journal article·2022

Ag@Pd bimetallic structures for enhanced electrocatalytic CO 2 conversion to CO: an interplay between the strain effect and ligand effect

Zuolong Chen, Xiyang Wang, Lei Wang, Yimin A. Wu

Nanoscale· Volume 14· Issue 31
Publisher page

Abstract

Electrochemical CO2 reduction reactions provide a promising path to effectively convert CO2 into valuable chemicals and fuels for industries. Among the many CO2 conversion catalysts, Pd stands out as a promising catalyst for effective CO2 to CO conversion. Here, using the misfit strain strategy, Ag@Pd bimetallic nanoparticles with different Pd overlayer contents were prepared as CO2 reduction catalysts. By varying the Pd overlayer content, all the Ag@Pd bimetallic nanoparticles exhibited superior CO2 conversion performance over their Pd and Ag nanoparticle counterparts. An optimal Pd-to-Ag ratio of 1.5 : 1 yielded the highest CO faradaic efficiency of 94.3% at -0.65 V vs. RHE with a high CO specific current density of 3.9 mA cm-2. It was found that the Pd content can substantially affect the interplay between the strain effect and ligand effect, resulting in optimized binding properties of the reaction intermediates on the catalyst surface, thereby enhancing the CO2 reduction performance.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Advanced battery technologies research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, Waterloo Institute for Nanotechnology, Materials Interfaces Foundry, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. Cox · Nature · 2000 · 408 · 18410.1038/35041539 ↗
2. K. L.Denman , G.Brasseur , A.Chidthaisong , P.Ciais , P. M.Cox , R. E.Dickinson , D.Hauglustaine , C.Heinze , E.Holland , D.Jacob , U.Lohmann , S.Ramachandran , P. L.da Silva Dias , S. C.Wofsy and X.Zhang , Couplings Between Changes in the Climate System and Biogeochemistry , in Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , ed. S. Solomon , D. Qin , M. Manning , Z. Chen , M. Marquis , K. B. Averyt , M. Tignor and H. L. Miller , Cambridge University Press , Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA , 2007
3. Peter · ACS Energy Lett. · 2018 · 3 · 155710.1021/acsenergylett.8b00878 ↗
4. Chen · Nanoscale · 2021 · 13 · 1971210.1039/D1NR06196H ↗
5. Verma · ChemSusChem · 2016 · 9 · 197210.1002/cssc.201600394 ↗
6. Salvatore · ACS Energy Lett. · 2018 · 3 · 14910.1021/acsenergylett.7b01017 ↗
7. Li · Small · 2021 · 210224410.1002/smll.202102244 ↗
8. Kim · ACS Catal. · 2021 · 11 · 666210.1021/acscatal.0c05671 ↗
9. Jansonius · Acs Energy Lett. · 2019 · 4 · 98010.1021/acsenergylett.9b00191 ↗
10. Birhanu · Electrochim. Acta · 2020 · 356 · 1010.1016/j.electacta.2020.136756 ↗
11. Xia · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2019 · 48 · 326510.1039/C8CS00846A ↗
12. Mavrikakis · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1998 · 81 · 281910.1103/PhysRevLett.81.2819 ↗
13. Zhao · Adv. Mater. · 2020 · 32 · 200414210.1002/adma.202004142 ↗
14. Jocelyn · Nanoscale Adv. · 2020 · 2 · 110510.1039/D0NA00061B ↗
15. Du · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2021 · 9 · 493310.1039/D0TA08880C ↗
16. Huang · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2017 · 56 · 359410.1002/anie.201612617 ↗
17. Strasser · Nat. Chem. · 2010 · 2 · 45410.1038/nchem.623 ↗
18. Cho · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2014 · 118 · 2255310.1021/jp5050817 ↗
19. Yang · Electrochem. Commun. · 2021 · 123 · 10691710.1016/j.elecom.2021.106917 ↗
20. Tedsree · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2011 · 6 · 30210.1038/nnano.2011.42 ↗
21. Li · ChemCatChem · 2017 · 9 · 92410.1002/cctc.201601119 ↗
22. Wang · Nanoscale · 2013 · 5 · 285710.1039/c3nr33584d ↗
23. Wang · Appl. Catal., B · 2021 · 288 · 11999910.1016/j.apcatb.2021.119999 ↗
24. Zhao · Nanoscale · 2020 · 12 · 1397310.1039/D0NR03374J ↗
25. Vorontsov · Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. · 2018 · 57 · 252610.1021/acs.iecr.7b04480 ↗
26. Toyoshima · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2012 · 116 · 1869110.1021/jp301636u ↗
27. Chen · Sci. Rep. · 2015 · 5 · 1194910.1038/srep11949 ↗
28. Liu · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 1994 · 49 · 447810.1103/PhysRevB.49.4478 ↗
29. Hansen · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2013 · 4 · 38810.1021/jz3021155 ↗
30. Liu · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2020 · 22 · 960010.1039/D0CP01042A ↗
31. Salehi-Khojin · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2013 · 117 · 162710.1021/jp310509z ↗
32. Gao · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2015 · 137 · 428810.1021/jacs.5b00046 ↗
33. Zhang · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2014 · 136 · 173410.1021/ja4113885 ↗
34. Deng · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2019 · 141 · 291110.1021/jacs.8b13786 ↗
35. Innocenti · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2014 · 161 · D301810.1149/2.003407jes ↗
36. Zhu · RSC Adv. · 2017 · 7 · 155310.1039/C6RA24754G ↗
37. Gohda · J. Electroanal. Chem. · 2007 · 607 · 4710.1016/j.jelechem.2006.10.015 ↗
38. Xie · J. Energy Chem. · 2021 · 63 · 27810.1016/j.jechem.2021.09.008 ↗
39. Sultan · J. Energy Chem. · 2021 · 60 · 41010.1016/j.jechem.2021.01.043 ↗
40. Dai · J. Energy Chem. · 2021 · 61 · 28110.1016/j.jechem.2021.01.009 ↗
41. Zhang · ACS Catal. · 2014 · 4 · 374210.1021/cs5012298 ↗
42. Xie · Appl. Catal., B · 2021 · 289 · 11978310.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119783 ↗