Nonlinear detour phase holography
Source abstract
Abstract
Nonlinear photonic crystals are capable of highly efficient nonlinear wavefront manipulation, providing a promising platform for compact and large-scale integrated nonlinear devices. However, the current nonlinear encoding methods for nonlinear photonic crystals inherently require a number of disordered and complex microstructures, which are quite challenging in a real fabrication process. Herein we propose and experimentally demonstrate a nonlinear detour phase method for nonlinear wavefront manipulation in nonlinear photonic crystals. With the proposed method, the designed nonlinear detour phase hologram only requires a set of basic building blocks with simple shapes, which are easy to fabricate by using the femtosecond laser writing technique. The second-harmonic hologram is demonstrated by designing the nonlinear detour phase patterns, and the quasi-phase-matching scheme in the second-harmonic holographic imaging process is also discussed. This study conceptually extends the conventional detour phase method into the nonlinear regime, offering new possibilities for compact nonlinear micro-devices with multi-functions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics · Advanced Optical Imaging Technologies · Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics and School of Physics
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Wuhan 430074
China
School of Physics and Optoelectronics Engineering
Xidian University
Xi'an 710071
Laser Physics Center
Research School of Physics
Australian National University
Canberra
Australia
Guangdong Intelligent Robotics Institute
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · National Key Research and Development Program of China · Qatar National Research Fund
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. Berger · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1998 · 81 · 413610.1103/PhysRevLett.81.4136 ↗
2. Broderick · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2000 · 84 · 434510.1103/PhysRevLett.84.4345 ↗
3. Arie · Laser Photonics Rev. · 2010 · 4 · 35510.1002/lpor.200910006 ↗
4. Xu · Nat. Photonics · 2018 · 12 · 59110.1038/s41566-018-0225-1 ↗
5. Wei · Nat. Photonics · 2018 · 12 · 59610.1038/s41566-018-0240-2 ↗
6. Armstrong · Phys. Rev. · 1962 · 127 · 191810.1103/PhysRev.127.1918 ↗
7. Fejer · IEEE J. Quantum Electron. · 1992 · 28 · 263110.1109/3.161322 ↗
8. Qin · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 100 · 06390210.1103/PhysRevLett.100.063902 ↗
9. Bloch · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2012 · 108 · 23390210.1103/PhysRevLett.108.233902 ↗
10. Liu · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2020 · 116 · 05110410.1063/1.5141420 ↗
11. Roussev · Opt. Lett. · 2004 · 29 · 151810.1364/OL.29.001518 ↗
12. Mazzotti · Appl. Phys. B · 2000 · 70 · 74710.1007/s003400000263 ↗
13. Chatellus · Opt. Express · 2006 · 14 · 1006010.1364/OE.14.010060 ↗
14. Sheng · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 92 · 20111310.1063/1.2937210 ↗
15. Niu · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2020 · 116 · 10110410.1063/1.5142750 ↗
16. Wang · Optica · 2018 · 5 · 143810.1364/OPTICA.5.001438 ↗
17. Luo · Phys. Rev. A · 2019 · 99 · 06383310.1103/PhysRevA.99.063833 ↗
18. Lu · Opt. Express · 2015 · 23 · 120310.1364/OE.23.001203 ↗
19. Lu · Optica · 2019 · 6 · 145510.1364/OPTICA.6.001455 ↗
20. Wolf · Optica · 2018 · 5 · 87210.1364/OPTICA.5.000872 ↗
21. Chang · Optica · 2016 · 3 · 53110.1364/OPTICA.3.000531 ↗
22. Kurz · IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. · 2002 · 8 · 66010.1109/JSTQE.2002.1016370 ↗
23. Ellenbogen · Nat. Photonics · 2009 · 3 · 39510.1038/nphoton.2009.95 ↗
24. Liu · Nat. Commun. · 2019 · 10 · 320810.1038/s41467-019-11114-y ↗
25. Wei · Nat. Commun. · 2019 · 10 · 419310.1038/s41467-019-12251-0 ↗
26. Chen · Nanophotonics · 2018 · 7 · 101310.1515/nanoph-2018-0011 ↗
27. Li · Nat. Rev. Mater. · 2017 · 2 · 1701010.1038/natrevmats.2017.10 ↗
28. Hu · Nat. Photonics · 2019 · 13 · 46710.1038/s41566-019-0399-1 ↗
29. Hong · Research · 2020 · 2020 · 110.34133/2020/9085782 ↗
30. Yamada · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1993 · 62 · 43510.1063/1.108925 ↗
31. Chen · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2015 · 107 · 14110210.1063/1.4932199 ↗
32. Matsumoto · Electron. Lett. · 1991 · 27 · 204010.1049/el:19911263 ↗
33. Shur · Sci. Rep. · 2017 · 7 · 12510.1038/s41598-017-00172-1 ↗
34. Shapira · Opt. Lett. · 2012 · 37 · 213610.1364/OL.37.002136 ↗
35. Hong · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2014 · 113 · 16390210.1103/PhysRevLett.113.163902 ↗
36. Shapira · Laser Photonics Rev. · 2013 · 7 · L2510.1002/lpor.201300026 ↗
37. Shemer · Opt. Lett. · 2013 · 38 · 547010.1364/OL.38.005470 ↗
38. Pasiskevicius · Nat. Photonics · 2009 · 3 · 37410.1038/nphoton.2009.107 ↗
39. Trajtenberg-Mills · Optica · 2017 · 4 · 15310.1364/OPTICA.4.000153 ↗
40. Yang · Opt. Lett. · 2016 · 41 · 292710.1364/OL.41.002927 ↗
41. Brown · Appl. Opt. · 1966 · 5 · 96710.1364/AO.5.000967 ↗
42. Lohmann · Appl. Opt. · 1967 · 6 · 173910.1364/AO.6.001739 ↗
43. Gerchberg · Optik · 1972 · 35 · 1
44. Sheng · Opt. Express · 2010 · 18 · 1653910.1364/OE.18.016539 ↗
45. Scalora · Opt. Commun. · 1994 · 108 · 19110.1016/0030-4018(94)90647-5 ↗
46. Saltiel · Opt. Lett. · 2009 · 34 · 84810.1364/OL.34.000848 ↗
47. David · Phys. Status Solidi B · 2007 · 244 · 212710.1002/pssb.200642370 ↗
48. Burnham · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1970 · 25 · 8410.1103/PhysRevLett.25.84 ↗
49. Zhang · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2010 · 104 · 18390110.1103/PhysRevLett.104.183901 ↗
50. Molina · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2008 · 18 · 70910.1002/adfm.200700905 ↗
51. Trull · Opt. Express · 2007 · 15 · 1586810.1364/OE.15.015868 ↗