Textile Wastewater Treatment Through Plant–Microbe Synergism in a Floating Treatment Wetland System
Source abstract
Abstract
Textile wastewater treatment is a complex process that requires a range of chemicals and generates hazardous sludge. This article evaluates a chemical-free, floating treatment wetlands system for the treatment of textile wastewater containing reactive red and reactive yellow dyes. Two aquatic plants, Eichhornia crassipes Solms and Pistia stratiotes L., were selected and vegetated in the system. The efficacy of the system was enhanced by inoculation of two pollutant-degrading and plant growth-promoting bacteria: Bacillus cereus and Bacillus subtilis. The eight treatments were designed with different combinations of plants and bacteria. The performance of the system was evaluated through key parameters of electrical conductivity, total dissolved solid, total suspended solids, biological oxygen demand, chemical oxygen demand, and dye concentration for the treated wastewater. The best treatment achieved the optimized plant–bacteria synergism and exhibited good reductions in the physicochemical parameters and the values of all the wastewater parameters were within the limits set in the standards of National Environmental Quality Standards and Zero Discharge of Hazardous Chemicals Program.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment · Enzyme-mediated dye degradation · Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Fibre and Textile Technology, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan
Department of Textile Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Faisalabad, Pakistan
School of Design and Textiles, University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan
Institute of Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.14504/ajr.4.1.110.14504/ajr.4.1.1 ↗
2. 10.14504/ajr.1.2.110.14504/ajr.1.2.1 ↗
3. Shah MP · J Bioremediat Biodegrade · 2018 · 9 · 427
4. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.12453910.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124539 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.03.05110.1016/j.biortech.2009.03.051 ↗
6. 10.1186/s40643-017-0153-910.1186/s40643-017-0153-9 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.cej.2013.07.11010.1016/j.cej.2013.07.110 ↗
8. 10.1007/s11274-004-5957-z10.1007/s11274-004-5957-z ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ibiod.2012.06.02310.1016/j.ibiod.2012.06.023 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jes.2016.01.03310.1016/j.jes.2016.01.033 ↗
11. 10.5897/AJB09.137410.5897/AJB09.1374 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.07.03710.1016/j.biortech.2009.07.037 ↗
13. 10.1007/s11270-015-2505-410.1007/s11270-015-2505-4 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.08.09910.1016/j.biortech.2009.08.099 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.seppur.2014.08.01710.1016/j.seppur.2014.08.017 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.12.01010.1016/j.biortech.2007.12.010 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.procbio.2004.06.00710.1016/j.procbio.2004.06.007 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.watres.2015.06.04610.1016/j.watres.2015.06.046 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.03.09410.1016/j.biortech.2011.03.094 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.01.08910.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.01.089 ↗
21. 10.1007/s11356-011-0679-x10.1007/s11356-011-0679-x ↗
22. 10.1007/s00425-009-0980-910.1007/s00425-009-0980-9 ↗
23. 10.1080/15226514.2014.100378710.1080/15226514.2014.1003787 ↗
24. 10.1080/02772248.2014.97055610.1080/02772248.2014.970556 ↗
25. 10.1080/15226514.2016.118356710.1080/15226514.2016.1183567 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.02.01310.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.02.013 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.07.02510.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.07.025 ↗
28. 10.1080/15226514.2015.108582910.1080/15226514.2015.1085829 ↗
29. Rafique HM · 2015
30. Rafique HM · Pak J Agric Sci · 2015 · 52 · 905
31. 10.1007/BF0015262410.1007/BF00152624 ↗
32. 10.1139/m94-16210.1139/m94-162 ↗