Insights into the interparticle mixing of CsPbBr 3 and CsPbI 3 nanocubes: halide ion migration and kinetics
Source abstract
Abstract
Anion exchange of CsPbX3 nanocrystals (NCs) is an easy pathway to tune the bandgap over the entire visible region. Even the mixing of pre-synthesized CsPbBr3 and CsPbI3 NCs at room temperature leads to the formation of mixed halide CsPbBr3-xIx NCs. Understanding the reaction mechanism and the kinetics of interparticle mixing is essential for fundamental aspects and device applications. Here, we probed the kinetics of ion migration through time-dependent steady-state photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy. We found three primary PL peaks after the mixing of NCs-bromide side peak, iodide side peak, and a new peak that emerges during the reaction. The reaction follows first-order kinetics and the activation energy is 0.75 ± 0.05 eV. We propose that the free oleylammonium halides which are in dynamic equilibrium with the NCs, eventually promote interparticle mixing that follows the anion migration from the surface to the core of the nanocrystal, which is the rate-limiting step. Overall, the inherent reaction rate between the halide anions and the nanocrystals governs the reaction kinetics.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Optical properties and cooling technologies in crystalline materials · Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Centre for Nano and Soft Matter Sciences
Jalahalli
India-560013
Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE)
Manipal
Surface Physics & Materials Science Division
Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics
Kolkata
India-700064
Funding
Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Song · Adv. Mater. · 2015 · 27 · 716210.1002/adma.201502567 ↗
2. Koscher · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2017 · 139 · 656610.1021/jacs.7b02817 ↗
3. Huang · ACS Energy Lett. · 2017 · 2 · 207110.1021/acsenergylett.7b00547 ↗
4. Zhang · Chem. Commun. · 2016 · 52 · 1363710.1039/C6CC06425F ↗
5. Nedelcu · Nano Lett. · 2015 · 15 · 563510.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02404 ↗
6. Wang · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2019 · 58 · 1669110.1002/anie.201910800 ↗
7. Li · Nano Energy · 2020 · 71 · 10463410.1016/j.nanoen.2020.104634 ↗
8. Ahmad · J. Alloys Compd. · 2017 · 705 · 82810.1016/j.jallcom.2017.02.147 ↗
9. Xing · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2016 · 18 · 3048410.1039/C6CP06496E ↗
10. Elmelund · ACS Energy Lett. · 2019 · 4 · 196110.1021/acsenergylett.9b01280 ↗
11. Koscher · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2016 · 138 · 1206510.1021/jacs.6b08178 ↗
12. Hazarika · ACS Nano · 2018 · 12 · 1032710.1021/acsnano.8b05555 ↗
13. Akkerman · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2015 · 137 · 1027610.1021/jacs.5b05602 ↗
14. Ravi · ACS Energy Lett. · 2018 · 3 · 104910.1021/acsenergylett.8b00380 ↗
15. Protesescu · Nano Lett. · 2015 · 15 · 369210.1021/nl5048779 ↗
16. Swarnkar · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2015 · 54 · 1542410.1002/anie.201508276 ↗
17. De Roo · ACS Nano · 2016 · 10 · 207110.1021/acsnano.5b06295 ↗
18. Fu · Chem. Mater. · 2017 · 29 · 838510.1021/acs.chemmater.7b02948 ↗
19. Brennan · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2017 · 139 · 1220110.1021/jacs.7b05683 ↗
20. Creutz · Nano Lett. · 2018 · 18 · 111810.1021/acs.nanolett.7b04659 ↗
21. Cottingham · Chem. Mater. · 2016 · 28 · 757410.1021/acs.chemmater.6b03553 ↗
22. Haque · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2018 · 122 · 1339910.1021/acs.jpcc.7b11118 ↗
23. van der Burgt · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2018 · 122 · 1570610.1021/acs.jpcc.8b02699 ↗
24. Mehetor · ACS Energy Lett. · 2019 · 4 · 143710.1021/acsenergylett.9b01028 ↗
25. Soetan · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2017 · 121 · 1818610.1021/acs.jpcc.7b03939 ↗
26. Li · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2014 · 136 · 1204710.1021/ja5057032 ↗
27. Santra · Chem. Mater. · 2016 · 28 · 707210.1021/acs.chemmater.6b03076 ↗
28. Li · RSC Adv. · 2016 · 6 · 7831110.1039/C6RA17008K ↗
29. Ai · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2017 · 19 · 1734910.1039/C7CP02482G ↗
30. Zhao · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 905810.1021/nn303217q ↗
31. Eames · Nat. Commun. · 2015 · 6 · 749710.1038/ncomms8497 ↗
32. Lee · ACS Energy Lett. · 2017 · 2 · 94310.1021/acsenergylett.7b00150 ↗
33. Yoon · ACS Energy Lett. · 2017 · 2 · 150710.1021/acsenergylett.7b00357 ↗
34. Azpiroz · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2015 · 8 · 211810.1039/C5EE01265A ↗
35. Domanski · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2017 · 10 · 60410.1039/C6EE03352K ↗
36. Walsh · ACS Energy Lett. · 2018 · 3 · 198310.1021/acsenergylett.8b00764 ↗
37. Peng · ACS Energy Lett. · 2018 · 3 · 147710.1021/acsenergylett.8b00641 ↗
38. Ravi · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2017 · 8 · 498810.1021/acs.jpclett.7b02192 ↗
39. Peng · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2019 · 141 · 1616010.1021/jacs.9b09157 ↗
40. Dutta · ACS Energy Lett. · 2018 · 3 · 32910.1021/acsenergylett.7b01226 ↗