journal article·2023

Leveraging Pd(100)/SnO 2 interfaces for highly efficient electrochemical formic acid oxidation

Haiyan Huang, Tianyi Yang, Fang Sun, Zhaohui Liu, Qing Tang, Lingmei Liu, Yu Han, Jianfeng Huang

Nanoscale· Volume 15· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

The electrocatalytic formic acid oxidation (FAO) is the crucial anodic reaction of direct formic acid fuel cells (DFAFCs), but its activity remains to be largely improved in order to be practically viable. The rational development of enhanced catalysts requires thorough consideration of various contributing factors that are possibly integrated in composite systems. Here, we demonstrate that, Pd(100)/SnO2 interfaces, provided being efficiently exploited, can significantly boost FAO activity by a factor of ∼10, compared with pure Pd(100) facets, with the mass activity reaching a record of 14.55 A mgPd-1 at a 40 mV-lower peak potential. Unique Pd/SnO2 nanocomposites with a myriad of Pd(100)/SnO2 interfaces were obtained by a newly developed successive seeded growth strategy, wherein pre-formed SnO2 nanospheres are used as seeds for two-round overgrowth of multitudinous Pd nanocubes. Using electron microscopic, electrochemical, spectroscopic and computational analyses, we found that the Pd(100)/SnO2 interfaces induce lattice contraction and electron loss on Pd nanocubes, which optimize intermediate binding during FAO. Moreover, we showed that the good cubicity of the Pd nanocubes and the presence of SnO2 nearby further promote the activity by facilitating the potential-determining step and the elimination of the poisoning CO intermediate, respectively. As such, the combined high intrinsic activity and number density of Pd(100)/SnO2 interfaces enabled the superior activity of the Pd/SnO2 nanocomposites. The composite material presented here holds promise for application in DFAFCs, but equally importantly, the insights regarding the structure-performance relationship would be beneficial for designing efficient metal/oxide composite catalysts for diverse electro- and photo-catalytic reactions.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts · Advanced battery technologies research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Dynamics and Control, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Institute of Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Chongqing 400044, China

Advanced Membranes and Porous Materials Center, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities · Thousand Young Talents Program of China · Venture and Innovation Support Program for Chongqing Overseas Returnees · Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing

References (66)

