Revealing the stochastic kinetics evolution of photocatalytic CO 2 reduction
Source abstract
Abstract
Investigating kinetic mechanisms to design efficient photocatalysts is critical for improving photocatalytic CO2 reduction, but the stochastic photo-physical/chemical properties of kinetics remain unclear. Herein, we propose a statistical study to discuss the stochastic feature evolution of photocatalytic systems. The uncertainties of light absorption, charge carrier migration, and surface reaction are described by nonparametric estimation methods in the proposed model, which includes the effect of operational and material parameters. The density distribution of surface electrons shifts from a skewed distribution to an approximate uniform distribution as incident photon density increases. The system temperature rising induces the rate-determining step of surface reactions to change from charge carrier kinetics to reactant activation processes. Benefiting from the synergistic optimization between the operational parameter and active site density, the electron-capturing probability of active sites is boosted from 0.06 to 0.17. The modified reaction kinetic equation is constructed based on the distribution function of charge carrier kinetics. Furthermore, the experimental photoactivity results are consistent with the statistical analysis, which proves the feasibility of the established model. The characterization tests show that the gap between testing activities and theoretical efficiency is caused by a mismatch between charge carrier supply and mass transfer. Our work unveils the stochastic features in photocatalytic CO2 reduction, offering a comprehensive analytical framework for photocatalytic system optimization.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Energy and Power Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China
Integrated Energy Research Institute, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China
Funding
Basic Research Program of Jiangsu Province · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (71)
Show source-provided references
1. Meng · Nanoscale · 2022 · 14 · 1445510.1039/D2NR03703C ↗
2. Liu · Nano Lett. · 2021 · 21 · 162010.1021/acs.nanolett.0c04148 ↗
3. Wang · Appl. Catal., B · 2021 · 292 · 12014710.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120147 ↗
4. Que · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2021 · 13 · 618010.1021/acsami.0c18391 ↗
5. Lai · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2022 · 15 · 360310.1039/D2EE00472K ↗
6. Zhu · Energy Convers. Manage. · 2020 · 222 · 11323610.1016/j.enconman.2020.113236 ↗
7. Wang · Nat. Energy · 2020 · 5 · 70310.1038/s41560-020-0678-6 ↗
8. Lundberg · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2022 · 144 · 1362310.1021/jacs.2c03883 ↗
9. Li · Mater. Today Energy · 2022 · 24 · 10094310.1016/j.mtener.2022.100943 ↗
10. Zhao · Small · 2018 · 14 · 180076210.1002/smll.201800762 ↗
11. Zheng · Appl. Energy · 2021 · 301 · 11749610.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117496 ↗
12. Ješić · Chem. Eng. J. · 2021 · 407 · 12679910.1016/j.cej.2020.126799 ↗
13. Bhosale · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2019 · 141 · 2043410.1021/jacs.9b11089 ↗
14. Qin · Chem. Commun. · 2021 · 57 · 846810.1039/D1CC02847B ↗
15. Jin · Appl. Catal., B · 2020 · 263 · 11835310.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118353 ↗
16. Gu · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2020 · 521 · 14621310.1016/j.apsusc.2020.146213 ↗
17. Garay-Rodríguez · J. Energy Chem. · 2019 · 37 · 1810.1016/j.jechem.2018.11.014 ↗
18. Wang · Chem. Eng. J. · 2020 · 384 · 12338010.1016/j.cej.2019.123380 ↗
19. Ma · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2022 · 12 · 220025310.1002/aenm.202200253 ↗
20. Hao · ACS Nano · 2022 · 16 · 325110.1021/acsnano.1c11145 ↗
21. Zhang · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2020 · 30 · 200598310.1002/adfm.202005983 ↗
22. Luo · Nat. Commun. · 2022 · 13 · 223010.1038/s41467-022-29825-0 ↗
23. Bao · Sol. RRL · 2021 · 5 · 210011810.1002/solr.202100118 ↗
24. Wang · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2014 · 43 · 523410.1039/C4CS00126E ↗
