MoS 2 -modified porous gas diffusion layer with air–solid–liquid interface for efficient electrocatalytic water splitting
Source abstract
Abstract
The formation and adsorption of bubbles on electrodes weaken the efficiency of gas evolution reactions such as the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and oxygen evolution reaction (OER) by hindering proton transfer and consuming nucleation energy. Herein, a triphase electrode was fabricated to address this limitation by immobilizing MoS2 nanosheets on a porous gas diffusion layer (GDL). This electrode shows a superior HER and OER ratio, high current density and stable working state in electrocatalytic water splitting. Moreover, by lowering the pressure behind the GDL, we further improved the water-splitting rate (the current density was three times higher than that of a bare MoS2 diphase electrode at -0.37 V for HER and 1.62 V for OER) and stability by eliminating the appearance of bubbles, even under a current density as high as 100 mA cm-2. Our work manifests the significance of constructing a triphase system for water splitting, and the system is also available for other gas evolution reactions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Advanced battery technologies research · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Key Laboratory of Artificial Micro- and Nano-structures of the Ministry of Education and School of Physics and Technology
Wuhan University
Wuhan 430072
P. R. China
The Institute for Advanced Studies (IAS)
Wuhan
Department of Materials Science and Engineering
Southern University of Science and Technology
Shenzhen
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. Greeley · Nat. Mater. · 2006 · 5 · 90910.1038/nmat1752 ↗
2. Li · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2011 · 133 · 729610.1021/ja201269b ↗
3. Jaramillo · Science · 2007 · 317 · 10010.1126/science.1141483 ↗
4. Karunadasa · Science · 2012 · 335 · 68710.1126/science.1215868 ↗
5. Laursen · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2012 · 5 · 557710.1039/c2ee02618j ↗
6. Yu · Nanoscale · 2015 · 7 · 873110.1039/C5NR00670H ↗
7. Yu · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2014 · 2 · 455110.1039/C3TA14744D ↗
8. Kim · Nanoscale · 2017 · 9 · 1904510.1039/C7NR07224D ↗
9. Liu · Nano Energy · 2018 · 44 · 710.1016/j.nanoen.2017.11.063 ↗
10. Voiry · Nat. Rev. Chem. · 2018 · 2 · 010510.1038/s41570-017-0105 ↗
11. Zhao · Nano Energy · 2018 · 45 · 11810.1016/j.nanoen.2017.12.029 ↗
12. Boissonneau · J. Appl. Electrochem. · 2000 · 30 · 76710.1023/A:1004034807331 ↗
13. De Jonge · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 1982 · 7 · 88310.1016/0360-3199(82)90007-6 ↗
14. Hine · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1975 · 122 · 118510.1149/1.2134422 ↗
15. Daisuke Kiuchi · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2006 · 153 · E13810.1149/1.2207008 ↗
16. Mazloomi · Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. · 2012 · 16 · 425710.1016/j.rser.2012.03.052 ↗
17. Vogt · Electrochim. Acta · 2005 · 50 · 207310.1016/j.electacta.2004.09.025 ↗
18. Zeng · Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. · 2010 · 36 · 30710.1016/j.pecs.2009.11.002 ↗
19. Cho · Nat. Rev. Mater. · 2016 · 2 · 1609210.1038/natrevmats.2016.92 ↗
20. Wang · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2010 · 35 · 319810.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.01.128 ↗
21. Li · Electrochim. Acta · 2009 · 54 · 387710.1016/j.electacta.2009.01.087 ↗
22. Li · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2015 · 25 · 173710.1002/adfm.201404250 ↗
23. Lu · Adv. Mater. · 2014 · 26 · 268310.1002/adma.201304759 ↗
24. Creel · Nat. Catal. · 2018 · 1 · 610.1038/s41929-017-0011-3 ↗
25. Sheng · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2017 · 139 · 1240210.1021/jacs.7b07187 ↗
26. Kim · J. Colloid Interface Sci. · 1987 · 115 · 110.1016/0021-9797(87)90002-6 ↗
27. Cindrella · J. Power Sources · 2009 · 194 · 14610.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.04.005 ↗
28. Mansourizadeh · J. Hazard. Mater. · 2009 · 171 · 3810.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.06.026 ↗
29. Lu · Adv. Mater. · 2016 · 28 · 715510.1002/adma.201504652 ↗
30. K. Oldham and J.Myland , Fundamentals of electrochemical science , Academic Press , San Diego , 1st edn, 1993
31. R. B. Bird , W. E.Stewart and E. N.Lightfoot , Transport phenomena , John Wiley &Sons , New York , 2 nd edn, 2007
32. Belmont · J. Appl. Electrochem. · 1994 · 24 · 47510.1007/BF00249845 ↗
33. Yan · Small · 2016 · 12 · 297510.1002/smll.201600332 ↗
34. Ebbesen · Chem. Rev. · 2014 · 114 · 1069710.1021/cr5000865 ↗
35. H. Gould and J.Tobochnik , Statistical and thermal physics: with computer applications , Princeton University Press , 201010.2307/j.ctvcmxp2z ↗
36. Zhang · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2016 · 128 · 681410.1002/ange.201602237 ↗
37. P. Guo and C.Wang , CoMo2S4/MoS2 Heterostructure with High Catalytic Performance for Overall Water Splitting in Alkaline Medium , 2018
38. Zhou · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2015 · 358 · 15210.1016/j.apsusc.2015.07.187 ↗
39. J. T. Stock and M. V.Orna , Electrochemistry, past and present , American Chemical Society , Columbus Ohio , 198910.1021/bk-1989-0390 ↗
40. Wahl · Galvanotechtnik · 2005 · 96 · 1600
41. Kapałka · Electrochem. Commun. · 2008 · 10 · 60710.1016/j.elecom.2008.02.003 ↗
42. Park · Nat. Rev. Mater. · 2016 · 2 · 1608010.1038/natrevmats.2016.80 ↗
43. Brian · Nature · 2001 · 414 · 34510.1038/35104620 ↗
44. Argyropoulos · Electrochim. Acta · 1999 · 44 · 357510.1016/S0013-4686(99)00102-4 ↗
45. Yang · J. Power Sources · 2005 · 139 · 7910.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.05.033 ↗
46. Reier · ACS Catal. · 2012 · 2 · 176510.1021/cs3003098 ↗