Nanostructured cobalt/copper catalysts for efficient electrochemical carbon dioxide reduction
Source abstract
Abstract
The search for an efficient and stable catalyst for the electrochemical reduction of CO2 to value-added chemicals is especially critical for lowering the atmospheric CO2 concentration. In this study, self-supported cobalt/copper nanostructured catalysts were designed, where the influences of the elemental composition and acid-etching on their efficiency towards the CO2 reduction reaction were studied. The developed Co/Cu catalysts showed superb catalytic activity with a low onset potential at -0.2 V vs. RHE. Gas and liquid product analysis revealed that formate and CO were the main products. It was observed that lower reductive potentials were favourable for formate production, while higher reductive potentials were more favourable for CO formation. In situ electrochemical FTIR studies were further conducted to gain insight into the CO2 reduction mechanism. The novel synthetic procedure reported in this study leads to promising electrocatalysts with high efficiencies for the conversion of CO2 into valuable products.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Electrochemical Technology Centre, Department of Chemistry, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2 W1, Canada
Funding
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada · Canada Foundation for Innovation
References (75)
Show source-provided references
1. Trends in Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide, https://gml.noaa.gov/ccgg/trends/global.html
2. Aldred · Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. · 2022 · 103 · S1110.1175/BAMS-D-22-0092.1 ↗
3. Augustine · J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. · 2022 · 127 · 110.1029/2021JD036342 ↗
4. Ahmad · Energy Rep. · 2020 · 6 · 197310.1016/j.egyr.2020.07.020 ↗
5. Thonemann · J. Cleaner Prod. · 2022 · 332 · 13006710.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130067 ↗
6. Bograd · Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci. · 2023 · 15 · 110.1146/annurev-marine-032122-021945 ↗
7. A.Mirzabaev , L.Olsson , R. B.Kerr , P.Pradhan , M. G. R.Ferre and H.Lotze-Campen , Science and innovation for food systems transformation: Climate Change and Food Systems , Springer , Cham , 2021
8. Babonneau · Oper. Res. Lett. · 2023 · 51 · 3310.1016/j.orl.2022.11.002 ↗
9. Hao · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2022 · 15 · 213910.1039/D1EE03923G ↗
10. Assche · Clean Technol. Environ. Policy · 2022 · 24 · 46710.1007/s10098-021-02128-6 ↗
11. Abner · Appl. Catal., B · 2022 · 301 · 12076110.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120761 ↗
12. Salverda · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2023 · 127 · 715110.1021/acs.jpcc.3c00181 ↗
13. Hossain · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2022 · 14 · 5188910.1021/acsami.2c14368 ↗
14. Yang · Inorg. Chem. Front. · 2021 · 8 · 169510.1039/D0QI01351J ↗
15. Kaliyaperumal · ACS Eng. Au · 2023 · 3 · 40310.1021/acsengineeringau.3c00030 ↗
16. Mustafa · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2021 · 9 · 455810.1039/D0TA11111B ↗
17. Wu · Appl. Catal., B · 2020 · 271 · 11895710.1016/j.apcatb.2020.118957 ↗
18. Siltamaki · J. Electrochem. · 2021 · 27 · 278
19. Zhang · Appl. Catal., A · 2020 · 598 · 11754510.1016/j.apcata.2020.117545 ↗
20. Wang · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2023 · 15 · 137610.1021/acsami.2c19502 ↗
21. Rettenmaier · EES Catal. · 2024 · 2 · 31110.1039/D3EY00162H ↗
22. Hu · Nanoscale · 2024 · 16 · 490910.1039/D3NR06456E ↗
23. Chen · Nano Res. · 2022 · 15 · 328310.1007/s12274-021-3978-7 ↗
24. Liao · Small · 2015 · 11 · 322110.1002/smll.201403380 ↗
25. Ma · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2023 · 145 · 24707
26. Fan · Sci. Adv. · 2020 · 6 · 1
27. Wu · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2020 · 12 · 1156210.1021/acsami.9b21153 ↗