25. Fu · Mater. Today · 2020 · 32 · 22210.1016/j.mattod.2019.06.009 ↗
26. Schukraft · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2022 · 14 · 1934210.1021/acsami.2c00335 ↗
27. Li · ACS Nano · 2020 · 14 · 1055210.1021/acsnano.0c04544 ↗
28. Xu · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2019 · 29 · 190425610.1002/adfm.201904256 ↗
29. Yang · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2022 · 61 · e20220558510.1002/anie.202205585 ↗
30. Yuan · Energy Convers. Manage. · 2014 · 81 · 9810.1016/j.enconman.2014.02.027 ↗
31. Wang · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2019 · 141 · 223810.1021/jacs.8b13528 ↗
32. Zhu · ChemPhysChem · 2022 · 23 · e20210085110.1002/cphc.202100851 ↗
33. Srimath Kandada · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2016 · 138 · 1360410.1021/jacs.6b06463 ↗
34. Wang · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2020 · 11 · 236910.1021/acs.jpclett.0c00315 ↗
35. Jian · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2021 · 125 · 1518510.1021/acs.jpcc.1c03585 ↗
36. Yang · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2021 · 60 · 1378810.1002/anie.202103808 ↗
37. Takanabe · ACS Catal. · 2017 · 7 · 800610.1021/acscatal.7b02662 ↗
38. Garcia-Esparza · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2016 · 4 · 289410.1039/C5TA06983A ↗
39. Bala Chandran · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2018 · 11 · 11510.1039/C7EE01360D ↗
40. Tress · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2018 · 11 · 15110.1039/C7EE02415K ↗
41. Liu · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2017 · 19 · 886610.1039/C6CP07328J ↗
42. Liu · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2016 · 18 · 1152010.1039/C6CP01065B ↗
43. Liu · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2016 · 18 · 3191410.1039/C6CP06320A ↗
44. S.Ghahramani , Fundamentals of probability: with stochastic processes , Chapman and Hall/CRC , 2018
45. Khuri · WIREs Comp. Stats. · 2010 · 2 · 12810.1002/wics.73 ↗
46. Fryer · IMA J. Appl. Math. · 1977 · 20 · 33510.1093/imamat/20.3.335 ↗
47. Taddiken · Microelectron. Reliab. · 2021 · 118 · 11404410.1016/j.microrel.2021.114044 ↗
48. Nishiyama · Nature · 2021 · 598 · 30410.1038/s41586-021-03907-3 ↗
49. Terranova · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2020 · 8 · 939210.1039/D0TA01502D ↗
50. Chiang · ACS Catal. · 2018 · 8 · 278210.1021/acscatal.7b04264 ↗
51. Wang · ChemistrySelect · 2020 · 5 · 877910.1002/slct.202001693 ↗
52. Wang · ACS Appl. Energy Mater. · 2020 · 3 · 146810.1021/acsaem.9b01927 ↗
53. Reshchikov · Phys. Status Solidi A · 2021 · 218 · 200010110.1002/pssa.202000101 ↗
54. van de Lagemaat · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2001 · 105 · 1119410.1021/jp0118468 ↗
55. Reifert · Nat. Commun. · 2021 · 12 · 28510.1038/s41467-020-20554-w ↗
56. Göbel · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1982 · 48 · 127710.1103/PhysRevLett.48.1277 ↗
57. Koch · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2017 · 121 · 1606610.1021/acs.jpcc.7b02812 ↗
58. Langmuir · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1916 · 38 · 222110.1021/ja02268a002 ↗
59. Kumar · Catal. Commun. · 2008 · 9 · 8210.1016/j.catcom.2007.05.019 ↗
60. Yang · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2021 · 72 · 16210.1016/j.jmst.2020.09.024 ↗
61. Botev · Annu. Stat. · 2010 · 38 · 291610.1214/10-AOS799 ↗
62. Sheather · J. R. Stat. Soc. B · 1991 · 53 · 68310.1111/j.2517-6161.1991.tb01857.x ↗
63. Albero · ACS Catal. · 2020 · 10 · 573410.1021/acscatal.0c00478 ↗
64. Qian · Catal. Today · 2019 · 335 · 7810.1016/j.cattod.2018.10.053 ↗
65. Xiong · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2020 · 10 · 200292810.1002/aenm.202002928 ↗
66. Li · Nat. Energy · 2019 · 4 · 69010.1038/s41560-019-0431-1 ↗
67. Navarro-Jaén · Nat. Rev. Chem. · 2021 · 5 · 56410.1038/s41570-021-00289-y ↗
68. Heng · J. Alloys Compd. · 2022 · 920 · 16594510.1016/j.jallcom.2022.165945 ↗
69. Yang · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2019 · 141 · 1121910.1021/jacs.9b04556 ↗
70. Guo · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2021 · 125 · 2638910.1021/acs.jpcc.1c06502 ↗
71. Cao · J. Catal. · 2017 · 349 · 20810.1016/j.jcat.2017.02.005 ↗