Single-cell force spectroscopy of fluid flow-tuned cell adhesion for dissecting hemodynamics in tumor metastasis
Source abstract
Abstract
Cell adhesion plays an important role in regulating the metastasis of cancer cells, and atomic force microscopy (AFM)-based single-cell force spectroscopy (SCFS) has become an important method to directly measure the adhesion forces of individual cells. Particularly, bodily fluid flow environments strongly affect the functions and behaviors of metastatic cells for successful dissemination. Nevertheless, the interactions between fluidic flow medium environment and cell adhesion remain poorly understood. In this work, AFM-based SCFS was exploited to examine the effects of fluidic flow environment on cellular adhesion. A fluidic cell culture medium device was used to simulate the fluidic flow environment experienced by cancer cells during metastasis, which was combined with AFM-based SCFS assay. A single living cancer cell was attached to the AFM tipless cantilever to prepare the single-cell probe for performing SCFS experiments on the mesothelial cells grown under the fluidic flow medium conditions, and the effects of experimental parameters (retraction speed, contact time, loading force) on the measured cellular adhesion forces were analyzed. Experimental results of SCFS assay show that cellular adhesion forces significantly decrease after growth in fluidic flow medium, whereas cellular adhesion forces increase after growth in static culture medium. Experiments performed with the use of spherical probes coated with cell adhesion-associated biomolecules also show the weakening of cell adhesion after growth in fluidic flow cell culture medium, which was subsequently confirmed by the confocal fluorescence microscopy experiments of cell adhesion molecules, vividly illustrating the remarkable effects of fluidic flow environment on cellular adhesion. The study provides a new approach to detect adhesion force dynamics involved in the interactions between cells and the fluidic flow environment at the single-cell level, which will facilitate dissecting the role of hemodynamics in tumor metastasis.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies · Cellular Mechanics and Interactions · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Robotics, Shenyang Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China
Institutes for Robotics and Intelligent Manufacturing, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110169, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Funding
Key Research Program of Frontier Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. B.Alberts , A.Johnson , J.Lewis , D.Morgan , M.Raff , K.Roberts and P.Walter , Molecular Biology of the Cell , Garland Science , New York , 6th edn, 2015
2. Gumbiner · Cell · 1996 · 84 · 34510.1016/S0092-8674(00)81279-9 ↗
3. Frantz · J. Cell Sci. · 2010 · 123 · 419510.1242/jcs.023820 ↗
4. Janiszewska · J. Biol. Chem. · 2020 · 295 · 249510.1074/jbc.REV119.007759 ↗
5. Cox · Nat. Rev. Cancer · 2021 · 21 · 21710.1038/s41568-020-00329-7 ↗
6. Arciola · Nat. Rev. Microbiol. · 2018 · 16 · 39710.1038/s41579-018-0019-y ↗
7. Kanchanawong · Nature · 2010 · 468 · 58010.1038/nature09621 ↗
8. Helenius · J. Cell Sci. · 2008 · 121 · 178510.1242/jcs.030999 ↗
9. Viljoen · Nat. Rev. Methods Primers · 2021 · 1 · 6310.1038/s43586-021-00062-x ↗
10. Friedrichs · Nat. Protoc. · 2010 · 5 · 135310.1038/nprot.2010.89 ↗
11. Beaussart · Nat. Protoc. · 2014 · 9 · 104910.1038/nprot.2014.066 ↗
12. Krieg · Nat. Rev. Phys. · 2019 · 1 · 4110.1038/s42254-018-0001-7 ↗
13. Dufrene · Nat. Rev. Microbiol. · 2020 · 18 · 22710.1038/s41579-019-0314-2 ↗
14. Hoffmann · J. Immunol. · 2011 · 186 · 275710.4049/jimmunol.1002867 ↗
15. Andolfi · PLoS One · 2014 · 9 · e11258210.1371/journal.pone.0112582 ↗
16. Azadi · Mol. Cell. Biochem. · 2016 · 423 · 12910.1007/s11010-016-2831-x ↗
17. Xie · PLoS One · 2018 · 13 · e020441810.1371/journal.pone.0204418 ↗
18. Liebsch · J. Mol. Recognit. · 2021 · 34 · e285410.1002/jmr.2854 ↗
19. Follain · Nat. Rev. Cancer · 2020 · 20 · 10710.1038/s41568-019-0221-x ↗
20. Bera · Nature · 2022 · 611 · 36510.1038/s41586-022-05394-6 ↗
21. Wei · Langmuir · 2023 · 39 · 130910.1021/acs.langmuir.2c03137 ↗
22. Valastyan · Cell · 2011 · 147 · 27510.1016/j.cell.2011.09.024 ↗
23. Reymond · Nat. Rev. Cancer · 2013 · 13 · 85810.1038/nrc3628 ↗
24. Mutsaers · Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. · 2004 · 36 · 910.1016/S1357-2725(03)00242-5 ↗
25. Friedrichs · Methods · 2013 · 60 · 16910.1016/j.ymeth.2013.01.006 ↗
26. Pankov · J. Cell Sci. · 2002 · 115 · 386110.1242/jcs.00059 ↗
27. Huber · Nat. Commun. · 2023 · 14 · 214310.1038/s41467-023-37760-x ↗
28. Zhu · Ann. Biomed. Eng. · 2008 · 36 · 60410.1007/s10439-008-9464-5 ↗
29. Hadjisavva · Cell Rep. · 2022 · 40 · 11109110.1016/j.celrep.2022.111091 ↗
30. Bonnans · Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. · 2014 · 15 · 78610.1038/nrm3904 ↗
31. Harburger · J. Cell Sci. · 2009 · 122 · 15910.1242/jcs.018093 ↗
32. van Roy · Nat. Rev. Cancer · 2014 · 14 · 12110.1038/nrc3647 ↗
33. Ganesh · Nat. Med. · 2021 · 27 · 3410.1038/s41591-020-01195-4 ↗
34. Lawson · Nature · 2015 · 526 · 13110.1038/nature15260 ↗
35. Tirosh · Science · 2016 · 352 · 18910.1126/science.aad0501 ↗
36. Jackson · Nature · 2020 · 578 · 61510.1038/s41586-019-1876-x ↗
37. Nia · Science · 2020 · 370 · eaaz086810.1126/science.aaz0868 ↗
38. Muller · Nat. Chem. Biol. · 2009 · 5 · 38310.1038/nchembio.181 ↗
39. Dufrene · Trends Microbiol. · 2015 · 23 · 37610.1016/j.tim.2015.01.011 ↗
40. Jun · Sci. Adv. · 2019 · 5 · eaax452010.1126/sciadv.aax4520 ↗