Self-standing aptamers by an artificial defect-rich matrix
Source abstract
Abstract
The classical alkanethiol post-passivation can prevent nonspecific binding of nucleotide bases onto supporting substrates and help aptamers transition from a "lying down" to a "standing up" orientation. However, the surface probes display lower binding affinity towards targets than those in bulk solutions due to unsatisfied hybridization spaces on the alkanethiol passivated substrate. To overcome this challenge, an artificial defect-rich matrix possessing an aptamer "self-standing" property created by chemical lift-off lithography (CLL) is demonstrated. This approach provided artificial defects on a hydroxyl-terminated alkanethiol self-assembled monolayer (SAM), which allowed the insertion of thiolated aptamers. The diluted surface molecular environment assisted aptamers not only to "self-stand" on the surface, but also to separate from each other, providing a suitable surface aptamer density and sufficient space for capturing targets. With this approach, the binding affinity of the aptamer towards a target was comparable to solution-type probes, showing higher recognition efficiency than that in conventional methods.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques · Biosensors and Analytical Detection · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry
National Taiwan University
Taipei 10617
Taiwan
Department and Graduate Institute of Forensic Medicine
Taipei 10002
Funding
Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Cho · Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. · 2009 · 2 · 24110.1146/annurev.anchem.1.031207.112851 ↗
2. Liu · Chem. Rev. · 2009 · 109 · 194810.1021/cr030183i ↗
3. Iliuk · Anal. Chem. · 2011 · 83 · 444010.1021/ac201057w ↗
4. Chen · Nanoscale · 2011 · 3 · 54610.1039/C0NR00646G ↗
5. Liu · Nanoscale · 2011 · 3 · 142110.1039/c0nr00887g ↗
6. Herne · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1997 · 119 · 891610.1021/ja9719586 ↗
7. Xu · Anal. Chem. · 1993 · 65 · 210210.1021/ac00063a029 ↗
8. Leff · Langmuir · 1996 · 12 · 472310.1021/la960445u ↗
9. Kimura-Suda · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2003 · 125 · 901410.1021/ja035756n ↗
10. Levicky · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1998 · 120 · 978710.1021/ja981897r ↗
11. Xu · Nanoscale · 2012 · 4 · 378610.1039/c2nr30826f ↗
12. Fang · Nucleic Acids Res. · 1999 · 27 · 194310.1093/nar/27.8.1943 ↗
13. Kick · J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. · 2009 · 172 · 3610.1016/j.elspec.2009.04.002 ↗
14. Aqua · Langmuir · 2003 · 19 · 1057310.1021/la035116y ↗
15. Shuster · Adv. Mater. · 2008 · 20 · 16410.1002/adma.200700082 ↗
16. Murphy · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2009 · 131 · 404210.1021/ja808696p ↗
17. Josephs · Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 525510.1021/nl3024356 ↗
18. Goodman · Science · 2005 · 310 · 166110.1126/science.1120367 ↗
19. Bu · Chem. Commun. · 2011 · 47 · 768910.1039/c1cc11628b ↗
20. Mitchell · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2009 · 48 · 52510.1002/anie.200804264 ↗
21. Lin · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2015 · 54 · 215110.1002/anie.201410720 ↗
22. Pei · Adv. Mater. · 2010 · 22 · 475410.1002/adma.201002767 ↗
23. Josephs · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2012 · 134 · 1002110.1021/ja3010946 ↗
24. Bumm · Science · 1996 · 271 · 170510.1126/science.271.5256.1705 ↗
25. Cygan · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1998 · 120 · 272110.1021/ja973448h ↗
26. Shuster · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2011 · 115 · 2477810.1021/jp207396m ↗
27. Claridge · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2013 · 42 · 272510.1039/C2CS35365B ↗
28. Mullen · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 90 · 06311410.1063/1.2457525 ↗
29. Saavedra · Rep. Prog. Phys. · 2010 · 73 · 03650110.1088/0034-4885/73/3/036501 ↗
30. Vaish · ACS Chem. Neurosci. · 2010 · 1 · 49510.1021/cn1000205 ↗
31. Kasemo · Surf. Sci. · 2002 · 500 · 65610.1016/S0039-6028(01)01809-X ↗
32. Tirrell · Surf. Sci. · 2002 · 500 · 6110.1016/S0039-6028(01)01548-5 ↗
33. Smith · Prog. Surf. Sci. · 2004 · 75 · 110.1016/j.progsurf.2003.12.001 ↗
34. Liao · Science · 2012 · 337 · 151710.1126/science.1221774 ↗
35. Liu · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2006 · 45 · 9010.1002/anie.200502589 ↗
36. Demers · Anal. Chem. · 2000 · 72 · 553510.1021/ac0006627 ↗
37. Andrews · Acc. Chem. Res. · 2016 · 49 · 144910.1021/acs.accounts.6b00034 ↗
38. Cao · ACS Nano · 2015 · 9 · 1143910.1021/acsnano.5b05546 ↗
39. Hermann · Science · 2000 · 287 · 82010.1126/science.287.5454.820 ↗
40. Ligler · Anal. Chem. · 2009 · 81 · 51910.1021/ac8016289 ↗
41. R. R. Chance , A.Prock and R.Silbey , Molecular Fluorescence and Energy Transfer Near Interfaces , in Adv. Chem. Phys , John Wiley & Sons, Inc. , 2007 , pp. 1–65
42. Srinivasan · ACS Nano · 2007 · 1 · 19110.1021/nn7000799 ↗
43. Shuster · Chem. Commun. · 2011 · 47 · 1064110.1039/c1cc13002a ↗
44. Stojanovic · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2001 · 123 · 492810.1021/ja0038171 ↗
45. Neves · Biochemistry · 2010 · 49 · 847810.1021/bi100952k ↗
46. Neves · Biophys. Chem. · 2010 · 153 · 910.1016/j.bpc.2010.09.009 ↗
47. White · Langmuir · 2008 · 24 · 1051310.1021/la800801v ↗
48. Baker · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2006 · 128 · 313810.1021/ja056957p ↗