journal article·2021

Rapid monitoring of graphene exfoliation using NMR proton relaxation

Sofia Marchesini, Piers Turner, Keith R. Paton, Benjamen P. Reed, Andrew J. Pollard

Nanoscale· Volume 13· Issue 34
Publisher page

Abstract

Graphene is now being produced on an industrial scale and there is a pressing need for rapid in-line measurements of particle size for Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC). Standardised characterisation techniques such as electron microscopy and scanning probe microscopy can be time consuming and may require pre-processing steps and/or solvent elimination prior to measurements. Herein, we demonstrate the use of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) proton relaxation as a powerful method for monitoring the sonication assisted liquid phase exfoliation of graphene. This technique requires little or no sample preparation and the resulting spin-spin relaxation time showed a strong correlation with particle size, exfoliation yield and specific surface area measurements. As the NMR proton relaxation method is rapid, inexpensive, and can potentially be operated in-line, it shows great promise to become a valuable QA/QC method for graphene production methods in liquid.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Ion-surface interactions and analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

National Physical Laboratory, Hampton Road, Teddington, TW11 0LW, UK

Funding

Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, UK Government

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Novoselov · Nature · 2012 · 490 · 19210.1038/nature11458 ↗
2. Hernandez · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2008 · 3 · 56310.1038/nnano.2008.215 ↗
3. Xu · Nanomaterials · 2018 · 8 · 94210.3390/nano8110942 ↗
4. Su · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 233210.1021/nn200025p ↗
5. Telkhozhayeva · Langmuir · 2021 · 11 · 5610.1021/acs.langmuir.0c03668 ↗
6. Sandhya · Ultrason. Sonochem. · 2021 · 73 · 10547910.1016/j.ultsonch.2021.105479 ↗
7. Turner · Sci. Rep. · 2019 · 9 · 110.1038/s41598-019-45059-5 ↗
8. Lin · Nat. Mater. · 2019 · 18 · 52010.1038/s41563-019-0341-4 ↗
9. Dóra · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2009 · 102 · 19760210.1103/PhysRevLett.102.197602 ↗
10. Fairhurst · Magn. Reson. Chem. · 2015 · 54 · 52110.1002/mrc.4218 ↗
11. Davis · Powder Technol. · 1987 · 53 · 3910.1016/0032-5910(87)80123-7 ↗
12. Elliott · Powder Technol. · 2018 · 333 · 45810.1016/j.powtec.2018.04.050 ↗
13. Ohba · Carbon · 2013 · 61 · 4010.1016/J.CARBON.2013.04.061 ↗
14. Paruthi · NanoImpact · 2019 · 14 · 10014810.1016/j.impact.2019.100148 ↗
15. Paruthi · J. Nanopart. Res. · 2017 · 19 · 29210.1007/s11051-017-3962-z ↗
16. Nelson · Langmuir · 2002 · 18 · 275010.1021/la0156863 ↗
17. Zhang · Environ. Sci. Nano · 2017 · 4 · 57710.1039/c6en00528d ↗
18. Marchesini · Nanoscale · 2021 · 13 · 638910.1039/D0NR08937K ↗
19. Wang · Metrologia · 2015 · 52 · 57510.1088/0026-1394/52/4/575 ↗
20. Paton · Carbon · 2016 · 107 · 73310.1016/j.carbon.2016.06.043 ↗
21. Backes · Nanoscale · 2016 · 8 · 431110.1039/c5nr08047a ↗
22. Meiboom · Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 1958 · 29 · 68810.1063/1.1716296 ↗
23. Ismail · Langmuir · 1992 · 8 · 36010.1021/la00038a006. ↗
24. Seah · J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. · 1995 · 71 · 19110.1016/0368-2048(94)02275-5 ↗
25. Seah · J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. · 2001 · 120 · 9310.1016/S0368-2048(01)00311-5 ↗
26. Hodnett · Ultrason. Sonochem. · 2007 · 14 · 2910.1016/j.ultsonch.2006.01.003 ↗
27. Kouroupis-Agalou · Nanoscale · 2014 · 6 · 592610.1039/c3nr06919b ↗
28. Pollard · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 105 · 25310710.1063/1.4905128 ↗
29. Tuinstra · J. Chem. Phys. · 1970 · 53 · 112610.1063/1.1674108 ↗
30. Marchesini · Carbon · 2020 · 167 · 58510.1016/j.carbon.2020.05.083 ↗
31. Ahmad · Curr. Appl. Phys. · 2012 · 12 · 96910.1016/j.cap.2011.12.020 ↗
32. Tampieri · J. Mater. Chem. C · 2014 · 2 · 810510.1039/c4tc01383b ↗