Ultrafast transient optical loss dynamics in exciton–plasmon nano-assemblies
Source abstract
Abstract
We study the exciton-plasmon dynamics that lead to optical loss mitigation via ultrafast transient absorption spectroscopy (UTAS) on hybrid aggregates of core-shell quantum dots (QDs) and Au nanoparticles (NPs). We highlight that generating hot electrons in plasmonic NPs contributes to the transient differential absorption spectrum under optical excitation. The results suggest modifying the method of analyzing the transient absorption spectra of loss mitigated systems. Additionally, we investigate the effect of Electron Oscillation frequency-Phonon Resonance Detuning (EOPRD) on loss mitigation efficiency. Moreover, power dependent UTAS reveal a frequency pulling like effect in the transient bleach maximum towards the gain emission. We show that the appropriate choice of the pump wavelength and by changing the pump power we can conclusively prove the existence of loss mitigation using UTAS. Finally, we study the transient kinetics of hybrid gain-plasmon systems and report interesting hybrid transient kinetics.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications · Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research · Nonlinear Optical Materials Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Atwater · Sci. Am. · 2007 · 296 · 5610.1038/scientificamerican0407-56 ↗
2. Pendry · Sci. Am. · 2006 · 295 · 6010.1038/scientificamerican0706-60 ↗
3. Ozbay · Science · 2006 · 311 · 18910.1126/science.1114849 ↗
4. Schlücker · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2014 · 53 · 475610.1002/anie.201205748 ↗
5. Huang · J. Adv. Res. · 2010 · 1 · 1310.1016/j.jare.2010.02.002 ↗
6. Hedayati · J. Materials · 2014 · 7 · 1996
7. Watts · Adv. Mater. · 2012 · 24 · 98
8. Khurgin · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2015 · 10 · 210.1038/nnano.2014.310 ↗
9. Kreibig · Phys. · 1969 · 224 · 30710.1007/BF01393059 ↗
10. El Kabbash · J. Nanomater. · 2016 · 2016 · 110.1155/2016/4819040 ↗
11. Lawandy · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2004 · 85 · 504010.1063/1.1825058 ↗
12. Strangi · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 98 · 25191210.1063/1.3599566 ↗
13. De Luca · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 582310.1021/nn2015562 ↗
14. Infusino · ACS Photonics · 2014 · 1 · 37110.1021/ph400174p ↗
15. Xiao · Nature · 2010 · 466 · 73510.1038/nature09278 ↗
16. Hess · Nat. Mater. · 2012 · 11 · 57310.1038/nmat3356 ↗
17. Meinzer · Opt. Express · 2010 · 18 · 2414010.1364/OE.18.024140 ↗
18. Suh · Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 576910.1021/nl303086r ↗
19. Hamm · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2011 · 107 · 16740510.1103/PhysRevLett.107.167405 ↗
20. Quinten · Surf. Sci. · 1986 · 172 · 55710.1016/0039-6028(86)90501-7 ↗
21. Burda · J. Phys. Chem. B · 1999 · 103 · 1077510.1021/jp991503y ↗
22. Hunsche · Appl. Phys. B · 1996 · 62 · 310.1007/BF01081240 ↗
23. Wang · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2015 · 119 · 7416
24. Link · J. Phys. Chem. B · 1999 · 103 · 841010.1021/jp9917648 ↗
25. Ahmadi · J. Phys. Chem. B · 1999 · 100 · 8059
26. Ryutov · Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion · 1999 · 41 · A110.1088/0741-3335/41/3A/001 ↗
27. Jain · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2006 · 110 · 13610.1021/jp055562p ↗
28. Grant · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2003 · 125 · 54910.1021/ja028532y ↗
29. Feldstein · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1997 · 119 · 663810.1021/ja964098m ↗
30. Smith · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 1997 · 270 · 13910.1016/S0009-2614(97)00339-4 ↗
31. Link · Int. Rev. Phys. Chem. · 2000 · 19 · 40910.1080/01442350050034180 ↗
32. Dhama · Opt. Express · 2016 · 24 · 1463210.1364/OE.24.014632 ↗
33. Schoenlein · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1987 · 58 · 168010.1103/PhysRevLett.58.1680 ↗
34. Oulton · Nat. Photonics · 2012 · 6 · 21910.1038/nphoton.2012.72 ↗
35. Rashed · RSC Adv. · 2015 · 5 · 5324510.1039/C5RA09673A ↗
36. Lilley · Opt. Mater. Express · 2015 · 5 · 211210.1364/OME.5.002112 ↗
37. De Luca · Nanoscale · 2013 · 5 · 609710.1039/c3nr00988b ↗