journal article·2022

Sequential galvanic replacement mediated Pd-doped hollow Ru–Te nanorods for enhanced hydrogen evolution reaction mass activity in alkaline media

Hojung Ahn, Sanghyuk Cho, Jung Tae Park, Hongje Jang

Nanoscale· Volume 14· Issue 40
Publisher page

Abstract

High catalytic activity, long-term stability, and economical Pt-free catalysts for the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) are required for the conversion of renewable energy systems. Noble nanomaterial Pt is a superior electrolysis catalyst for water splitting under typical experimental conditions with a relatively low overpotential. However, the use of Pt is limited by its high cost and activity degradation over time. Among several prospective alternatives, Ru has emerged as a promising alkaline electrolysis catalyst because of its significant catalytic activity and reduced cost compared to Pt. We designed and suggested Pd-doped hollow Ru-Te nanorods (PdRuTeNRs) via successive galvanic replacement reactions of sacrificial Te nanotemplates to further boost efficiency. The Pd/partially oxidized RuO2/Ru/Te hetero-interfaced composition exhibited an HER mass activity of 11.3 A g-1 Ru, twice that of Pt. In addition, the present PdRuTeNRs sufficiently maintained the activity from the 2000-cycle continuous test, greatly reducing the required cost by a quarter.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Advanced battery technologies research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry, Kwangwoon University, 20 Gwangwoon-ro, Nowon-gu, Seoul 01897, Republic of Korea

Department of Chemical Engineering, Konkuk University, 120 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea

Funding

Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning

References (54)

Show source-provided references
1. Navarro-Pardo · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2020 · 30 · 190846710.1002/adfm.201908467 ↗
2. Zhou · ChemSusChem · 2020 · 13 · 564710.1002/cssc.202001230 ↗
3. Cho · Energy Convers. Manage. · 2022 · 252 · 11503810.1016/j.enconman.2021.115038 ↗
4. Ha · Nanoscale · 2022 · 14 · 933110.1039/D2NR01800D ↗
5. Li · Nanoscale · 2022 · 14 · 625810.1039/D2NR00822J ↗
6. Yuan · Nanoscale · 2022 · 14 · 249010.1039/D1NR05941F ↗
7. Luo · Mater. Today Phys. · 2020 · 15 · 10027410.1016/j.mtphys.2020.100274 ↗
8. Li · ACS Omega · 2020 · 5 · 3110.1021/acsomega.9b03550 ↗
9. Bae · Nanoscale Horiz. · 2020 · 5 · 4310.1039/C9NH00485H ↗
10. Zhang · J. Power Sources · 2020 · 471 · 22844610.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228446 ↗
11. Panfil · Angew. Chem. · 2018 · 130 · 435410.1002/ange.201708510 ↗
12. Astruc · Chem. Rev. · 2020 · 120 · 46110.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00696 ↗
13. Lee · Nat. Commun. · 2021 · 12 · 427110.1038/s41467-021-24578-8 ↗
14. Rodrigues · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2019 · 7 · 585710.1039/C9TA00074G ↗
15. Shi · Chem. Rev. · 2021 · 121 · 64910.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00454 ↗
16. Zhang · Chem. Sci. · 2019 · 10 · 513310.1039/C9SC00496C ↗
17. Sato · Sci. Rep. · 2016 · 6 · 2826510.1038/srep28265 ↗
18. Kim · Adv. Sci. · 2022 · 9 · 210405410.1002/advs.202104054 ↗
19. Gao · ACS Nano · 2020 · 14 · 79110.1021/acsnano.9b07781 ↗
20. Pattadar · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2020 · 142 · 1926810.1021/jacs.0c09426 ↗
21. Li · Matter · 2020 · 2 · 55410.1016/j.matt.2019.12.024 ↗
22. Hong · ACS Nano · 2020 · 14 · 1120510.1021/acsnano.0c02891 ↗
23. Kang · Nanoscale · 2022 · 14 · 140910.1039/D1NR06634J ↗
24. Kang · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2021 · 13 · 4412410.1021/acsami.1c14201 ↗
25. Choi · Chem. Eng. J. · 2021 · 417 · 12802610.1016/j.cej.2020.128026 ↗
26. Wang · Chem. Sci. · 2020 · 11 · 535910.1039/D0SC01284J ↗
27. Soares · Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A · 2019 · 475 · 20180677
28. Kang · ACS Nano · 2020 · 14 · 438310.1021/acsnano.9b09974 ↗
29. A. J.Bard , R.Parsons and J.Jordan , Standard Potentials in Aqueous Solution , 1985
30. Kobayashi · Acc. Chem. Res. · 2015 · 48 · 155110.1021/ar500413e ↗
31. Kusada · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2014 · 136 · 186410.1021/ja409464g ↗
32. Zhou · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2020 · 13 · 318510.1039/D0EE01856B ↗
33. Sumi · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2020 · 45 · 246010.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.11.167 ↗
34. Hong · Appl. Catal., B · 2021 · 294 · 12023010.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120230 ↗
35. Wang · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2021 · 9 · 2293410.1039/D1TA06995K ↗
36. Yuan · ACS Appl. Energy Mater. · 2021 · 4 · 1221110.1021/acsaem.1c01947 ↗
37. Muthurasu · Appl. Catal., B · 2019 · 248 · 20210.1016/j.apcatb.2019.02.014 ↗
38. Zhang · Sci. Rep. · 2013 · 3 · 0152610.1038/srep01526 ↗
39. Xu · Chem. Sci. · 2017 · 8 · 841110.1039/C7SC04109H ↗
40. Choi · Chem. Commun. · 2019 · 55 · 1101310.1039/C9CC06031F ↗
41. Lim · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2020 · 46 · 18510.1016/j.jmst.2020.01.036 ↗
42. Hu · Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. · 2022 · 3 · 10087310.1016/j.xcrp.2022.100873 ↗
43. Jin · Chem · 2020 · 6 · 238210.1016/j.chempr.2020.06.037 ↗
44. Jin · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2022 · 61 · e20220385010.1002/anie.202203850 ↗
45. Liu · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2021 · 9 · 502610.1039/D0TA09501J ↗
46. Wang · Nat. Commun. · 2019 · 10 · 569210.1038/s41467-019-13519-1 ↗
47. Ding · Nano Energy · 2018 · 47 · 110.1016/j.nanoen.2018.02.017 ↗
48. Lu · Nat. Chem. · 2018 · 10 · 45610.1038/s41557-018-0012-0 ↗
49. Pu · Angew. Chem. · 2017 · 129 · 1171710.1002/ange.201704911 ↗
50. Qin · ACS Catal. · 2019 · 9 · 961410.1021/acscatal.9b01744 ↗
51. Chi · ChemSusChem · 2018 · 11 · 74310.1002/cssc.201702010 ↗
52. Zheng · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2016 · 138 · 1617410.1021/jacs.6b11291 ↗
53. Yang · Chem. Commun. · 2019 · 55 · 149010.1039/C8CC09993F ↗
54. Edison · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2019 · 4 · 232310.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.02.018 ↗