Highly pseudocapacitive metal–organic framework derived carbon skeleton supported Fe–Ti–O nanotablets as an anode material for efficient lithium storage
Source abstract
Abstract
A facile and effective method to fabricate highly pseudocapacitive electrodes of Fe-Ti-O@C has been proposed here. In this strategy, FeOOH crystals were firstly grown uniformly on the surface of Ti-based MOF (MIL-125) tablet substrates through a solution immersion method, and then converted to uniform carbon supported Fe-Ti-O composites by calcination under argon. The obtained Fe-Ti-O@C composites were first utilized as an efficient anode for lithium ion batteries with a high reversible capacity of 988 mA h g-1 after 160 cycles at 200 mA g-1. Such a superior lithium storage performance may be due to the synergistic effect of the Fe3O4 nanoparticles with a high capacity, FeTiO3 nanocomposites with a nearly stable structure during the Li+ insertion/removal process, and the conductive carbon skeleton with a large surface area and porous structure. This work represents an important step forward in the fabrication of MOF-derived hybrids and enables transition metal oxides (TMOs) to have potential applications in energy storage systems.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Beijing Key Laboratory for Green Catalysis and Separation
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
School of Environmental and Energy Engineering
Center of Excellence for Environmental Safety and Biological Effects
Beijing University of Technology
Funding
Beijing Municipal Commission of Education · Beijing University of Technology
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. Tarascon · Nature · 2001 · 414 · 35910.1038/35104644 ↗
2. Zhou · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2014 · 7 · 130710.1039/C3EE43182G ↗
3. Etacheri · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2011 · 4 · 324310.1039/c1ee01598b ↗
4. Zhang · Adv. Mater. · 2017 · 29 · 160470810.1002/adma.201604708 ↗
5. Zhang · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2016 · 26 · 44010.1002/adfm.201503777 ↗
6. Zhang · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2008 · 18 · 394110.1002/adfm.200801386 ↗
7. Wang · J. Electroanal. Chem. · 2017 · 807 · 19610.1016/j.jelechem.2017.10.039 ↗
8. Wang · Chem. Eng. J. · 2016 · 306 · 119310.1016/j.cej.2016.08.057 ↗
9. Xia · Electrochim. Acta · 2016 · 187 · 5510.1016/j.electacta.2015.11.047 ↗
10. Foley · ChemElectroChem · 2018 · 5 · 376410.1002/celc.201800989 ↗
11. Fan · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2017 · 9 · 1070810.1021/acsami.7b00578 ↗
12. Guo · Electrochim. Acta · 2019 · 322 · 13476310.1016/j.electacta.2019.134763 ↗
13. Wang · Sci. Rep. · 2012 · 2 · 70110.1038/srep00701 ↗
14. Sun · Electrochim. Acta · 2018 · 288 · 7110.1016/j.electacta.2018.08.060 ↗
15. Lubke · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2015 · 3 · 2290810.1039/C5TA07554H ↗
16. Ding · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2018 · 10 · 1347010.1021/acsami.8b00353 ↗
17. Li · Appl. Phys. A · 2018 · 124 · 33210.1007/s00339-018-1750-y ↗
18. Tao · Electrochim. Acta · 2013 · 108 · 12710.1016/j.electacta.2013.06.103 ↗
19. Zhao · Joule · 2018 · 2 · 223510.1016/j.joule.2018.09.019 ↗
20. Zhou · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2014 · 43 · 541510.1039/C4CS90059F ↗
21. Yang · Adv. Mater. · 2019 · 31 · 180474010.1002/adma.201804740 ↗
22. Yu · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2016 · 55 · 1342210.1002/anie.201606776 ↗
23. Aslam · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2018 · 6 · 1408310.1039/C8TA04676J ↗
24. Fu · Angew. Chem. · 2012 · 124 · 342010.1002/ange.201108357 ↗
25. Lin · Nanoscale · 2019 · 11 · 377310.1039/C8NR10444A ↗
26. Pan · Chem. Mater. · 2009 · 21 · 313610.1021/cm900395k ↗
27. Wang · Chem. Eng. J. · 2019 · 356 · 74610.1016/j.cej.2018.09.015 ↗
28. Zhou · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2018 · 439 · 92710.1016/j.apsusc.2017.12.259 ↗
29. Shi · Chem. Eng. J. · 2017 · 330 · 45310.1016/j.cej.2017.07.164 ↗
30. Sinhamahapatra · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2015 · 8 · 353910.1039/C5EE02443A ↗
31. Yang · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2013 · 135 · 739410.1021/ja311550t ↗
32. Yu · ACS Nano · 2017 · 11 · 512010.1021/acsnano.7b02136 ↗
33. Luo · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2018 · 6 · 146210.1039/C7TA09757C ↗
34. Yu · Small · 2016 · 12 · 214610.1002/smll.201502299 ↗
35. Irvine · Adv. Mater. · 1990 · 2 · 13210.1002/adma.19900020304 ↗
36. Zhang · Chem. – Eur. J. · 2018 · 24 · 1733910.1002/chem.201804221 ↗
37. Zhao · ChemPlusChem · 2012 · 77 · 74810.1002/cplu.201200134 ↗
38. David · ACS Nano · 2014 · 8 · 175910.1021/nn406156b ↗
39. Liu · Nanotechnology · 2017 · 28 · 15560310.1088/1361-6528/aa6143 ↗
40. Kalluri · Sci. Rep. · 2015 · 5 · 1198910.1038/srep11989 ↗
41. Zhao · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2017 · 9 · 375710.1021/acsami.6b15110 ↗
42. Li · RSC Adv. · 2016 · 6 · 6526610.1039/C6RA10682J ↗
43. Mao · ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. · 2019 · 7 · 342410.1021/acssuschemeng.8b05651 ↗
44. Liao · Chem. Eng. J. · 2019 · 355 · 80510.1016/j.cej.2018.08.141 ↗
45. Shi · Small · 2018 · 14 · 180271610.1002/smll.201802716 ↗
46. Tang · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2019 · 7 · 446910.1039/C8TA10614B ↗