Graphene nanoribbons as flexible docks for chemiresistive sensing of gas phase explosives
Source abstract
Abstract
Interpretation of chemiresistive sensor measurements is made difficult by the fact that similar conductance changes may be produced by different adsorbed species. This fundamental ambiguity may be addressed by formulating a new docking paradigm. Instead of decorating graphene with ligands whose structure is well suited to bind with a particular target molecule, a generic dock in the form of a flexible, semiconducting graphene nanoribbon (GNR) may be employed. If the deformed shape of the GNR is then varied, via mechanical actuation, a two dimensional signature (sensor current versus bias voltage and GNR deformation) of the target molecule may be obtained. Ab initio modeling results indicate that this signature may be used to distinguish explosives from background gases and to discriminate between chemically similar explosives.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Energetic Materials and Combustion · Graphene research and applications · Mechanical and Optical Resonators
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering
University of Texas
Austin
USA
Funding
Office of Naval Research · University of Texas at Austin
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Donarelli · Sensors · 2018 · 18 · 363810.3390/s18113638 ↗
2. Meng · Chem. Rev. · 2019 · 119 · 47810.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00311 ↗
3. Singh · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2017 · 9 · 3454410.1021/acsami.7b07063 ↗
4. Chen · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 101 · 05311910.1063/1.4742327 ↗
5. Robinson · Nano Lett. · 2008 · 8 · 313710.1021/nl8013007 ↗
6. Liu · ACS Appl. Nano Mater. · 2019 · 540910.1021/acsanm.9b01038 ↗
7. Galstyana · Procedia Eng. · 2016 · 168 · 117210.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.395 ↗
8. Karaduman · J. Alloys Compd. · 2017 · 722 · 56910.1016/j.jallcom.2017.06.152 ↗
9. Cagliani · Nano Res. · 2014 · 7 · 74310.1007/s12274-014-0435-x ↗
10. Joshi · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2010 · 114 · 661010.1021/jp100343d ↗
11. Novikov · Sens. Actuators, B · 2016 · 236 · 105410.1016/j.snb.2016.05.114 ↗
12. Ghosh · Sens. Actuators, B · 2014 · 205 · 6710.1016/j.snb.2014.08.044 ↗
13. Zhang · ACS Appl. Nano Mater. · 2019 · 2 · 144510.1021/acsanm.8b02330 ↗
14. Senesac · Mater. Today · 2008 · 11 · 2810.1016/S1369-7021(08)70017-8 ↗
15. Meier · Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. · 2009 · 2 · 46310.1146/annurev-anchem-060908-155127 ↗
16. Parmar · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2015 · 107 · 11310810.1063/1.4931118 ↗
17. Morris · J. Comput. Chem. · 2009 · 30 · 278510.1002/jcc.21256 ↗
18. Yang · Nano Lett. · 2006 · 6 · 58310.1021/nl052134m ↗
19. Muckley · J. Photonics Energy · 2016 · 6 · 02550610.1117/1.JPE.6.025506 ↗
20. Boisen · Ultramicroscopy · 2000 · 82 · 1110.1016/S0304-3991(99)00148-5 ↗
21. Hanay · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2012 · 7 · 60210.1038/nnano.2012.119 ↗
22. Li · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 99310.1021/nn300356d ↗
23. Mu · Acc. Chem. Res. · 2014 · 6 · 97910.1021/ar400162w ↗
24. Muthoosamy · Curr. Drug Delivery · 2014 · 11 · 70110.2174/1567201811666140605151600 ↗
25. Zhang · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2019 · 123 · 2180510.1021/acs.jpcc.9b06717 ↗
26. Zhang · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2020 · 11 · 137810.1021/acs.jpclett.0c00047 ↗
27. Soler · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2002 · 14 · 2745
28. Stokbro · Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. · 2003 · 1006 · 21210.1196/annals.1292.014 ↗
29. Perdew · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1996 · 77 · 386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
30. Perdew · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 1981 · 23 · 504810.1103/PhysRevB.23.5048 ↗
31. Fowler · ACS Nano · 2009 · 3 · 30110.1021/nn800593m ↗
32. Romero · Nanotechnology · 2009 · 20 · 24550110.1088/0957-4484/20/24/245501 ↗
33. Dan · Nano Lett. · 2009 · 9 · 147210.1021/nl8033637 ↗
34. Niu · Trends Chem. · 2019 · 1 · 54910.1016/j.trechm.2019.06.008 ↗
35. Takashima · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 104 · 09310510.1063/1.4867473 ↗