Machine learning-aided understanding of the structure–activity relationship: a case study of MoS 2 supported metal–nonmetal pairs for the hydrogen evolution reaction
Source abstract
Abstract
Understanding the structure-performance relationship is crucial for designing highly active electrocatalysts, yet this remains a challenge. Using MoS2 supported metal-nonmetal atom pairs (XTM@MoS2, TM = Sc-Ni, and X = B, C, N, O, P, Se, Te, and S) for the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) as an example, we successfully uncovered the structure-activity relationship with the help of density functional theory (DFT) calculations and integrated machine learning (ML) methods. An ML model based on random forest regression was used to predict the activity, and the trained model exhibited excellent performance with minimal error. SHapley Additive exPlanations analysis revealed that the atom mass and covalent radius of the X atom (m_X and R_X) dominate the activity, and their higher values usually lead to better activity. In addition, four promising candidates, i.e., PCr@MoS2, SV@MoS2, SeTi@MoS2, and SeSc@MoS2, with excellent activity are selected. This work provides several promising catalysts for the HER but, more importantly, offers a workflow to explore the structure-activity relationship.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Machine Learning in Materials Science · Fuel Cells and Related Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Physics Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225002, China
Department of Fundamental Courses, Wuxi Institute of Technology, Wuxi 214121, China
Key Laboratory of Quantum Materials and Devices of Ministry of Education, School of Physics, Southeast University, Nanjing, 211189, China
Funding
Six Talent Peaks Project in Jiangsu Province · Southeast University · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. Larcher · Nat. Chem. · 2015 · 7 · 1910.1038/nchem.2085 ↗
2. Zhang · Chin. J. Catal. · 2021 · 42 · 85510.1016/S1872-2067(20)63714-7 ↗
3. Debe · Nature · 2012 · 486 · 4310.1038/nature11115 ↗
4. Seh · Science · 2017 · 355 · 499810.1126/science.aad4998 ↗
5. Xu · Coord. Chem. Rev. · 2021 · 436 · 21382410.1016/j.ccr.2021.213824 ↗
6. Wang · Nano Converg. · 2021 · 8 · 410.1186/s40580-021-00254-x ↗
7. Gong · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2018 · 6 · 509810.1039/C7TA11104E ↗
8. Wei · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2024 · 240478710.1002/adfm.202404787 ↗
9. Cheng · Nano Energy · 2023 · 115 · 10871810.1016/j.nanoen.2023.108718 ↗
10. Li · Chin. Chem. Lett. · 2023 · 109237
11. Li · Adv. Mater. · 2018 · 30 · 180367610.1002/adma.201803676 ↗
12. Jaramillo · Science · 2007 · 317 · 10010.1126/science.1141483 ↗
13. Kuang · Adv. Mater. · 2024 · 36 · 230693410.1002/adma.202306934 ↗
14. Tang · Coord. Chem. Rev. · 2023 · 492 · 21528810.1016/j.ccr.2023.215288 ↗
15. Fu · Mater. Horiz. · 2023 · 10 · 85210.1039/D2MH01197B ↗
16. Li · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2022 · 32 · 220772710.1002/adfm.202207727 ↗
17. Chen · Small · 2022 · 18 · 220410010.1002/smll.202204100 ↗
18. Yuan · Small Methods · 2023 · 7 · 220152410.1002/smtd.202201524 ↗
19. Zuo · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2022 · 12 · 210338310.1002/aenm.202103383 ↗
20. Ren · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2022 · 144 · 1287410.1021/jacs.2c04540 ↗
21. Lu · Adv. Mater. · 2020 · 32 · 200265810.1002/adma.202002658 ↗
22. Zhao · Nat. Rev. Mater. · 2019 · 4 · 79210.1038/s41578-019-0152-x ↗
23. Zheng · J. Energy Chem. · 2021 · 56 · 1016
24. Sun · Energy Environ. Mater. · 2023 · e12693
25. Xiao · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2023 · 57 · 395110.1021/acs.est.2c09034 ↗
26. Wang · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2022 · 144 · 1606910.1021/jacs.2c06288 ↗
27. Wang · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2020 · 142 · 773710.1021/jacs.0c01825 ↗
28. Jiao · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2023 · 145 · 1557210.1021/jacs.3c05171 ↗
29. Jin · J. Energy Chem. · 2023 · 82 · 3110.1016/j.jechem.2023.03.004 ↗
30. Zhang · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2023 · 16 · 506510.1039/D3EE01981K ↗
31. Wang · Green Energy Environ. · 2023 · 8 · 82010.1016/j.gee.2021.10.003 ↗
32. Kim · Adv. Mater. · 2023 · 35 · 221149710.1002/adma.202211497 ↗
33. Liu · Appl. Soft Comput. · 2024 · 153 · 11126910.1016/j.asoc.2024.111269 ↗
34. Yan · Nat. Mach. Intell. · 2020 · 2 · 28310.1038/s42256-020-0180-7 ↗
35. Santiago · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2020 · 142 · 1792310.1021/jacs.0c08867 ↗
36. Gao · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2016 · 120 · 1676110.1021/acs.jpcc.6b04692 ↗
37. Gao · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2015 · 119 · 1312410.1021/acs.jpcc.5b04658 ↗
38. Xu · Nanoscale · 2019 · 11 · 2022810.1039/C9NR06083A ↗
39. Li · ACS Catal. · 2022 · 12 · 768710.1021/acscatal.2c00759 ↗
40. Blöchl · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 1994 · 50 · 1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
41. Perdew · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1996 · 77 · 386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
42. Li · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2015 · 137 · 1430510.1021/jacs.5b07756 ↗
43. Baerends · Theor. Chem. Acc. · 2001 · 265
44. Kresse · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 1996 · 54 · 1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
45. Hong · ACS Catal. · 2016 · 6 · 442810.1021/acscatal.6b00619 ↗
46. Chen · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2015 · 3 · 1889810.1039/C5TA02817E ↗
47. Hinnemann · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2005 · 127 · 530810.1021/ja0504690 ↗
48. Yue · Phys. Lett. A · 2013 · 377 · 136210.1016/j.physleta.2013.03.034 ↗
49. Andriotis · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 2014 · 90 · 12530410.1103/PhysRevB.90.125304 ↗
50. Yin · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2016 · 138 · 796510.1021/jacs.6b03714 ↗
51. Seh · Science · 2017 · 355 · 499810.1126/science.aad4998 ↗
52. Gao · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2019 · 492 · 810.1016/j.apsusc.2019.06.050 ↗
53. Meng · Angew. Chem. · 2020 · 132 · 1058810.1002/ange.202003484 ↗
54. Kim · Sustain. Cities Soc. · 2022 · 79 · 10367710.1016/j.scs.2022.103677 ↗
55. Nordin · Asian J. Psychiatry · 2023 · 79 · 10331610.1016/j.ajp.2022.103316 ↗
56. Kuno · J. Med. Virol. · 2022 · 94 · 95810.1002/jmv.27393 ↗