journal article·2021

Adoptive CD8 + T-cell grafted with liposomal immunotherapy drugs to counteract the immune suppressive tumor microenvironment and enhance therapy for melanoma

Simeng Liu, Huimin Liu, Xiaoshuang Song, Ailing Jiang, Yuchuan Deng, Chengli Yang, Dan Sun, Kun Jiang, Fan Yang, Yu Zheng

Nanoscale· Volume 13· Issue 37
Publisher page

Abstract

The immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment has become a formidable obstacle to the treatment of tumors using adoptive T cell therapy, in particular solid tumors. For the purposes of addressing this issue, effector OT-1 CD8+T cells conjugated with liposomal immune regulators (CD8-T-LP-CpG/CD8-T-LP-BMS-202) were developed. An anionic liposome formulation was employed to avoid T cell aggregation and prevent unfavorable side-effects. The inclusion of EGCG in the LP-CpG formulation facilitated the formation of compact complexes with poly lysine (PLL) and is thus expected to increase the stability. CD8-T-LP-CpG administered with a median dose of CpG (20 μg per mouse) markedly reduced the frequency of tumor infiltrating polymorphonuclear leukocyte myeloid-derived suppressor cells (PMN-MDSCs) (20-folds), M2-like macrophages (8-folds), regulatory T-cells (Treg) (2.7-folds), and consequently increased the frequency of cytotoxic CD8+T cells in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) (2-folds) and splenic effector memory CD8+T cells (3-folds) relative to the phosphate buffered saline (PBS) control group. Furthermore, the absolute number of tumor infiltrating lymphocyte subtypes altered followed a consistent trend. The difference remained significant compared to the OT-1 CD8+T cells and the drug-loaded liposome combination group. According to in vivo imaging of CD8-T-LP-DiD, we assumed that the improvement in regulation of the tumor microenvironment of LP-CpG/LP-BMS-202 was attributed to the enhanced drug transportation to the tumor site aided by tumor-specific OT-1 CD8+T cells. In addition, CD8-T-LP-BMS-202 administered with a low dose of BMS-202 (1.5 mg per kg body weight) exerted a dramatically improved therapeutic effect by reducing the tumor infiltrating PMN-MDSCs and M2-like macrophages and the corresponding promoted cytotoxic CD8+T cell recruitment in the TILs and effector memory CD8+T cells mediated anti-tumor immunity. In summary, immune therapy drugs backpacked onto adoptive T cell therapy provides a feasible strategy to improve the therapeutic effect and could result in future clinical translation.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Immunotherapy and Immune Responses · CAR-T cell therapy research · Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy/Collaborative Innovation Centre of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 17#, Section 3, Ren Min Nan Road, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, PR China

Department of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Development and Related Diseases of Women and Children Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Ministry of Education, West China Second Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, P.R. China

