Controlling morphology in electrosprayed methylcellulose nanowires via nanoparticle addition: coarse-grained modeling and experiments
Source abstract
Abstract
Electrospray deposition (ESD) has shown great promise for manufacturing micro- and nanostructured coatings at scale on versatile substrates with complex geometries. ESD exhibits a broad spectrum of morphologies depending upon the properties of spray fluids. Among them are nanowire forests or foams obtained via the in-air gelation of electrospray droplets formed from methylcellulose (MC) solutions. In this study, we explored MC ESD loaded with nanoparticles of various shapes and uncovered the effects of particle fillers on morphology evolution using coarse-grained simulations and physical experiments. Utilizing electrostatic dissipative particle dynamics, we modeled the electrohydrodynamic deformation of particle-laden MC droplets undergoing in-flight evaporation. The simulations quantitatively predict the suppression of droplet deformation as the size or concentration of spherical nanoparticles increases. While small particles can be readily encapsulated into the nanowire body, large particles can arrest nanowire formation. The model was extended to nanoparticles with complex topologies, showing MC nanowires emerging from particle edges and vertices due to curvature-enhanced electric stress. In all cases, strong agreements were found between simulation and experimental results. These results demonstrate the efficacy of the coarse-grained model in predicting the morphology evolution of electrosprayed droplets and lay the groundwork for employing MC nanowires for developing nanostructured composites.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Binghamton University, Binghamton, New York 13902, USA
Department of Materials Science Engineering, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, USA
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, USA
A.J. Drexel Nanomaterials Institute, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
Funding
National Science Foundation
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Jaworek · J. Electrost. · 2008 · 66 · 19710.1016/j.elstat.2007.10.001 ↗
2. Kavadiya · J. Aerosol Sci. · 2018 · 125 · 18210.1016/j.jaerosci.2018.04.009 ↗
3. Toth · Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2020 · 91 · 01370110.1063/1.5129625 ↗
4. Lei · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2018 · 10 · 1117510.1021/acsami.7b19812 ↗
5. Yan · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2018 · 10 · 1849910.1021/acsami.8b02914 ↗
6. Zhu · Powder Technol. · 2020 · 364 · 84510.1016/j.powtec.2020.01.066 ↗
7. Lei · Mater. Horiz. · 2020 · 7 · 264310.1039/D0MH00872A ↗
8. Castillo-Orozco · Sci. Rep. · 2017 · 7 · 514410.1038/s41598-017-05175-6 ↗
9. Sridhar · Biomatter · 2013 · 3 · e2428110.4161/biom.24281 ↗
10. Tapia-Hernandez · J. Agric. Food Chem. · 2015 · 63 · 469910.1021/acs.jafc.5b01403 ↗
11. Green-Warren · ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. · 2022 · 4 · 351110.1021/acsapm.2c00106 ↗
12. Lei · Sci. Rep. · 2020 · 10 · 1729010.1038/s41598-020-74146-1 ↗
13. Kovacevich · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2020 · 12 · 2090110.1021/acsami.9b23544 ↗
14. Rutledge · Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. · 2007 · 59 · 138410.1016/j.addr.2007.04.020 ↗
15. Jagdale · Anal. Methods · 2021 · 13 · 410510.1039/D1AY01295A ↗
16. Naguib · Adv. Mater. · 2021 · 33 · 210339310.1002/adma.202103393 ↗
17. Groot · J. Chem. Phys. · 1997 · 107 · 442310.1063/1.474784 ↗
18. Espanol · Phys. Rev. E: Stat. Phys., Plasmas, Fluids, Relat. Interdiscip. Top. · 1995 · 52 · 173410.1103/PhysRevE.52.1734 ↗
19. Groot · J. Chem. Phys. · 2003 · 118 · 1126510.1063/1.1574800 ↗
20. Gonzalez-Melchor · J. Chem. Phys. · 2006 · 125 · 22410710.1063/1.2400223 ↗
21. Terron-Mejia · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2016 · 28 · 425101
22. Thompson · Comput. Phys. Commun. · 2022 · 271 · 10817110.1016/j.cpc.2021.108171 ↗
23. Qin · Soft Matter · 2017 · 13 · 513710.1039/C7SM00637C ↗
24. Qin · Langmuir · 2018 · 34 · 558110.1021/acs.langmuir.8b00809 ↗
25. Nikunen · Phys. Rev. E: Stat., Nonlinear, Soft Matter Phys. · 2007 · 75 · 03671310.1103/PhysRevE.75.036713 ↗
26. Yong · Nano Lett. · 2013 · 13 · 626910.1021/nl403855k ↗
27. Yong · Langmuir · 2015 · 31 · 1145810.1021/acs.langmuir.5b03405 ↗
28. Shuck · ACS Chem. Health Saf. · 2021 · 28 · 32610.1021/acs.chas.1c00051 ↗
29. Schindelin · Nat. Methods · 2012 · 9 · 67610.1038/nmeth.2019 ↗
30. Gañán-Calvo · J. Aerosol Sci. · 2018 · 125 · 3210.1016/j.jaerosci.2018.05.002 ↗
31. Almeria · J. Colloid Interface Sci. · 2010 · 343 · 12510.1016/j.jcis.2009.10.002 ↗
32. J. D.Jackson , in Classical Electrodynamics , Wiley , New York, NY , 3rd edn, 1999
33. Wilm · Mol. Cell. Proteomics · 2011 · 10 · M111 00940710.1074/mcp.M111.009407 ↗
34. Xia · J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. · 2018 · 29 · 57310.1007/s13361-017-1873-y ↗
35. Akuzum · ACS Nano · 2018 · 12 · 268510.1021/acsnano.7b08889 ↗
36. Han · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2020 · 142 · 1911010.1021/jacs.0c07395 ↗
37. VahidMohammadi · Science · 2021 · 372 · eabf158110.1126/science.abf1581 ↗
38. Maleski · Chem. Mater. · 2017 · 29 · 163210.1021/acs.chemmater.6b04830 ↗