journal article·2023

Two dimensional materials are non-nanotoxic and biocompatible towards cyclotides: evidence from classical molecular dynamics simulations

Anupam Ghosh, Titas Kumar Mukhopadhyay, Ayan Datta

Nanoscale· Volume 15· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Cyclotides are backbone-cyclized peptides of plant origin enriched with disulfide bonds, having exceptional stability towards thermal denaturation and proteolytic degradation. They have a plethora of activities like antibacterial, antifungal, anti-tumor and anti-HIV properties predominantly owing to their selective interaction with certain phospholipids, thereby leading to the disruption of cellular membranes. On the other hand, low-dimensional materials like graphene and hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN) are also known to show membrane-proliferating activities through lipid extraction. A plausible and more effective antibacterial, anti-tumor and antifungal agent would be a composite of these 2D materials and cyclotides, provided the structures of the peptides remain unperturbed upon adsorption and interaction. In this study, classical molecular dynamics simulations are performed to understand the nature of adsorption of cyclotides belonging to different families on graphene and h-BN and analyze the resulting structural changes. It is revealed that, due to their exceptional structural stability, cyclotides maintain their structural integrity upon adsorption on the 2D materials. In addition, the aggregated states of the cyclotides, which are ubiquitous in plant organs, are also not disrupted upon adsorption. Extensive free energy calculations show that the adsorption strength of the cyclotides is moderate in comparison to those of other similar-sized biomolecules, and the larger the size of the aggregates, the weaker the binding of individual peptides with the 2D materials, thereby leading to their lower release times from the materials. It is predicted that graphene and h-BN may safely be used for the preparation of composites with cyclotides, which in turn may be envisaged to be probable candidates for manufacturing next-generation bionano agents for agricultural, antibacterial and therapeutic applications.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Biochemical and Structural Characterization · Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research · Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Chemical Sciences, Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science, Jadavpur – 700032, West Bengal, India

Funding

Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India · Science and Engineering Research Board

References (61)