Funding

Sichuan Province Science and Technology Support Program

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. Hinrichs · Immunol. Rev. · 2014 · 257 · 5610.1111/imr.12132 ↗
2. Sanmamed · Cell · 2018 · 175 · 31310.1016/j.cell.2018.09.035 ↗
3. Smith · J. Clin. Invest. · 2017 · 127 · 217610.1172/JCI87624 ↗
4. Rafiq · Nat. Rev. Clin Oncol. · 2020 · 17 · 14710.1038/s41571-019-0297-y ↗
5. Krieg · Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery · 2006 · 5 · 47110.1038/nrd2059 ↗
6. Hanagata · Int. J. Nanomed. · 2017 · 12 · 51510.2147/IJN.S114477 ↗
7. Zoglmeier · Clin. Cancer Res. · 2011 · 17 · 176510.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2672 ↗
8. Kheirolomoom · J. Controlled Release · 2015 · 220 · 25310.1016/j.jconrel.2015.10.016 ↗
9. Lechner · Clin. Cancer Res. · 2011 · 17 · 164510.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0024 ↗
10. Stephan · Nat. Med. · 2010 · 16 · 103510.1038/nm.2198 ↗
11. Tang · Nat. Biotechnol. · 2018 · 36 · 70710.1038/nbt.4181 ↗
12. Dunn · Biomaterials · 2019 · 217 · 11926510.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119265 ↗
13. Irvine · Nat. Rev. Immunol. · 2020 · 20 · 32110.1038/s41577-019-0269-6 ↗
14. Stephan · Biomaterials · 2012 · 33 · 577610.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.04.029 ↗
15. Siegler · Mol. Ther. · 2017 · 25 · 260710.1016/j.ymthe.2017.08.010 ↗
16. Huang · Sci. Transl. Med. · 2015 · 7 · 291ra294
17. Wayteck · Biomaterials · 2016 · 77 · 24310.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.11.016 ↗
18. Zhang · Small · 2019 · 15 · e190388110.1002/smll.201903881 ↗
19. Shang · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2020 · 12 · 4008510.1021/acsami.0c11156 ↗
20. van der Kooij · BMJ Open · 2020 · 10 · e04403610.1136/bmjopen-2020-044036 ↗
21. Wilson · Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. · 2009 · 61 · 23310.1016/j.addr.2008.12.014 ↗
22. Malyala · Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. · 2009 · 61 · 21810.1016/j.addr.2008.12.009 ↗
23. Lai · Theranostics · 2018 · 8 · 172310.7150/thno.22056 ↗
24. Shen · ACS Cent. Sci. · 2018 · 4 · 132610.1021/acscentsci.8b00363 ↗
25. Latz · Nat. Immunol. · 2004 · 5 · 19010.1038/ni1028 ↗
26. Maimela · Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. · 2019 · 17 · 110.1016/j.csbj.2018.11.004 ↗
27. Yang · J. Hematol. Oncol. · 2019 · 12 · 12510.1186/s13045-019-0804-8 ↗
28. Saleh · Semin. Cancer Biol. · 2020 · 65 · 1310.1016/j.semcancer.2019.07.017 ↗
29. Vitale · Cell Metab. · 2019 · 30 · 3610.1016/j.cmet.2019.06.001 ↗
30. Tanaka · Cell Res. · 2017 · 27 · 10910.1038/cr.2016.151 ↗
31. St Paul · Trends Cell Biol. · 2020 · 30 · 69510.1016/j.tcb.2020.06.003 ↗
32. Jameson · Immunity · 2018 · 48 · 21410.1016/j.immuni.2018.02.010 ↗
33. Kumar · Immunity · 2018 · 48 · 20210.1016/j.immuni.2018.01.007 ↗
34. Zak · Oncotarget · 2016 · 7 · 3032310.18632/oncotarget.8730 ↗
35. Kalos · Immunity · 2013 · 39 · 4910.1016/j.immuni.2013.07.002 ↗
36. Rosenberg · Science · 2015 · 348 · 6210.1126/science.aaa4967 ↗
37. Duraiswamy · Cancer Res. · 2013 · 73 · 690010.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-1550 ↗
38. Prescher · Nature · 2004 · 430 · 87310.1038/nature02791 ↗
39. Wang · Nat. Chem. Biol. · 2017 · 13 · 41510.1038/nchembio.2297 ↗
40. Conniot · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2019 · 14 · 89110.1038/s41565-019-0512-0 ↗
41. Gobert · Cancer Res. · 2009 · 69 · 200010.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-2360 ↗
42. Khazaie · Semin. Cancer Biol. · 2006 · 16 · 12410.1016/j.semcancer.2005.11.006 ↗
43. Chung · Int. J. Cancer · 2012 · 131 · E22710.1002/ijc.27403 ↗
44. Shan · Nanoscale · 2020 · 12 · 2226810.1039/D0NR04520A ↗
45. Han · Theranostics · 2021 · 11 · 289210.7150/thno.50928 ↗
46. Liu · Mol. Immunol. · 2021 · 132 · 19910.1016/j.molimm.2021.01.003 ↗
47. Molino · Biomaterials · 2016 · 86 · 8310.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.056 ↗
48. Dong · Biomaterials · 2019 · 209 · 11110.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.04.024 ↗
49. Dong · Biomaterials · 2020 · 230 · 11965910.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119659 ↗