Sequential galvanic replacement mediated Pd-doped hollow Ru–Te nanorods for enhanced hydrogen evolution reaction mass activity in alkaline media
Source abstract
Abstract
High catalytic activity, long-term stability, and economical Pt-free catalysts for the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) are required for the conversion of renewable energy systems. Noble nanomaterial Pt is a superior electrolysis catalyst for water splitting under typical experimental conditions with a relatively low overpotential. However, the use of Pt is limited by its high cost and activity degradation over time. Among several prospective alternatives, Ru has emerged as a promising alkaline electrolysis catalyst because of its significant catalytic activity and reduced cost compared to Pt. We designed and suggested Pd-doped hollow Ru-Te nanorods (PdRuTeNRs) via successive galvanic replacement reactions of sacrificial Te nanotemplates to further boost efficiency. The Pd/partially oxidized RuO2/Ru/Te hetero-interfaced composition exhibited an HER mass activity of 11.3 A g-1 Ru, twice that of Pt. In addition, the present PdRuTeNRs sufficiently maintained the activity from the 2000-cycle continuous test, greatly reducing the required cost by a quarter.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Advanced battery technologies research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry, Kwangwoon University, 20 Gwangwoon-ro, Nowon-gu, Seoul 01897, Republic of Korea
Department of Chemical Engineering, Konkuk University, 120 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea
Funding
Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning
References (54)
Show source-provided references
1. Navarro-Pardo · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2020 · 30 · 190846710.1002/adfm.201908467 ↗
2. Zhou · ChemSusChem · 2020 · 13 · 564710.1002/cssc.202001230 ↗
3. Cho · Energy Convers. Manage. · 2022 · 252 · 11503810.1016/j.enconman.2021.115038 ↗
4. Ha · Nanoscale · 2022 · 14 · 933110.1039/D2NR01800D ↗
5. Li · Nanoscale · 2022 · 14 · 625810.1039/D2NR00822J ↗
6. Yuan · Nanoscale · 2022 · 14 · 249010.1039/D1NR05941F ↗
7. Luo · Mater. Today Phys. · 2020 · 15 · 10027410.1016/j.mtphys.2020.100274 ↗
8. Li · ACS Omega · 2020 · 5 · 3110.1021/acsomega.9b03550 ↗
9. Bae · Nanoscale Horiz. · 2020 · 5 · 4310.1039/C9NH00485H ↗
10. Zhang · J. Power Sources · 2020 · 471 · 22844610.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228446 ↗
11. Panfil · Angew. Chem. · 2018 · 130 · 435410.1002/ange.201708510 ↗
12. Astruc · Chem. Rev. · 2020 · 120 · 46110.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00696 ↗
13. Lee · Nat. Commun. · 2021 · 12 · 427110.1038/s41467-021-24578-8 ↗
14. Rodrigues · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2019 · 7 · 585710.1039/C9TA00074G ↗
15. Shi · Chem. Rev. · 2021 · 121 · 64910.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00454 ↗
16. Zhang · Chem. Sci. · 2019 · 10 · 513310.1039/C9SC00496C ↗
17. Sato · Sci. Rep. · 2016 · 6 · 2826510.1038/srep28265 ↗
18. Kim · Adv. Sci. · 2022 · 9 · 210405410.1002/advs.202104054 ↗
19. Gao · ACS Nano · 2020 · 14 · 79110.1021/acsnano.9b07781 ↗
20. Pattadar · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2020 · 142 · 1926810.1021/jacs.0c09426 ↗
21. Li · Matter · 2020 · 2 · 55410.1016/j.matt.2019.12.024 ↗
22. Hong · ACS Nano · 2020 · 14 · 1120510.1021/acsnano.0c02891 ↗
23. Kang · Nanoscale · 2022 · 14 · 140910.1039/D1NR06634J ↗
24. Kang · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2021 · 13 · 4412410.1021/acsami.1c14201 ↗
25. Choi · Chem. Eng. J. · 2021 · 417 · 12802610.1016/j.cej.2020.128026 ↗
26. Wang · Chem. Sci. · 2020 · 11 · 535910.1039/D0SC01284J ↗
27. Soares · Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A · 2019 · 475 · 20180677
28. Kang · ACS Nano · 2020 · 14 · 438310.1021/acsnano.9b09974 ↗
29. A. J.Bard , R.Parsons and J.Jordan , Standard Potentials in Aqueous Solution , 1985
30. Kobayashi · Acc. Chem. Res. · 2015 · 48 · 155110.1021/ar500413e ↗
31. Kusada · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2014 · 136 · 186410.1021/ja409464g ↗
32. Zhou · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2020 · 13 · 318510.1039/D0EE01856B ↗
33. Sumi · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2020 · 45 · 246010.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.11.167 ↗
34. Hong · Appl. Catal., B · 2021 · 294 · 12023010.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120230 ↗
35. Wang · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2021 · 9 · 2293410.1039/D1TA06995K ↗
36. Yuan · ACS Appl. Energy Mater. · 2021 · 4 · 1221110.1021/acsaem.1c01947 ↗
37. Muthurasu · Appl. Catal., B · 2019 · 248 · 20210.1016/j.apcatb.2019.02.014 ↗
38. Zhang · Sci. Rep. · 2013 · 3 · 0152610.1038/srep01526 ↗
39. Xu · Chem. Sci. · 2017 · 8 · 841110.1039/C7SC04109H ↗
40. Choi · Chem. Commun. · 2019 · 55 · 1101310.1039/C9CC06031F ↗
41. Lim · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2020 · 46 · 18510.1016/j.jmst.2020.01.036 ↗
42. Hu · Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. · 2022 · 3 · 10087310.1016/j.xcrp.2022.100873 ↗
43. Jin · Chem · 2020 · 6 · 238210.1016/j.chempr.2020.06.037 ↗
44. Jin · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2022 · 61 · e20220385010.1002/anie.202203850 ↗
45. Liu · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2021 · 9 · 502610.1039/D0TA09501J ↗
46. Wang · Nat. Commun. · 2019 · 10 · 569210.1038/s41467-019-13519-1 ↗
47. Ding · Nano Energy · 2018 · 47 · 110.1016/j.nanoen.2018.02.017 ↗
48. Lu · Nat. Chem. · 2018 · 10 · 45610.1038/s41557-018-0012-0 ↗
49. Pu · Angew. Chem. · 2017 · 129 · 1171710.1002/ange.201704911 ↗
50. Qin · ACS Catal. · 2019 · 9 · 961410.1021/acscatal.9b01744 ↗
51. Chi · ChemSusChem · 2018 · 11 · 74310.1002/cssc.201702010 ↗
52. Zheng · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2016 · 138 · 1617410.1021/jacs.6b11291 ↗
53. Yang · Chem. Commun. · 2019 · 55 · 149010.1039/C8CC09993F ↗
54. Edison · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2019 · 4 · 232310.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.02.018 ↗