Show source-provided references
1. Craik · J. Mol. Biol. · 1999 · 294 · 132710.1006/jmbi.1999.3383 ↗
2. Craik · Science · 2006 · 311 · 156310.1126/science.1125248 ↗
3. Craik · Lett. Pept. Sci. · 2001 · 8 · 11910.1023/A:1016262020925 ↗
4. Colgrave · Biochemistry · 2004 · 43 · 596510.1021/bi049711q ↗
5. Simonsen · Plant Cell · 2005 · 17 · 317610.1105/tpc.105.034678 ↗
6. Göransson · J. Biol. Chem. · 2003 · 278 · 4818810.1074/jbc.M308771200 ↗
7. Nguyen · J. Biol. Chem. · 2011 · 286 · 2427510.1074/jbc.M111.229922 ↗
8. Gracy · Nucleic Acids Res. · 2007 · 36 · 31410.1093/nar/gkm939 ↗
9. Pinto · J. Biol. Chem. · 2012 · 287 · 13410.1074/jbc.M111.294009 ↗
10. Barbeta · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2008 · 105 · 122110.1073/pnas.0710338104 ↗
11. Pinto · J. Nat. Prod. · 2018 · 81 · 120310.1021/acs.jnatprod.7b00969 ↗
12. Du · J. Biol. Chem. · 2020 · 295 · 1091110.1074/jbc.RA120.012627 ↗
13. Jennings · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2001 · 98 · 1061410.1073/pnas.191366898 ↗
14. Ireland · Pept. Sci. · 2007 · 50 · 51
15. Gilding · New Phytol. · 2016 · 210 · 71710.1111/nph.13789 ↗
16. Pränting · J. Antimicrob. Chemother. · 2010 · 65 · 196410.1093/jac/dkq220 ↗
17. Jagadish · Pept. Sci. · 2010 · 94 · 61110.1002/bip.21433 ↗
18. Henriques · Drug Discovery Today · 2010 · 15 · 5710.1016/j.drudis.2009.10.007 ↗
19. Ojeda · Drug Discovery Today · 2019 · 24 · 215210.1016/j.drudis.2019.09.010 ↗
20. Jayakumar · Int. J. Pharm. · 2018 · 551 · 30910.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.09.041 ↗
21. Taylor-Pashow · Chem. Commun. · 2010 · 46 · 583210.1039/c002073g ↗
22. Mas-Ballesté · Nanoscale · 2011 · 3 · 2010.1039/C0NR00323A ↗
23. Chen · Prog. Polym. Sci. · 2016 · 53 · 8610.1016/j.progpolymsci.2015.02.004 ↗
24. Kurapati · Adv. Mater. · 2016 · 28 · 605210.1002/adma.201506306 ↗
25. Jimenez-Cruz · Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Syst. Biol. Med. · 2014 · 6 · 329
26. Z.Ruhong , Modeling of nanotoxicity: Molecular interactions of nanomaterials with bionanomachines , 2015 , pp. 1–189
27. Lim · ChemNanoMat · 2016 · 3 · 5
28. Friedrichs · Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. · 2007 · 8 · 1210.1016/j.stam.2006.11.020 ↗
29. Nel · Acc. Chem. Res. · 2013 · 46 · 60510.1021/ar400005v ↗
30. Fojtů · Environ. Sci.: Nano · 2017 · 4 · 1617
31. Hu · ACS Nano · 2010 · 4 · 431710.1021/nn101097v ↗
32. Akhavan · ACS Nano · 2010 · 4 · 573110.1021/nn101390x ↗
33. Feng · J. Chem. Phys. · 2016 · 144 · 22510210.1063/1.4953562 ↗
34. Luan · ACS Nano · 2015 · 9 · 66310.1021/nn506011j ↗
35. Horváth · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 380010.1021/nn200139h ↗
36. Mateti · Nano Res. · 2018 · 11 · 33410.1007/s12274-017-1635-y ↗
37. Mukhopadhyay · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2018 · 10 · 1380510.1021/acsami.8b00494 ↗
38. Mukhopadhyay · Nanoscale · 2020 · 12 · 70310.1039/C9NR05930J ↗
39. Mukhopadhyay · ACS Appl. Nano Mater. · 2021 · 4 · 309510.1021/acsanm.1c00271 ↗
40. Li · Carbon · 2019 · 146 · 25710.1016/j.carbon.2019.01.107 ↗
41. Lei · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2021 · 125 · 347610.1021/acs.jpcb.0c10513 ↗
42. Trabi · Plant Cell · 2004 · 16 · 220410.1105/tpc.104.021790 ↗
43. Rosengren · J. Biol. Chem. · 2003 · 278 · 860610.1074/jbc.M211147200 ↗
44. Mukhopadhyay · ChemPhysChem · 2020 · 21 · 183610.1002/cphc.202000385 ↗
45. Feller · J. Chem. Phys. · 1995 · 103 · 461310.1063/1.470648 ↗
46. Davidchack · J. Chem. Phys. · 2009 · 130 · 23410110.1063/1.3149788 ↗
47. Farago · Phys. A · 2019 · 534 · 12221010.1016/j.physa.2019.122210 ↗
48. Andersen · J. Comput. Phys. · 1983 · 52 · 2410.1016/0021-9991(83)90014-1 ↗
49. Kalé · J. Comput. Phys. · 1999 · 151 · 28310.1006/jcph.1999.6201 ↗
50. Humphrey · J. Mol. Graphics · 1996 · 14 · 3310.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 ↗
51. Jorgensen · J. Chem. Phys. · 1983 · 79 · 92610.1063/1.445869 ↗
52. Mukhopadhyay · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2017 · 121 · 81110.1021/acs.jpcc.6b09446 ↗
53. Mukhopadhyay · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2017 · 121 · 1021010.1021/acs.jpcc.7b02480 ↗
54. Mukhopadhyay · J. Indian Chem. Soc. · 2019 · 96 · 753
55. Mukhopadhyay · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2020 · 22 · 2215710.1039/D0CP03128C ↗
56. Darve · J. Chem. Phys. · 2008 · 128 · 14412010.1063/1.2829861 ↗
57. Darve · J. Chem. Phys. · 2001 · 115 · 916910.1063/1.1410978 ↗
58. Mukhopadhyay · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2018 · 122 · 2891810.1021/acs.jpcc.8b08839 ↗
59. Hughes · J. Mater. Chem. B · 2015 · 3 · 321110.1039/C5TB00004A ↗
60. Lee · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2013 · 117 · 1343510.1021/jp402403f ↗
61. Shakourian-Fard · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2014 · 118 · 2600310.1021/jp506277n ↗