Quantification of mechanical stimuli inducing nucleoplasmic translocation of YAP and its distribution mechanism using an AFM–dSTORM coupled technique
Source abstract
Abstract
Cells can regulate a variety of behaviors by sensing mechanical signals, including growth, differentiation, apoptosis and so on. Yes-associated protein (YAP) is a mechanically sensitive protein that can be used as an indicator of mechanosignaling transduction. Unlike macroscopic statistical analysis, single-cell analysis is more demanding and challenging in terms of mechanistic regulation. Here, we quantified the location, amplitude and duration of single-cell mechanical stimulation by precise mechanical modulation, and simultaneously observed the mechanical force induced YAP nuclear and cytoplasmic distribution translocation using the AFM-dSTORM coupled techniques. Additionally, we investigated the regulation of YAP translocation according to the physical factors (cytoskeletal destruction and osmotic pressure) and biochemical factors (nuclear active transport protein inhibiter and starvation). Our study revealed that mechanical signals were transferred from the cytoskeleton to the nucleus through the synergistic action of microfilaments and microtubules, and then induced YAP translocation from the nucleus to the cytoplasm under the cooperation of nuclear export proteins. This conclusion deepens the understanding of the signaling pathway by which mechanical signals are transmitted from the plasma membrane to the cytoplasm and then to the nucleus to determine the cell's fate.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular Mechanics and Interactions · Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology · Hippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZ
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Electroanalytical Chemistry, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130022, Jilin, China
University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, Anhui, China
Laboratory for Marine Biology and Biotechnology, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Qingdao, 266237, Shandong, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Dupont · Nature · 2011 · 474 · 17910.1038/nature10137 ↗
2. Dasgupta · J. Biol. Chem. · 2019 · 294 · 1769310.1074/jbc.REV119.007963 ↗
3. Lin · Nature · 2019 · 573 · 23010.1038/s41586-019-1499-2 ↗
4. Coste · Nature · 2012 · 483 · 17610.1038/nature10812 ↗
5. Woo · Nat. Neurosci. · 2015 · 18 · 175610.1038/nn.4162 ↗
6. Dupont · Exp. Cell Res. · 2016 · 343 · 4210.1016/j.yexcr.2015.10.034 ↗
7. Moroishi · Nat. Rev. Cancer · 2015 · 15 · 7310.1038/nrc3876 ↗
8. Oliver-De La Cruz · Biomaterials · 2019 · 205 · 6410.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.03.009 ↗
9. Maller · Nat. Cell Biol. · 2013 · 15 · 57010.1038/ncb2777 ↗
10. Lee · Biomaterials · 2019 · 202 · 2610.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.02.021 ↗
11. Kofler · Nat. Commun. · 2018 · 9 · 496610.1038/s41467-018-07450-0 ↗
12. Cai · Front. Cell Dev. Biol. · 2021 · 9 · 67359910.3389/fcell.2021.673599 ↗
13. Gill · Nat. Commun. · 2018 · 9 · 351010.1038/s41467-018-05939-2 ↗
14. Murillo-Garzon · Nat. Rev. Urol. · 2017 · 14 · 68310.1038/nrurol.2017.144 ↗
15. Zhang · ACS Nano · 2021 · 15 · 1797710.1021/acsnano.1c06452 ↗
16. Jeong · J. Clin. Invest. · 2018 · 128 · 101010.1172/JCI95802 ↗
17. Mosqueira · ACS Nano · 2014 · 8 · 203310.1021/nn4058984 ↗
18. Pagliari · J. Tissue Eng. Regener. Med. · 2014 · 8 · 178
19. Bao · ACS Nano · 2021 · 15 · 1585810.1021/acsnano.1c03707 ↗
20. Elosegui-Artola · Cell · 2017 · 171 · 139710.1016/j.cell.2017.10.008 ↗
21. Seong · ACS Nano · 2020 · 14 · 537110.1021/acsnano.9b08689 ↗
22. Gao · Nanoscale · 2017 · 9 · 1699310.1039/C7NR05818G ↗
23. Gao · Nanoscale · 2020 · 12 · 270310.1039/C9NR09452K ↗
24. Shi · Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. · 2018 · 73 · 3110.1016/j.semcdb.2017.07.012 ↗
25. Puthenveedu · Cell · 2010 · 143 · 76110.1016/j.cell.2010.10.003 ↗
26. Zobiak · J. Microsc. · 2018 · 269 · 28210.1111/jmi.12626 ↗
27. van de Linde · Nat. Protoc. · 2011 · 6 · 99110.1038/nprot.2011.336 ↗
28. Rust · Nat. Methods · 2006 · 3 · 79310.1038/nmeth929 ↗
29. Han · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2017 · 114 · E6678
30. He · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2016 · 113 · 602910.1073/pnas.1605707113 ↗
31. Smith · Nature · 2012 · 492 · 29310.1038/492293a ↗
32. Hauser · Chem. Rev. · 2017 · 117 · 742810.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00604 ↗
33. Alsteens · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2017 · 12 · 17710.1038/nnano.2016.228 ↗
34. Zhou · Chin. J. Anal. Chem. · 2020 · 48 · 174
35. Zhou · Nanoscale · 2020 · 12 · 995010.1039/C9NR10931E ↗
36. Chacko · Cytoskeleton · 2013 · 70 · 72910.1002/cm.21139 ↗
37. Monserrate · ChemPhysChem · 2014 · 15 · 64710.1002/cphc.201300853 ↗
38. Levet · Nat. Methods · 2015 · 12 · 106510.1038/nmeth.3579 ↗
39. Hong · EMBO Rep. · 2017 · 18 · 7210.15252/embr.201642681 ↗
40. Fang · Cancer Cell · 2018 · 34 · 10310.1016/j.ccell.2018.06.002 ↗
41. Fornerod · Cell · 1997 · 90 · 105110.1016/S0092-8674(00)80371-2 ↗