Nano-beam and nano-target effects in ion radiation
Source abstract
Abstract
Full three dimensional (3D) simulations of ion implantation are necessary in a wide range of nanoscience and nanotechnology applications to capture the increasing effect of ion leakage out of surfaces. Using a recently developed 3D Monte Carlo simulation code IM3D, we first quantify the relative error of the 1D approach in three applications of nano-scale ion implantation: (1) nano-beam for nitrogen-vacancy (NV) center creation, (2) implantation of nanowires to fabricate p-n junctions, and (3) irradiation of nano-pillars for small-scale mechanical testing of irradiated materials. Because the 1D approach fails to consider the exchange and leakage of ions from boundaries, its relative error increases dramatically as the beam/target size shrinks. Lastly, the "Bragg peak" phenomenon, where the maximum radiation dose occurs at a finite depth away from the surface, relies on the assumption of broad beams. We discovered a topological transition of the point-defect or defect-cluster distribution isosurface when one varies the beam width, in agreement with a previous focused helium ion beam irradiation experiment. We conclude that full 3D simulations are necessary if either the beam or the target size is comparable or below the SRIM longitudinal ion range.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ion-surface interactions and analysis · Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies · Graphene research and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Cambridge
USA
Key Laboratory of Materials Physics
Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
Department of Materials Science and Engineering
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · National Science Foundation
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. Bayn · Nano Lett. · 2015 · 15 · 175110.1021/nl504441m ↗
2. Shinada · Nature · 2005 · 437 · 112810.1038/nature04086 ↗
3. Maletinsky · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2012 · 7 · 32010.1038/nnano.2012.50 ↗
4. Hoffmann · Nano Lett. · 2009 · 9 · 134110.1021/nl802977m ↗
5. Ziegler · Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B · 2010 · 268 · 181810.1016/j.nimb.2010.02.091 ↗
6. Was · Scr. Mater. · 2014 · 88 · 3310.1016/j.scriptamat.2014.06.003 ↗
7. Grotz · Nat. Commun. · 2012 · 3 · 72910.1038/ncomms1729 ↗
8. Watt · Mater. Today · 2007 · 10 · 2010.1016/S1369-7021(07)70129-3 ↗
9. Pekin · J. Microsc. · 2016 · 264 · 5910.1111/jmi.12416 ↗
10. Yao · Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B · 2013 · 306 · 26510.1016/j.nimb.2012.10.033 ↗
11. Economou · Scanning · 2012 · 34 · 8310.1002/sca.20239 ↗
12. Tan · J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B: Nanotechnol. Microelectron.: Mater., Process., Meas., Phenom. · 2011 · 29 · 06F604
13. Toyli · Nano Lett. · 2010 · 10 · 316810.1021/nl102066q ↗
14. Pezzagna · Phys. Status Solidi A · 2011 · 208 · 201710.1002/pssa.201100455 ↗
15. Pezzagna · Small · 2010 · 6 · 211710.1002/smll.201000902 ↗
16. Scarabelli · Nano Lett. · 2016 · 16 · 498210.1021/acs.nanolett.6b01692 ↗
17. Borschel · Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B · 2011 · 269 · 213310.1016/j.nimb.2011.07.004 ↗
18. Möller · Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B · 2014 · 322 · 2310.1016/j.nimb.2013.12.027 ↗
19. Li · Sci. Rep. · 2015 · 5 · 1813010.1038/srep18130 ↗
20. Schiettekatte · Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B · 2016 · 371 · 10610.1016/j.nimb.2015.09.089 ↗
21. Furukawa · Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 1972 · 11 · 13410.1143/JJAP.11.134 ↗
22. Runge · Phys. Status Solidi A · 1977 · 39 · 59510.1002/pssa.2210390228 ↗
23. Rishton · J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B: Microelectron. Nanometer Struct. – Process., Meas., Phenom. · 1987 · 5 · 13510.1116/1.583847 ↗
24. Mitsuishi · Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2006 · 45 · 551710.1143/JJAP.45.5517 ↗
25. Chang · J. Vac. Sci. Technol. · 1975 · 12 · 127110.1116/1.568515 ↗
26. Parikh · J. Appl. Phys. · 1979 · 50 · 437110.1063/1.326423 ↗
27. Eisenmann · J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B: Microelectron. Nanometer Struct. – Process., Meas., Phenom. · 1993 · 11 · 274110.1116/1.586594 ↗
28. Felten · ACS Nano · 2010 · 4 · 443110.1021/nn1002248 ↗
29. Krasheninnikov · J. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 107 · 07130110.1063/1.3318261 ↗
30. Li · Nature · 2001 · 412 · 16610.1038/35084037 ↗
31. Dai · Nano Lett. · 2016 · 16 · 365510.1021/acs.nanolett.6b00797 ↗
32. Nukala · Nat. Commun. · 2016 · 7 · 1048210.1038/ncomms10482 ↗
33. Dillen · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2014 · 9 · 11610.1038/nnano.2013.301 ↗
34. Cardellino · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2014 · 9 · 34310.1038/nnano.2014.39 ↗
35. Muhonen · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2014 · 9 · 98610.1038/nnano.2014.211 ↗
36. Gómez-Navarro · Nat. Mater. · 2005 · 4 · 53410.1038/nmat1414 ↗
37. Johannes · Semicond. Sci. Technol. · 2015 · 30 · 3300110.1088/0268-1242/30/3/033001 ↗
38. Borschel · Nano Lett. · 2011 · 11 · 393510.1021/nl2021653 ↗
39. Möller · Nanotechnology · 2016 · 27 · 17530110.1088/0957-4484/27/17/175301 ↗
40. Pelaz · Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. · 2017 · 62 · 6210.1016/j.mssp.2016.11.007 ↗
41. Liontas · Nano Lett. · 2014 · 14 · 517610.1021/nl502074d ↗
42. Kiener · Nat. Mater. · 2011 · 10 · 60810.1038/nmat3055 ↗
43. Short · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2015 · 1
44. Faney · Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2014 · 22 · 6501010.1088/0965-0393/22/6/065010 ↗
45. Tan · J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B: Nanotechnol. Microelectron.: Mater., Process., Meas., Phenom. · 2014 · 32 · 06FA01
46. Winston · Scanning · 2012 · 34 · 12110.1002/sca.20290 ↗
47. Ishimaru · J. Appl. Phys. · 1997 · 81 · 112610.1063/1.363857 ↗
48. Ding · Nano Lett. · 2016 · 16 · 411810.1021/acs.nanolett.6b00864 ↗
49. Li · Nucl. Fusion · 2017 · 57 · 01603810.1088/1741-4326/57/1/016038 ↗
50. Johannes · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 48 · 7950110.1088/0022-3727/48/7/079501 ↗
51. Hobler · Phys. Rev. B · 2016 · 93 · 20544310.1103/PhysRevB.93.205443 ↗