗
68. Wang · J. Chem. Thermodyn. · 2015 · 91 · 25610.1016/j.jct.2015.08.002 ↗
69. Zargar · Chem.-Biol. Interact. · 2021 · 350 · 10970710.1016/j.cbi.2021.109707 ↗
70. Pireaux · Surf. Sci. · 1984 · 141 · 22110.1016/0039-6028(84)90207-3 ↗
71. Kielbassa · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2004 · 108 · 1918410.1021/jp048547d ↗
72. Bastus · Langmuir · 2011 · 27 · 1109810.1021/la201938u ↗