Uniaxial strain tuning of organic molecule single photon sources
Source abstract
Abstract
Organic fluorophores are excellent single photon sources, combining high brightness, lifetime-limited linewidths and useful emission wavelengths. A key factor in their performance as photon emitters is their dynamic frequency tunability, which can be used to render the emission from multiple molecules indistinguishable. In this work we demonstrate dynamic tuning of dibenzoterrylene molecules embedded in anthracene crystals through the application of uniaxial strain fields. By bending a piezoelectric strip in two opposite directions in linear steps, we impose an escalating compressive or tensile strain on the molecular crystals, resulting in two opposite dynamic detunings of the dopant dibenzoterrylene emission wavelength. To validate that the tuning mechanism is strain, we performed a similar measurement using an identical strip that was depolarised by annealing in which the tuning was absent. Finally, we simulated the effect of strain on the dopant dibenzoterrylene emission wavelength by combining molecular dynamics and density functional theory techniques to determine the strain tuning rate which matched well with that found experimentally.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical and Optical Resonators · Photonic and Optical Devices · Analytical Chemistry and Sensors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Centre for Cold Matter, Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College London, Prince Consort Road, SW7 2AZ, London, UK
Quantum Engineering Centre for Doctoral Training, University of Bristol, 5 Tyndall Avenue, BS8 1FD, Bristol, UK
Quantum Engineering Technology Labs, H. H. Wills Physics Laboratory and Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Bristol, BS8 1UB, Bristol, UK
Funding
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · Royal Society · European Commission
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. R. W.Boyd , S. G.Lukishova and V. N.Zadkov , Quantum photonics: pioneering advances and emerging applications , Springer , 2019 , vol. 21710.1007/978-3-319-98402-5 ↗
2. Lo · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2012 · 108 · 13050310.1103/PhysRevLett.108.130503 ↗
3. O'Brien · Science · 2007 · 318 · 156710.1126/science.1142892 ↗
4. Clear · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2020 · 124 · 15360210.1103/PhysRevLett.124.153602 ↗
5. Hesselink · J. Chem. Phys. · 1980 · 73 · 64810.1063/1.440167 ↗
6. Verhart · ChemPhysChem · 2016 · 17 · 152410.1002/cphc.201501087 ↗
7. Schofield · ChemPhysChem · 2022 · 23 · e20210080910.1002/cphc.202100809 ↗
8. Trebbia · Opt. Express · 2009 · 17 · 2398610.1364/OE.17.023986 ↗
9. Nicolet · ChemPhysChem · 2007 · 8 · 121510.1002/cphc.200700091 ↗
10. Major · Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2015 · 86 · 08310610.1063/1.4928500 ↗
11. Pazzagli · ACS Nano · 2018 · 12 · 429510.1021/acsnano.7b08810 ↗
12. Schofield · Phys. Rev. Res. · 2022 · 4 · 01303710.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.013037 ↗
13. Duquennoy · Optica · 2022 · 9 · 73110.1364/OPTICA.452317 ↗
14. Schädler · Nano Lett. · 2019 · 19 · 378910.1021/acs.nanolett.9b00916 ↗
15. de las Casas · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2017 · 111 · 26240310.1063/1.5004174 ↗
16. Gerhardt · Mol. Phys. · 2009 · 107 · 197510.1080/00268970903188358 ↗
17. Zhang · Nano Lett. · 2015 · 15 · 42210.1021/nl5037512 ↗
18. Grim · Nat. Mater. · 2019 · 18 · 96310.1038/s41563-019-0418-0 ↗
19. Croci · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 1993 · 212 · 7110.1016/0009-2614(93)87109-G ↗
20. Wild · J. Lumin. · 1994 · 60–61 · 100310.1016/0022-2313(94)90331-X ↗
21. Tian · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2014 · 113 · 13550510.1103/PhysRevLett.113.135505 ↗
22. RS Pro Datasheet 285-784, M641 Piezoelectric Ceramic Bimorph Element, https://docs.rs-online.com/67b9/0900766b81582396.pdf
23. Nicolet · ChemPhysChem · 2007 · 8 · 192910.1002/cphc.200700340 ↗
24. Allinger · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1989 · 111 · 855110.1021/ja00205a001 ↗
25. Allinger · J. Comput. Chem. · 1987 · 8 · 114610.1002/jcc.540080812 ↗
26. Lii · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1989 · 111 · 856610.1021/ja00205a002 ↗
27. Grančič · Cryst. Growth Des. · 2015 · 15 · 162510.1021/cg5013507 ↗
28. Bordat · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 2000 · 331 · 43910.1016/S0009-2614(00)01172-6 ↗
29. Bordat · J. Chem. Phys. · 2002 · 116 · 22910.1063/1.1420753 ↗
30. Williams · J. Mol. Struct. · 1999 · 485–486 · 32110.1016/S0022-2860(99)00092-7 ↗
31. Williams · J. Chem. Phys. · 1966 · 45 · 377010.1063/1.1727399 ↗
32. Becke · J. Chem. Phys. · 1993 · 98 · 137210.1063/1.464304 ↗
33. Stephens · J. Phys. Chem. · 1994 · 98 · 1162310.1021/j100096a001 ↗
34. Weigend · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2005 · 7 · 329710.1039/b508541a ↗
35. Neese · Chem. Phys. · 2009 · 356 · 9810.1016/j.chemphys.2008.10.036 ↗
36. Neese · Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Comput. Mol. Sci. · 2012 · 2 · 73
37. Neese · Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Comput. Mol. Sci. · 2018 · 8 · e1327
38. Schofield · J. Phys. Commun. · 2018 · 2 · 11502710.1088/2399-6528/aaf09a ↗
39. Grandi · Phys. Rev. A · 2016 · 94 · 06383910.1103/PhysRevA.94.063839 ↗
40. Bedington · npj Quantum Inf. · 2017 · 3 · 110.1038/s41534-017-0031-5 ↗
41. Toninelli · Nat. Mater. · 2021 · 20 · 161510.1038/s41563-021-00987-4 ↗
42. Liu · Opt. Express · 2013 · 21 · 950510.1364/OE.21.009505 ↗
43. Wehner · Science · 2018 · 362 · eaam928810.1126/science.aam9288 ↗
44. Zander · Opt. Express · 2009 · 17 · 2245210.1364/OE.17.022452 ↗
45. Kumar · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 99 · 16111810.1063/1.3653804 ↗
46. Trotta · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 2013 · 88 · 15531210.1103/PhysRevB.88.155312 ↗
47. Gurlek · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2021 · 127 · 12360310.1103/PhysRevLett.127.123603 ↗