28. Lu · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2023 · 15 · 1322810.1021/acsami.3c01448 ↗
29. Liu · Nanoscale · 2021 · 13 · 115510.1039/D0NR08138H ↗
30. Gao · ACS Appl. Energy Mater. · 2023 · 6 · 134010.1021/acsaem.2c03131 ↗
31. Wang · ACS Nano · 2023 · 17 · 1868810.1021/acsnano.3c07307 ↗
32. Raciti · ACS Energy Lett. · 2018 · 3 · 154510.1021/acsenergylett.8b00553 ↗
33. Siltamaki · J. Electrochem. · 2021 · 27 · 278
34. Rahmati · Nanomaterials · 2023 · 13 · 77810.3390/nano13040778 ↗
35. Dai · Small Methods · 2019 · 3 · 1
36. Hao · Electrochim. Acta · 2023 · 449 · 14221310.1016/j.electacta.2023.142213 ↗
37. Wang · Catal. Lett. · 2023 · 153 · 211510.1007/s10562-022-04125-w ↗
38. Mosali · Nanoscale · 2022 · 14 · 1556010.1039/D2NR03539A ↗
39. Bernal · Nano Energy · 2018 · 53 · 2710.1016/j.nanoen.2018.08.027 ↗
40. Wang · J. Mater. Sci. · 2022 · 57 · 727610.1007/s10853-022-07107-w ↗
41. Dondapati · Chem. Commun. · 2022 · 58 · 1112710.1039/D2CC04358K ↗
42. Sidhureddy · Chem. Commun. · 2019 · 55 · 362610.1039/C8CC10194A ↗
43. Dubale · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2015 · 3 · 1248210.1039/C5TA01961C ↗
44. Hossain · Appl. Catal., B · 2019 · 259 · 11809610.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118096 ↗
45. Serapinienė · Coatings · 2023 · 13 · 133510.3390/coatings13081335 ↗
46. Chung · Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. · 2007 · 10 · A15510.1149/1.2730721 ↗
47. Huang · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2018 · 10 · 4440310.1021/acsami.8b14822 ↗
48. Lejaeghere · Crit. Rev. Solid State Mater. Sci. · 2014 · 39 · 110.1080/10408436.2013.772503 ↗
49. Rutt · Chem. Commun. · 2006 · 88 · 286910.1039/b605105g ↗
50. Hyam · J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. · 2012 · 12 · 839610.1166/jnn.2012.6673 ↗
51. Rüsing · J. Nanomater. · 2013 · 2013 · 71485310.1155/2013/714853 ↗
52. Prabaharan · Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process. · 2017 · 123 · 110.1007/s00339-017-0786-8 ↗
53. Biesinger · Surf. Interface Anal. · 2017 · 49 · 132510.1002/sia.6239 ↗
54. Biesinger · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2010 · 257 · 88710.1016/j.apsusc.2010.07.086 ↗
55. Biesinger · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2011 · 257 · 271710.1016/j.apsusc.2010.10.051 ↗
56. Chen · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2019 · 123 · 2389810.1021/acs.jpcc.9b04080 ↗
57. Papasizza · ACS Catal. · 2018 · 8 · 634510.1021/acscatal.8b00977 ↗
58. Lukashuk · ACS Catal. · 2018 · 8 · 863010.1021/acscatal.8b01237 ↗
59. Hao · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2023 · 62 · e20230417910.1002/anie.202304179 ↗
60. Moradzaman · ACS Catal. · 2020 · 10 · 804910.1021/acscatal.0c02130 ↗
61. Innocent · Appl. Catal., B · 2010 · 94 · 21910.1016/j.apcatb.2009.10.027 ↗
62. Baruch · ACS Catal. · 2015 · 5 · 314810.1021/acscatal.5b00402 ↗
63. Firet · ACS Catal. · 2017 · 7 · 60610.1021/acscatal.6b02382 ↗
64. Davis · J. Solution Chem. · 1972 · 1 · 32910.1007/BF00715991 ↗
65. Oliver · Can. J. Chem. · 1973 · 51 · 69810.1139/v73-106 ↗
66. Wu · Nanoscale · 2024 · 16 · 392610.1039/D3NR06357G ↗
67. Katayama · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2019 · 123 · 595110.1021/acs.jpcc.8b09598 ↗
68. Peterson · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2012 · 3 · 25110.1021/jz201461p ↗
69. Tsujiguchi · ACS Catal. · 2021 · 11 · 331010.1021/acscatal.0c04887 ↗
70. Kim · Langmuir · 1998 · 14 · 611310.1021/la980259j ↗
71. Feaster · ACS Catal. · 2017 · 7 · 482210.1021/acscatal.7b00687 ↗
72. Zhi · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2021 · 14 · 391210.1039/D1EE00740H ↗
73. Fu · Appl. Catal., B · 2023 · 339 · 12317010.1016/j.apcatb.2023.123170 ↗
74. Liu · Appl. Catal., B · 2024 · 341 · 12327410.1016/j.apcatb.2023.123274 ↗
75. Burdyny · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2019 · 12 · 144210.1039/C8EE03134G ↗