Magnetic micromotors crossing lipid membranes
Source abstract
Abstract
Nano/micromotors are self-propelled particles that show enhanced motion upon being triggered by a stimulus. Their use in nanomedicine has been widely explored, with special focus on imaging or drug delivery. However, a thorough understanding of the requirements for more efficient locomotion is still lacking. In this paper, we assembled magnetically propelled motors of different sizes (i.e., 0.5, 1 and 4 μm) and surface chemistries (positive charge or PEGylated) and assessed their motion in the presence of giant unilamellar lipid vesicles (GUVs) of varying compositions (zwitterionic, negatively charged and saturated lipids). Unexpectedly, the size does not seem to be the dominating characteristics that governs the ability of the motors to cross lipid membranes. Specifically, the 0.5 μm PEGylated motors have very limited ability to cross the lipid membrane of GUVs due to their non-interacting nature compared to their equally sized positively charged counterparts. Furthermore, membranes made of saturated lipids and, in particular, in combination with a weak magnetic field facilitate motors' crossing, regardless of their size. The results were validated by in-house data-driven statistical analysis that employs experimental data to allow for the identification of individual motor motion in the ensemble when meeting the lipid membranes. Altogether, we provide insight into motor locomotion when they interact with a biological barrier considering both the entire ensemble and the individual motors, which has the potential to support considerations of future motor designs.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Micro and Nano Robotics · Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies · Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Interdisciplinary Nanoscience Center (iNANO), Aarhus University, Gustav Wieds Vej 14, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark
Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Southampton, SO16 7QF, Southampton, UK
Funding
Carlsbergfondet · Lundbeck Foundation
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. Ghosh · Nano Today · 2020 · 31 · 10083610.1016/j.nantod.2019.100836 ↗
2. van Moolenbroek · Adv. Intell. Syst. · 2020 · 2 · 200008710.1002/aisy.202000087 ↗
3. Rastmanesh · Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. · 2021 · 6 · 56610.1039/D1ME00065A ↗
4. Lv · Appl. Mater. Today · 2021 · 23 · 10103410.1016/j.apmt.2021.101034 ↗
5. Wang · Interdiscip. Mater. · 2022 · 1 · 25610.1002/idm2.12021 ↗
6. Venugopalan · ACS Nano · 2020 · 14 · 942310.1021/acsnano.0c05217 ↗
7. Yuan · Bioact. Mater. · 2021 · 6 · 1727
8. Arqué · Chem. Sci. · 2022 · 13 · 912810.1039/D2SC01806C ↗
9. Lv · Micromachines · 2022 · 13 · 30710.3390/mi13020307 ↗
10. Fernández-Medina · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2020 · 30 · 110.1002/adfm.201908283 ↗
11. Ramos Docampo · Adv. Biol. · 2023 · 7 · 220030810.1002/adbi.202200308 ↗
12. Xiao · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2019 · 11 · 666710.1021/acsami.8b13103 ↗
13. Mou · iScience · 2019 · 19 · 41510.1016/j.isci.2019.07.050 ↗
14. Yuan · Adv. Intell. Syst. · 2021 · 3 · 210000210.1002/aisy.202100002 ↗
15. Yang · Sci. Adv. · 2023 · 9 · eadk725110.1126/sciadv.adk7251 ↗
16. Ramos-Docampo · J. Colloid Interface Sci. · 2022 · 629 · 28710.1016/j.jcis.2022.08.154 ↗
17. Docampo · Adv. Mater. Interfaces · 2022 · 2201509
18. Tezel · J. Drug Targeting · 2020 · 29 · 2910.1080/1061186X.2020.1797052 ↗
19. Del Valle · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2020 · 12 · 3123510.1021/acsami.0c08184 ↗
20. Liu · ACS Nano · 2019 · 13 · 1022110.1021/acsnano.9b03434 ↗
21. Singhal · Nanoscale Adv. · 2021 · 3 · 663510.1039/D1NA00578B ↗
22. Zhang · NPG Asia Mater. · 2021 · 13 · 5210.1038/s41427-021-00320-0 ↗
23. Sharma · Soft Matter · 2021 · 17 · 427510.1039/D0SM02183K ↗
24. Winkens · Small · 2023 · 220680010.1002/smll.202206800 ↗
25. Takagi · Soft Matter · 2014 · 10 · 178410.1039/c3sm52815d ↗
26. Spagnolie · Soft Matter · 2015 · 11 · 339610.1039/C4SM02785J ↗
27. Spagnolie · J. Fluid Mech. · 2012 · 700 · 10510.1017/jfm.2012.101 ↗
28. Desai · Soft Matter · 2018 · 14 · 26410.1039/C7SM01615H ↗
29. Song · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2022 · 144 · 1383110.1021/jacs.2c05232 ↗
30. Tinevez · Methods · 2017 · 115 · 8010.1016/j.ymeth.2016.09.016 ↗
31. Rawicz · Biophys. J. · 2000 · 79 · 32810.1016/S0006-3495(00)76295-3 ↗
32. Olbrich · Biophys. J. · 2000 · 79 · 32110.1016/S0006-3495(00)76294-1 ↗
33. Fischer-Cripps · J. Mater. Sci. · 1999 · 34 · 12910.1023/A:1004490230078 ↗
34. Sousa De Almeida · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2021 · 50 · 539710.1039/D0CS01127D ↗
35. Rennick · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2021 · 16 · 26610.1038/s41565-021-00858-8 ↗
36. Strobl · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2019 · 52 · 29400110.1088/1361-6463/ab1994 ↗
37. Contini · Commun. Chem. · 2020 · 3 · 110.1038/s42004-020-00377-y ↗
38. Qiao · Nat. Chem. · 2017 · 9 · 11010.1038/nchem.2617 ↗
39. Gao · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2022 · 144 · 385510.1021/jacs.1c11414 ↗
40. Dunn · Am. J. Physiol.: Cell Physiol. · 2011 · 300 · 72310.1152/ajpcell.00462.2010 ↗
41. De Dios Andres · Nanoscale · 2021 · 13 · 1790010.1039/D1NR06221B ↗
42. de Dios Andres · Small · 2022 · 19 · 220125110.1002/smll.202201251 ↗
43. Parasassi · Biophys. J. · 1991 · 60 · 17910.1016/S0006-3495(91)82041-0 ↗
44. Jay · J. Fluoresc. · 2017 · 27 · 24310.1007/s10895-016-1951-8 ↗
45. Tarantino · J. Cell Biol. · 2014 · 204 · 23110.1083/jcb.201307172 ↗