Show source-provided references
1. Fang · Nanoscale Adv. · 2021 · 3 · 9410.1039/D0NA00803F ↗
2. Yu · J. Power Sources · 2008 · 182 · 12410.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.03.075 ↗
3. Aslam · APCBEE Proc. · 2012 · 3 · 3310.1016/j.apcbee.2012.06.042 ↗
4. Cuesta · ACS Catal. · 2012 · 2 · 72810.1021/cs200661z ↗
5. Uhm · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2009 · 11 · 932610.1039/b909525j ↗
6. Shen · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2022 · 32 · 210767210.1002/adfm.202107672 ↗
7. Jiang · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2014 · 16 · 2036010.1039/C4CP03151B ↗
8. Betts · ACS Catal. · 2020 · 10 · 812010.1021/acscatal.0c00791 ↗
9. Miyake · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2008 · 10 · 366210.1039/b805955a ↗
10. Ferre-Vilaplana · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2017 · 5 · 2177310.1039/C7TA07116G ↗
11. Xi · Nano Lett. · 2017 · 17 · 272710.1021/acs.nanolett.7b00870 ↗
12. Choi · ChemCatChem · 2015 · 7 · 207710.1002/cctc.201500094 ↗
13. Luo · Adv. Mater. · 2019 · 31 · e190368310.1002/adma.201903683 ↗
14. Chen · ACS Catal. · 2021 · 11 · 223510.1021/acscatal.0c05370 ↗
15. Shen · Energy Fuels · 2020 · 34 · 913710.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c01820 ↗
16. Han · Coord. Chem. Rev. · 2021 · 445 · 21408510.1016/j.ccr.2021.214085 ↗
17. Guo · ChemElectroChem · 2022 · e20220072910.1002/celc.202200729 ↗
18. Hossain · Chem. Rev. · 2022 · e202200045
19. Hammer · Surf. Sci. · 1995 · 343 · 21110.1016/0039-6028(96)80007-0 ↗
20. Hoshi · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2006 · 110 · 1248010.1021/jp0608372 ↗
21. Yu · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2010 · 132 · 1825810.1021/ja107405x ↗
22. Zhou · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2008 · 112 · 378910.1021/jp077068m ↗
23. Yu · ACS Catal. · 2019 · 9 · 314410.1021/acscatal.8b04741 ↗
24. Zhang · Nanoscale · 2013 · 5 · 839210.1039/c3nr03100d ↗
25. Jin · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2012 · 5 · 635210.1039/C2EE02866B ↗
26. Chang · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2014 · 53 · 12210.1002/anie.201308620 ↗
27. Liu · Sci. Adv. · 2016 · e160085810.1126/sciadv.1600858 ↗
28. Xiao · Chem. Commun. · 2019 · 55 · 1195210.1039/C9CC05915F ↗
29. Liu · Nano Res. · 2016 · 9 · 159010.1007/s12274-016-1053-6 ↗
30. Jana · J. Power Sources · 2016 · 301 · 16010.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.09.114 ↗
31. Liu · Nano Res. · 2018 · 11 · 468610.1007/s12274-018-2051-7 ↗
32. Lu · J. Power Sources · 2012 · 215 · 4810.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.05.003 ↗
33. Yue · RSC Adv. · 2016 · 6 · 1931410.1039/C5RA26994F ↗
34. Hung · Electrochim. Acta · 2010 · 55 · 211610.1016/j.electacta.2009.11.043 ↗
35. Wang · RSC Adv. · 2016 · 6 · 6040010.1039/C6RA10176C ↗
36. Kabiraz · Chem. Mater. · 2019 · 31 · 566310.1021/acs.chemmater.9b01561 ↗
37. Xi · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2017 · 139 · 1519110.1021/jacs.7b08643 ↗
38. Vidal-Iglesias · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2012 · 14 · 1025810.1039/c2cp40992e ↗
39. Zheng · ChemCatChem · 2015 · 7 · 382610.1002/cctc.201500774 ↗
40. Xie · Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. · 2013 · 2 · 14210.1016/j.coche.2013.02.003 ↗
41. Miller · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2016 · 55 · 600410.1002/anie.201600647 ↗
42. Liu · Science · 2016 · 352 · 79710.1126/science.aaf5251 ↗
43. Feng · Chem. Commun. · 2012 · 48 · 41910.1039/C1CC16522D ↗
44. Zhou · J. Catal. · 2021 · 399 · 810.1016/j.jcat.2021.04.024 ↗
45. Rettenmaier · ACS Catal. · 2020 · 10 · 1454010.1021/acscatal.0c03212 ↗
46. Farmer · Science · 2010 · 329 · 93310.1126/science.1191778 ↗
47. Lykhach · Nat. Mater. · 2016 · 15 · 28410.1038/nmat4500 ↗
48. Vayssilov · Nat. Mater. · 2011 · 10 · 31010.1038/nmat2976 ↗
49. Graciani · Science · 2014 · 345 · 54610.1126/science.1253057 ↗
50. Lee · ACS Energy Lett. · 2019 · 4 · 224110.1021/acsenergylett.9b01721 ↗
51. Mangione · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2019 · 10 · 425910.1021/acs.jpclett.9b01471 ↗
52. Yu · J. Energy Chem. · 2021 · 58 · 25610.1016/j.jechem.2020.10.016 ↗
53. You · Nanoscale · 2021 · 13 · 1793910.1039/D1NR04993C ↗
54. Wang · Adv. Mater. · 2013 · 25 · 272810.1002/adma.201205168 ↗
55. Lambert · J. Chem. Phys. · 1991 · 94 · 623710.1063/1.460412 ↗
56. Iwasita · Prog. Surf. Sci. · 1997 · 55 · 27110.1016/S0079-6816(97)00032-4 ↗
57. Qin · New J. Chem. · 2019 · 43 · 1924210.1039/C9NJ04931B ↗
58. Rizo · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2018 · 140 · 379110.1021/jacs.8b00588 ↗
59. Miki · Chem. Commun. · 2002 · 150010.1039/b203392e ↗
60. Qin · ACS Catal. · 2020 · 10 · 392110.1021/acscatal.0c00225 ↗
61. Ferre-Vilaplana · ACS Catal. · 2015 · 5 · 64510.1021/cs501729j ↗
62. Huang · Nat. Commun. · 2018 · 9 · 311710.1038/s41467-018-05544-3 ↗
63. Huang · J. Energy Chem. · 2021 · 62 · 7110.1016/j.jechem.2021.03.009 ↗
64. Li · Chem. Synth. · 2022 · 2 · 910.20517/cs.2022.05 ↗
65. Varandili · ACS Catal. · 2019 · 9 · 503510.1021/acscatal.9b00010 ↗
66. Manjula · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2012 · 4 · 625210.1021/am301840s ↗