Biomass derived self-assembled DNA-dot hydrogels for enhanced bacterial annihilation
Source abstract
Abstract
Nanotization of biomass for interesting biomedical applications is still in the nascent stage with no visible market available products. While products derived from biomass DNA and protein have unquestionable biocompatibility, induction of desired properties needs careful manipulation of the biomolecules. Herein, for the first time, we report the transformation of onion derived biomass DNA into DNA-dots through its partial hydrothermal pyrolysis to induce improved mechanical and photophysical properties. The DNA-dots were further used as crosslinkers to create a hydrogel through hybridization-mediated self-assembly with untransformed genomic DNA. The DNA dot-DNA hydrogel sustainably delivers the ciprofloxacin antibiotic as well as produces on-demand reactive oxygen species (ROS) with visible light irradiation. This prompted us to explore the hydrogel as a topical formulation for combination antibiotic Antibacterial-Photodynamic Therapy (APDT) applications. Remarkable annihilation of E. coli and S. aureus, and most importantly two drug-resistant strains of E. coli, shows the success of our sustainable approach.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials · Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques · Biosensors and Analytical Detection
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology Patna, Patna-801103, Bihar, India
Department of Biotechnology, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Hajipur-844102, Bihar, India
Division of Bacteriology, ICMR-National Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases, Kolkata, India
Funding
Indian Institute of Technology, Patna
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Gangrade · Nanoscale · 2021 · 13 · 1683410.1039/D1NR04475C ↗
2. Meng · ACS Nano · 2014 · 8 · 617110.1021/nn5015962 ↗
3. Song · Nanoscale · 2015 · 7 · 943310.1039/C5NR00858A ↗
4. Lee · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2012 · 7 · 81610.1038/nnano.2012.211 ↗
5. Samanta · Nanoscale · 2016 · 8 · 903710.1039/C5NR08465B ↗
6. Han · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2021 · 143 · 1948610.1021/jacs.1c08888 ↗
7. Wang · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2020 · 142 · 1011410.1021/jacs.0c02438 ↗
8. Peterson · Front. Microbiol. · 2018 · 9 · 292810.3389/fmicb.2018.02928 ↗
9. Bonamonte · Dermatol. Ther. · 2020 · 33 · 1382410.1111/dth.13824 ↗
10. Chen · J. Pharm. · 2016 · 2016 · 5754349
11. Williamson · Clin. Microbiol. Rev. · 2017 · 30 · 82710.1128/CMR.00112-16 ↗
12. Mohajeri · J. Photochem. Photobiol., B · 2020 · 209 · 11194410.1016/j.jphotobiol.2020.111944 ↗
13. Li · Nat. Mater. · 2004 · 3 · 3810.1038/nmat1045 ↗
14. Xiong · Macromol. Rapid Commun. · 2013 · 34 · 127110.1002/marc.201300411 ↗
15. Kahn · Acc. Chem. Res. · 2017 · 50 · 68010.1021/acs.accounts.6b00542 ↗
16. Hu · Angew. Chem. · 2016 · 128 · 428210.1002/ange.201511201 ↗
17. Lu · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2015 · 137 · 1572310.1021/jacs.5b06510 ↗
18. Jiang · ACS Appl. Bio Mater. · 2019 · 2 · 126210.1021/acsabm.8b00818 ↗
19. Obuobi · J. Controlled Release · 2019 · 313 · 12010.1016/j.jconrel.2019.10.013 ↗
20. Cao · Chem. Commun. · 2013 · 49 · 557410.1039/c3cc42397b ↗
21. Kumari · J. Photochem. Photobiol., B · 2017 · 172 · 2810.1016/j.jphotobiol.2017.05.010 ↗
22. Nayak · ACS Appl. Bio Mater. · 2020 · 3 · 786510.1021/acsabm.0c01022 ↗
23. Kumari · J. Colloid Interface Sci. · 2019 · 553 · 22810.1016/j.jcis.2019.06.034 ↗
24. Zhou · J. Mater. Chem. B · 2020 · 8 · 199110.1039/C9TB02716E ↗
25. Morya · ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. · 2020 · 6 · 602110.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c01125 ↗
26. Pandey · J. Mater. Chem. B · 2020 · 8 · 127710.1039/C9TB01863H ↗
27. Singh · Carbon · 2017 · 114 · 16910.1016/j.carbon.2016.12.020 ↗
28. Kou · Oncotarget · 2017 · 8 · 8159110.18632/oncotarget.20189 ↗
29. Kennedy · J. Photochem. Photobiol., B · 1992 · 14 · 27510.1016/1011-1344(92)85108-7 ↗
30. Sun · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2016 · 4 · 416110.1039/C5TA10027E ↗
31. Wang · Polymers · 2019 · 11 · 61610.3390/polym11040616 ↗
32. Suram · NeuroMol. Med. · 2002 · 2 · 28910.1385/NMM:2:3:289 ↗
33. Nayak · ACS Omega · 2021 · 6 · 2142510.1021/acsomega.1c02247 ↗
34. Xia · Adv. Sci. · 2019 · 6 · 190131610.1002/advs.201901316 ↗
35. Sharma · ACS Appl. Bio Mater. · 2019 · 2 · 531310.1021/acsabm.9b00570 ↗
36. Kumar · Int. J. Nanomed. · 2019 · 14 · 607310.2147/IJN.S196421 ↗
37. Cieplik · Crit. Rev. Microbiol. · 2018 · 44 · 57110.1080/1040841X.2018.1467876 ↗
38. Kim · Photochem. Photobiol. · 2020 · 96 · 28010.1111/php.13219 ↗
39. Ptaszyńska · Int. J. Mol. Sci. · 2020 · 21 · 469610.3390/ijms21134696 ↗
40. Singh · Sens. Actuators, B · 2018 · 255 · 76310.1016/j.snb.2017.08.100 ↗
41. Bush · Appl. Sci. · 2021 · 11 · 188510.3390/app11041885 ↗