Influence of stacking on the aqueous proton penetration behaviour across two-dimensional graphtetrayne
Source abstract
Abstract
Two-dimensional (2D) graphtetrayne (G4) with intrinsic pattern triangular nanopores has been predicted to be an excellent candidate for next-generation proton exchange membranes due to its superior proton conductivity and selectivity. However, it is technically challenging to prepare a large area single-layer intact 2D material. A multi-layer stacked 2D material is a much more suitable choice, and the stacking can effectively shield the undesired defects and tears. In this work, we investigate the aqueous proton penetration behavior across multilayer-stacked two-dimensional G4 using extensive ReaxFF molecular dynamics simulations. We found that the G4 layers prefer a slightly misplaced stacking pattern which would cause only a slight reduction in the pore size. Detailed analyses indicate that the "water wires" across G4 remain continuous and can provide a low-barrier path for proton penetration until the number of stacking layers increases to three. In triple-layer G4, the "water wires" no longer exist and the aqueous phase will be separated by a wide vacuum area, thus significantly impeding the proton penetration behavior. Based on these results, we suggest that when serving as a proton exchange membrane, the number of stacking G4 layers should be fewer than three to achieve satisfactory conductivity. Our work provides guidance for the fabrication of next-generation proton exchange membranes based on nanoporous 2D materials.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques · Advanced battery technologies research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State key Laboratory of Electrical Insulation and Power Equipment
Centre of Nanomaterials for Renewable Energy
School of Electrical Engineering
Xi'an Jiaotong University
Xi'an 710049
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Peighambardoust · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2010 · 35 · 934910.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.05.017 ↗
2. Li · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2011 · 4 · 114710.1039/c0ee00770f ↗
3. Xu · Acta Mech. Sin. · 2017 · 33 · 55510.1007/s10409-017-0667-6 ↗
4. Mauritz · Chem. Rev. · 2004 · 104 · 453510.1021/cr0207123 ↗
5. Staiti · J. Membr. Sci. · 2001 · 188 · 7110.1016/S0376-7388(01)00359-3 ↗
6. Li · J. Membr. Sci. · 2003 · 226 · 15910.1016/j.memsci.2003.08.018 ↗
7. Fan · Carbon · 2012 · 50 · 169910.1016/j.carbon.2011.12.016 ↗
8. Wang · Sci. Rep. · 2013 · 3 · 199610.1038/srep01996 ↗
9. Park · Nanoscale · 2016 · 8 · 956310.1039/C5NR09278G ↗
10. Liang · Nano Lett. · 2010 · 10 · 245410.1021/nl100750v ↗
11. Safron · Small · 2011 · 7 · 49210.1002/smll.201001193 ↗
12. Zeng · Adv. Mater. · 2012 · 24 · 413810.1002/adma.201104281 ↗
13. Surwade · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2015 · 10 · 45910.1038/nnano.2015.37 ↗
14. Fox · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 98 · 24311710.1063/1.3601467 ↗
15. Song · Nano Lett. · 2011 · 11 · 224710.1021/nl200369r ↗
16. Russo · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2012 · 109 · 595310.1073/pnas.1119827109 ↗
17. O'Hern · Nano Lett. · 2014 · 14 · 123410.1021/nl404118f ↗
18. Guirguis · Carbon · 2019 · 155 · 66010.1016/j.carbon.2019.09.028 ↗
19. Mi · Science · 2019 · 364 · 103310.1126/science.aax3103 ↗
20. Hu · Nature · 2014 · 516 · 22710.1038/nature14015 ↗
21. Yan · J. Power Sources · 2016 · 311 · 18810.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.02.030 ↗
22. Holmes · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2017 · 7 · 160121610.1002/aenm.201601216 ↗
23. Liu · ACS Nano · 2019 · 13 · 2094
24. Walker · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2015 · 107 · 21310410.1063/1.4936335 ↗
25. Kroes · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2017 · 19 · 581310.1039/C6CP08923B ↗
26. Shi · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2017 · 8 · 435410.1021/acs.jpclett.7b01999 ↗
27. Baughman · J. Chem. Phys. · 1987 · 87 · 668710.1063/1.453405 ↗
28. Shi · Nat. Commun. · 2019 · 10 · 116510.1038/s41467-019-09151-8 ↗
29. Li · Chem. Commun. · 2010 · 46 · 325610.1039/b922733d ↗
30. Gao · Nano Energy · 2018 · 43 · 19210.1016/j.nanoen.2017.11.005 ↗
31. Boutilier · ACS Nano · 2014 · 8 · 84110.1021/nn405537u ↗
32. Celebi · Science · 2014 · 344 · 28910.1126/science.1249097 ↗
33. Cohen-Tanugi · Nano Lett. · 2016 · 16 · 102710.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04089 ↗
34. Akhavan · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2018 · 20 · 1360710.1039/C8CP02076K ↗
35. Yoon · ACS Nano · 2018 · 12 · 1076410.1021/acsnano.8b06268 ↗
36. Marx · ChemPhysChem · 2006 · 7 · 184810.1002/cphc.200600128 ↗
37. Hassanali · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2013 · 110 · 1372310.1073/pnas.1306642110 ↗
38. Zhang · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2018 · 9 · 544510.1021/acs.jpclett.8b02379 ↗
39. Zhang · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2018 · 122 · 408310.1021/acs.jpcb.8b01127 ↗
40. Bonomi · Comput. Phys. Commun. · 2009 · 180 · 196110.1016/j.cpc.2009.05.011 ↗
41. Gonze · Comput. Mater. Sci. · 2002 · 25 · 47810.1016/S0927-0256(02)00325-7 ↗
42. Gonze · Z. Kristallogr. · 2005 · 220 · 55810.1524/zkri.220.5.558.65066 ↗
43. Gonze · Comput. Phys. Commun. · 2009 · 180 · 258210.1016/j.cpc.2009.07.007 ↗
44. Blochl · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 1994 · 50 · 1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
45. Perdew · J. Chem. Phys. · 1996 · 105 · 998210.1063/1.472933 ↗
46. Narita · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 2000 · 62 · 1114610.1103/PhysRevB.62.11146 ↗
47. Luo · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2013 · 117 · 1307210.1021/jp402218k ↗
48. Wallqvist · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 1990 · 165 · 43710.1016/0009-2614(90)85456-M ↗
49. Walther · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2000 · 105 · 998010.1021/jp011344u ↗
50. Pal · Phys. Rev. E: Stat., Nonlinear, Soft Matter Phys. · 2003 · 67 · 06150210.1103/PhysRevE.67.061502 ↗