Rapid monitoring of graphene exfoliation using NMR proton relaxation
Source abstract
Abstract
Graphene is now being produced on an industrial scale and there is a pressing need for rapid in-line measurements of particle size for Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC). Standardised characterisation techniques such as electron microscopy and scanning probe microscopy can be time consuming and may require pre-processing steps and/or solvent elimination prior to measurements. Herein, we demonstrate the use of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) proton relaxation as a powerful method for monitoring the sonication assisted liquid phase exfoliation of graphene. This technique requires little or no sample preparation and the resulting spin-spin relaxation time showed a strong correlation with particle size, exfoliation yield and specific surface area measurements. As the NMR proton relaxation method is rapid, inexpensive, and can potentially be operated in-line, it shows great promise to become a valuable QA/QC method for graphene production methods in liquid.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Ion-surface interactions and analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
National Physical Laboratory, Hampton Road, Teddington, TW11 0LW, UK
Funding
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, UK Government
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Novoselov · Nature · 2012 · 490 · 19210.1038/nature11458 ↗
2. Hernandez · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2008 · 3 · 56310.1038/nnano.2008.215 ↗
3. Xu · Nanomaterials · 2018 · 8 · 94210.3390/nano8110942 ↗
4. Su · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 233210.1021/nn200025p ↗
5. Telkhozhayeva · Langmuir · 2021 · 11 · 5610.1021/acs.langmuir.0c03668 ↗
6. Sandhya · Ultrason. Sonochem. · 2021 · 73 · 10547910.1016/j.ultsonch.2021.105479 ↗
7. Turner · Sci. Rep. · 2019 · 9 · 110.1038/s41598-019-45059-5 ↗
8. Lin · Nat. Mater. · 2019 · 18 · 52010.1038/s41563-019-0341-4 ↗
9. Dóra · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2009 · 102 · 19760210.1103/PhysRevLett.102.197602 ↗
10. Fairhurst · Magn. Reson. Chem. · 2015 · 54 · 52110.1002/mrc.4218 ↗
11. Davis · Powder Technol. · 1987 · 53 · 3910.1016/0032-5910(87)80123-7 ↗
12. Elliott · Powder Technol. · 2018 · 333 · 45810.1016/j.powtec.2018.04.050 ↗
13. Ohba · Carbon · 2013 · 61 · 4010.1016/J.CARBON.2013.04.061 ↗
14. Paruthi · NanoImpact · 2019 · 14 · 10014810.1016/j.impact.2019.100148 ↗
15. Paruthi · J. Nanopart. Res. · 2017 · 19 · 29210.1007/s11051-017-3962-z ↗
16. Nelson · Langmuir · 2002 · 18 · 275010.1021/la0156863 ↗
17. Zhang · Environ. Sci. Nano · 2017 · 4 · 57710.1039/c6en00528d ↗
18. Marchesini · Nanoscale · 2021 · 13 · 638910.1039/D0NR08937K ↗
19. Wang · Metrologia · 2015 · 52 · 57510.1088/0026-1394/52/4/575 ↗
20. Paton · Carbon · 2016 · 107 · 73310.1016/j.carbon.2016.06.043 ↗
21. Backes · Nanoscale · 2016 · 8 · 431110.1039/c5nr08047a ↗
22. Meiboom · Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 1958 · 29 · 68810.1063/1.1716296 ↗
23. Ismail · Langmuir · 1992 · 8 · 36010.1021/la00038a006. ↗
24. Seah · J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. · 1995 · 71 · 19110.1016/0368-2048(94)02275-5 ↗
25. Seah · J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. · 2001 · 120 · 9310.1016/S0368-2048(01)00311-5 ↗
26. Hodnett · Ultrason. Sonochem. · 2007 · 14 · 2910.1016/j.ultsonch.2006.01.003 ↗
27. Kouroupis-Agalou · Nanoscale · 2014 · 6 · 592610.1039/c3nr06919b ↗
28. Pollard · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 105 · 25310710.1063/1.4905128 ↗
29. Tuinstra · J. Chem. Phys. · 1970 · 53 · 112610.1063/1.1674108 ↗
30. Marchesini · Carbon · 2020 · 167 · 58510.1016/j.carbon.2020.05.083 ↗
31. Ahmad · Curr. Appl. Phys. · 2012 · 12 · 96910.1016/j.cap.2011.12.020 ↗
32. Tampieri · J. Mater. Chem. C · 2014 · 2 · 810510.1039/c4tc01383b ↗