journal article·2023

Electrostatically driven unidirectional molecular flux for high performance alkaline flow batteries

Bhojkumar Nayak, Ritwik Mondal, Musthafa Ottakam Thotiyl

Nanoscale· Volume 15· Issue 35
Publisher page

Abstract

To mitigate the mismatch between energy availability and energy demand due to day/night shifts and seasonal variations, intensive efforts have been dedicated to storing renewable energy in various energy storage modules. Redox flow batteries have an upper hand over conventional batteries as energy storage modules due to their capability of decoupling energy and power. However, interfacial events, such as mass transport and electron transfer, play pivotal roles in flow batteries' energy storage and conversion mechanisms. We show that by activating electrostatic forces at the interface, unidirectional molecular flux can be achieved to and from the driving electrode surface, thereby generating a parallel or antiparallel electrostatic current along with a diffusion current. This approach of triggering electrostatic forces in flow batteries enhances their volumetric energy density and amplifies the energy efficiency to values as high as ∼92% without altering the solubility limit of the redox active species.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced battery technologies research · Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Advancements in Battery Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER)-Pune, Dr. Homi Bhabha Road, Pashan, Pune 411008, Maharashtra, India

Funding

Department of Science & Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India · University Grants Commission India

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. Armstrong · Nat. Energy · 2016 · 1 · 110.1038/nenergy.2015.20 ↗
2. Larcher · Nat. Chem. · 2015 · 7 · 1910.1038/nchem.2085 ↗
3. Scrosati · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2011 · 4 · 328710.1039/c1ee01388b ↗
4. Zhang · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2021 · 14 · 417710.1039/D1EE00531F ↗
5. Kato · Nano Lett. · 2021 · 21 · 90710.1021/acs.nanolett.0c03311 ↗
6. Ardo · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2018 · 11 · 276810.1039/C7EE03639F ↗
7. Zimmermann · Adv. Mater. Interfaces · 2021 · 8 · 110.1002/admi.202100743 ↗
8. Gür · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2018 · 11 · 269610.1039/C8EE01419A ↗
9. Wang · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2022 · 51 · 670410.1039/D1CS01008E ↗
10. Prakash · Nat. Mater. · 2023 · 22 · 62710.1038/s41563-023-01508-1 ↗
11. Bruce · Nat. Mater. · 2012 · 11 · 1910.1038/nmat3191 ↗
12. Ding · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2021 · 50 · 149510.1039/D0CS01239D ↗
13. Cai · Small · 2022 · 18 · 1
14. Sternberg · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2015 · 8 · 38910.1039/C4EE03051F ↗
15. Ziegler · Joule · 2019 · 3 · 213410.1016/j.joule.2019.06.012 ↗
16. Ventosa · ACS Appl. Energy Mater. · 2018 · 1 · 5158
17. Cui · Small · 2017 · 13 · 170237910.1002/smll.201702379 ↗
18. Singh · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2016 · 55 · 203210.1002/anie.201509054 ↗
19. Pasta · Nat. Commun. · 2014 · 5 · 110.1038/ncomms4007 ↗
20. Hou · Nat. Commun. · 2022 · 13 · 1
21. Nakao · J. Colloid Interface Sci. · 2023 · 641 · 34810.1016/j.jcis.2023.03.060 ↗
22. Lu · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2011 · 133 · 575610.1021/ja201118f ↗
23. Ma · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2021 · 50 · 700910.1039/D0CS01603A ↗
24. Luo · Joule · 2019 · 3 · 14910.1016/j.joule.2018.10.010 ↗
25. Gautam · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2021 · 12 · 137410.1021/acs.jpclett.0c03584 ↗
26. Feng · Science · 2021 · 372 · 83610.1126/science.abd9795 ↗
27. Jiang · Nano Res. Energy · 2022 · 1 · 110.26599/NRE.2022.9120003 ↗
28. Gao · Nano Res. Energy · 2023 · 2 · 110.26599/NRE.2023.9120045 ↗
29. Lu · Nanoscale · 2023 · 15 · 425010.1039/D2NR07291B ↗
30. Lee · J. Colloid Interface Sci. · 2023 · 633 · 71210.1016/j.jcis.2022.11.097 ↗
31. Zhang · Nat. Rev. Chem. · 2022 · 6 · 52410.1038/s41570-022-00394-6 ↗
32. Lin · Science · 2015 · 349 · 152910.1126/science.aab3033 ↗
33. Lin · Nat. Energy · 2016 · 1 · 1610210.1038/nenergy.2016.102 ↗
34. Wang · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2011 · 133 · 518210.1021/ja1112904 ↗
35. Dai · Small · 2012 · 8 · 113010.1002/smll.201101594 ↗
36. Wang · Nanotechnology · 2008 · 19 · 26560110.1088/0957-4484/19/26/265601 ↗
37. Sankar · Sens. Actuators, A · 2021 · 322 · 11260510.1016/j.sna.2021.112605 ↗
38. Stozhko · Nanomaterials · 2022 · 12 · 1223419710.3390/nano12234197 ↗
39. Sigwadi · Heliyon · 2019 · 5 · e0224010.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02240 ↗
40. Wang · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2012 · 3 · 216410.1021/jz3008744 ↗
41. Liu · J. Mater. Chem. · 2010 · 20 · 440910.1039/c000099j ↗
42. Ngoma · Sci. Rep. · 2021 · 11 · 110.1038/s41598-021-03042-z ↗
43. Capezza · ACS Omega · 2019 · 4 · 345810.1021/acsomega.8b03630 ↗
44. Xu · J. Hazard. Mater. · 2012 · 225–226 · 3610.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.04.061 ↗
45. Oh · J. Ind. Eng. Chem. · 2010 · 16 · 32110.1016/j.jiec.2010.01.032 ↗
46. Luo · Nano Energy · 2017 · 42 · 21510.1016/j.nanoen.2017.10.057 ↗
47. Nuutinen · Langmuir · 2022 · 38 · 991710.1021/acs.langmuir.2c01140 ↗
48. Peng · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2022 · 16 · 43010.1039/D2EE03617G ↗
49. Dizaji · Eng. Sci. · 2020 · 11 · 54
50. Wedege · Sci. Rep. · 2016 · 6 · 110.1038/srep39101 ↗
51. Goulet · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2020 · 141 · 801410.1021/jacs.8b13295 ↗