journal article·2017

Topology of polymer chains under nanoscale confinement

Vahid Satarifard, Maziar Heidari, Samaneh Mashaghi, Sander J. Tans, Mohammad Reza Ejtehadi, Alireza Mashaghi

Nanoscale· Volume 9· Issue 33
Publisher page

Abstract

Spatial confinement limits the conformational space accessible to biomolecules but the implications for bimolecular topology are not yet known. Folded linear biopolymers can be seen as molecular circuits formed by intramolecular contacts. The pairwise arrangement of intra-chain contacts can be categorized as parallel, series or cross, and has been identified as a topological property. Using molecular dynamics simulations, we determine the contact order distributions and topological circuits of short semi-flexible linear and ring polymer chains with a persistence length of lp under a spherical confinement of radius Rc. At low values of lp/Rc, the entropy of the linear chain leads to the formation of independent contacts along the chain and accordingly, increases the fraction of series topology with respect to other topologies. However, at high lp/Rc, the fraction of cross and parallel topologies are enhanced in the chain topological circuits with cross becoming predominant. At an intermediate confining regime, we identify a critical value of lp/Rc, at which all topological states have equal probability. Confinement thus equalizes the probability of more complex cross and parallel topologies to the level of the more simple, non-cooperative series topology. Moreover, our topology analysis reveals distinct behaviours for ring- and linear polymers under weak confinement; however, we find no difference between ring- and linear polymers under strong confinement. Under weak confinement, ring polymers adopt parallel and series topologies with equal likelihood, while linear polymers show a higher tendency for series arrangement. The radial distribution analysis of the topology reveals a non-uniform effect of confinement on the topology of polymer chains, thereby imposing more pronounced effects on the core region than on the confinement surface. Additionally, our results reveal that over a wide range of confining radii, loops arranged in parallel and cross topologies have nearly the same contact orders. Such degeneracy implies that the kinetics and transition rates between the topological states cannot be solely explained by contact order. We expect these findings to be of general importance in understanding chaperone assisted protein folding, chromosome architecture, and the evolution of molecular folds.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research

Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences

Leiden University

Leiden

The Netherlands

School of Engineering and Applied Sciences and Department of Physics

Harvard University

Cambridge

USA

FOM institute AMOLF

Amsterdam

Department of Physics

Sharif University of Technology

Tehran

Iran

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. Smith · Nature · 2001 · 413 · 74810.1038/35099581 ↗
2. Gürsoy · Nucleic Acids Res. · 2014 · 42 · 822310.1093/nar/gku462 ↗
3. Dekker · Nat. Rev. Genet. · 2013 · 14 · 39010.1038/nrg3454 ↗
4. Ellis · Curr. Biol. · 2001 · 11 · R103810.1016/S0960-9822(01)00620-0 ↗
5. Fedyukina · Annu. Rev. Biophys. · 2011 · 40 · 33710.1146/annurev-biophys-042910-155338 ↗
6. Takagi · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2003 · 100 · 1136710.1073/pnas.1831920100 ↗
7. Mashaghi · Chem. Rev. · 2013 · 114 · 66010.1021/cr400326k ↗
8. Homouz · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2008 · 105 · 1175410.1073/pnas.0803672105 ↗
9. Soranno · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2014 · 111 · 487410.1073/pnas.1322611111 ↗
10. Arsuaga · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2002 · 99 · 537310.1073/pnas.032095099 ↗
11. Miller · Sci. Am. · 1998 · 278 · 4610.1038/scientificamerican0198-66 ↗
12. Persson · Nano Lett. · 2009 · 9 · 138210.1021/nl803030e ↗
13. Jun · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2006 · 103 · 1238810.1073/pnas.0605305103 ↗
14. Magerl · ACS Macro Lett. · 2015 · 4 · 136210.1021/acsmacrolett.5b00676 ↗
15. Najafi · J. Chem. Phys. · 2015 · 143 · 24312110.1063/1.4934541 ↗
16. Najafi · PLoS One · 2015 · 10 · e013213210.1371/journal.pone.0132132 ↗
17. Granick · J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. · 2003 · 41 · 275510.1002/polb.10669 ↗
18. Jones · Nature · 1999 · 400 · 14610.1038/22080 ↗
19. Bode · Nanoscale · 2011 · 3 · 237610.1039/c0nr01013h ↗
20. Grünberg · Nucleic Acids Res. · 2010 · 38 · 266310.1093/nar/gkq139 ↗
21. Maity · Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. · 2015 · 25 · 8810.1016/j.cbpa.2014.12.026 ↗
22. Sullivan · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2004 · 116 · 428610.1002/ange.200460271 ↗
23. Xu · Eur. Polym. J. · 2015 · 65 · 1510.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.11.037 ↗
24. Zhou · Annu. Rev. Biophys. · 2008 · 37 · 37510.1146/annurev.biophys.37.032807.125817 ↗
25. Zhou · Arch. Biochem. Biophys. · 2008 · 469 · 7610.1016/j.abb.2007.07.013 ↗
26. A. Dhar , Protein folding in crowded environments and living cells, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2011
27. Zhou · J. Mol. Recognit. · 2004 · 17 · 36810.1002/jmr.711 ↗
28. Lu · Biophys. J. · 2006 · 90 · 322410.1529/biophysj.105.071761 ↗
29. Caraglio · Phys. Biol. · 2012 · 9 · 01600610.1088/1478-3975/9/1/016006 ↗
30. Lucent · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2007 · 104 · 1043010.1073/pnas.0608256104 ↗
31. Mashinchian · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2014 · 6 · 1328010.1021/am503045b ↗
32. Fathizadeh · J. Chem. Phys. · 2013 · 139 · 04491210.1063/1.4816626 ↗
33. Mashaghi · Structure · 2014 · 22 · 122710.1016/j.str.2014.06.015 ↗
34. Mashaghi · RSC Adv. · 2015 · 5 · 5168210.1039/C5RA08106H ↗
35. Mashaghi · Soft Matter · 2015 · 11 · 657610.1039/C5SM01482D ↗
36. Nikoofard · Nanoscale · 2016 · 8 · 464310.1039/C5NR08828C ↗
37. Mugler · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2014 · 16 · 2253710.1039/C4CP03402C ↗
38. Plaxco · J. Mol. Biol. · 1998 · 277 · 98510.1006/jmbi.1998.1645 ↗
39. Öztop · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2004 · 93 · 20810510.1103/PhysRevLett.93.208105 ↗
40. Mohazab · PLoS One · 2013 · 8 · e5364210.1371/journal.pone.0053642 ↗
41. Ivankov · Protein Sci. · 2003 · 12 · 205710.1110/ps.0302503 ↗
42. Meluzzi · Nucleic Acids Res. · 2012 · 41 · 6310.1093/nar/gks1029 ↗
43. Plimpton · J. Comput. Phys. · 1995 · 117 · 110.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
44. Makarov · Phys. Rev. E: Stat. Phys., Plasmas, Fluids, Relat. Interdiscip. Top. · 2002 · 66 · 01190810.1103/PhysRevE.66.011908 ↗
45. Szabo · J. Chem. Phys. · 1980 · 72 · 435010.1063/1.439715 ↗
46. P. J. Flory , Statistical Mechanics of Chain Molecules, Hanser, New York, 1989, pp. 401–403
47. Smrek · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2017 · 118 · 09800210.1103/PhysRevLett.118.098002 ↗
48. Heidari · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2017 · 19 · 1838910.1039/C7CP02145C ↗
49. J.-P. Sauvage and C.Dietrich-Buchecker, Molecular catenanes, rotaxanes and knots: a journey through the world of molecular topology, John Wiley & Sons, 2008