Effective surface passivation of GaAs nanowire photodetectors by a thin ZnO capping
Source abstract
Abstract
The III-V nanowire (NW) structure is a good candidate for developing photodetectors. However, high-density surface states caused by the large surface-to-volume ratio severely limit their performance, which is difficult to solve in conventional ways. Here, a robust surface passivation method, using a thin layer of ZnO capping, is developed for promoting NW photodetector performance. 11 cycles of ZnO, grown on pure zinc blende high-quality GaAs NWs by atomic layer deposition, significantly alleviates the undesirable effect of the surface states, without noticeable degradation in NW morphology. An average 20-fold increase in micro-photoluminescence intensity is observed for passivated NWs, which leads to the development of detectors with high responsivity, specific detectivity, and optical gain of 9.46 × 105 A W-1, 3.93 × 1014 Jones, and 2.2 × 108 %, respectively, under low-intensity 532 nm illumination. Passivated NW detectors outperform their counterparts treated by conventional methods, so far as we know, which shows the potential and effectiveness of thin ZnO surface passivation on NW devices.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanowire Synthesis and Applications · Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices · GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Integrated Circuits, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 311200, China
State Key Laboratory of Information Photonics and Optical Communications, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China
State Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering, College of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Zhejiang University, 866 Yuhangtang Rd, Hangzhou 310027, China
Funding
Zhejiang University · Science and Technology Program of Zhejiang Province
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Zhang · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 48 · 46300110.1088/0022-3727/48/46/463001 ↗
2. Zhang · Crystals · 2019 · 9 · 8710.3390/cryst9020087 ↗
3. Yuan · Appl. Phys. Rev. · 2021 · 8 · 210.1063/5.0044706 ↗
4. Wu · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2019 · 123 · 1478110.1021/acs.jpcc.9b02320 ↗
5. Gao · Nano Lett. · 2016 · 16 · 744610.1021/acs.nanolett.6b03119 ↗
6. Zhang · J. Mater. Chem. C · 2017 · 5 · 431910.1039/C7TC00594F ↗
7. Li · Photonics Res. · 2020 · 8 · 186210.1364/PRJ.403030 ↗
8. Chen · Nanotechnology · 2022 · 33 · 13570710.1088/1361-6528/ac451f ↗
9. Lin · Opt. Express · 2019 · 27 · 3280110.1364/OE.27.032801 ↗
10. He · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2022 · 56 · 01510510.1088/1361-6463/ac9fe1 ↗
11. Zuo · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2022 · 120 · 710.1063/5.0066507 ↗
12. Ito · Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 1994 · 33 · 8810.1143/JJAP.33.88 ↗
13. Chia · J. Appl. Phys. · 2012 · 112 · 610.1063/1.4752873 ↗
14. Ren · Nano Lett. · 2019 · 19 · 279310.1021/acs.nanolett.8b04420 ↗
15. Black · Nano Lett. · 2017 · 17 · 628710.1021/acs.nanolett.7b02972 ↗
16. Milojevic · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 93 · 25
17. Lebedev · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2020 · 533 · 14748410.1016/j.apsusc.2020.147484 ↗
18. Alekseev · Nano Lett. · 2015 · 15 · 6310.1021/nl502909k ↗
19. Shen · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2024 · 124 · 12
20. Kim · IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2016 · 37 · 37310.1109/LED.2016.2524470 ↗
21. Tajik · Nanotechnology · 2012 · 23 · 31570310.1088/0957-4484/23/31/315703 ↗
22. Raj · Appl. Mater. Today · 2020 · 18 · 10050310.1016/j.apmt.2019.100503 ↗
23. Vu · J. Alloys Compd. · 2022 · 924 · 16653110.1016/j.jallcom.2022.166531 ↗
24. Chen · J. Alloys Compd. · 2019 · 775 · 121310.1016/j.jallcom.2018.10.281 ↗
25. Pham · Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. · 2021 · 121 · 10534410.1016/j.mssp.2020.105344 ↗
26. Kundu · Solid State Commun. · 2011 · 151 · 188110.1016/j.ssc.2011.09.033 ↗
27. Zhu · Adv. Mater. · 2021 · 33 · 210572910.1002/adma.202105729 ↗
28. Ursaki · Crystals · 2022 · 12 · 114510.3390/cryst12081145 ↗
29. Kolhep · Nano Lett. · 2023 · 23 · 692010.1021/acs.nanolett.3c01531 ↗
30. Gagrani · Nanoscale Horiz. · 2022 · 7 · 44610.1039/D1NH00535A ↗
31. Byun · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2014 · 6 · 1048210.1021/am502048d ↗
32. Liu · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2018 · 444 · 47410.1016/j.apsusc.2018.03.099 ↗
33. Ali · Small · 2018 · 14 · 170442910.1002/smll.201704429 ↗
34. Fouache · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2000 · 153 · 22310.1016/S0169-4332(99)00330-X ↗
35. Skopin · Nanoscale · 2018 · 10 · 1158510.1039/C8NR02440E ↗
36. Hüpkes · ChemPhysChem · 2012 · 13 · 6610.1002/cphc.201100738 ↗
37. Jiang · Nanoscale · 2022 · 14 · 1283010.1039/D2NR02736D ↗
38. Tajik · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 100 · 2010.1063/1.4719675 ↗
39. Miao · ACS Nano · 2014 · 8 · 362810.1021/nn500201g ↗
40. Seo · Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. · 2006 · 9 · G6910.1149/1.2159295 ↗
41. Demichel · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 97 · 2010.1063/1.3519980 ↗
42. Lan · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2022 · 596 · 15350610.1016/j.apsusc.2022.153506 ↗
43. Baca · Thin Solid Films · 1997 · 308 · 59910.1016/S0040-6090(97)00439-2 ↗
44. Chen · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2019 · 11 · 3318810.1021/acsami.9b07891 ↗
45. Wang · Adv. Opt. Mater. · 2021 · 9 · 210128910.1002/adom.202101289 ↗
46. Chen · Nanotechnology · 2018 · 29 · 09520110.1088/1361-6528/aaa4d6 ↗
47. Li · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2021 · 119 · 5
48. Thunich · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 95 · 810.1063/1.3193540 ↗
49. Nur · Commun. Mater. · 2020 · 1 · 10310.1038/s43246-020-00103-0 ↗
50. Wang · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 103 · 9