Antibacterial activity of ZnO nanoflowers deposited on biodegradable acrylic acid hydrogel by chemical bath deposition
Source abstract
Abstract
In the first part of this study, acrylic acid (AA) hydrogels were produced by a free radical reaction. Chemical and morphological structures of AA-hydrogels were specified by using Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) techniques. In the second part of the study, ZnO nanoflowers were synthesized on the AA-hydrogel by using a chemical bath deposition (CBD) technique for the first time in the literature. The AA-hydrogel acted as the substrate in the CBD process. The deposition time effect on the morphological properties of ZnO nanoflowers was determined by applying SEM. According to the SEM results, the deposition time in the production of ZnO nanoflowers has played a vital role in the surface morphology. Chemical, morphological and thermal properties of the ZnO nanoflowers were determined by applying FT-IR, scanning electron microscopy-energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy and thermogravimetric analysis techniques. Elemental mapping of ZnO nanostructures was carried out using SEM. The antibacterial activity of the ZnO nanoflower-deposited AA-hydrogel was determined against Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. Escherichia coli (E. coli) and Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) were used as test microorganisms. Gram-negative bacteria were more resistant to hydrogels and ZnO nanoflowers compared to Gram-positive bacteria.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications · Polymer Nanocomposite Synthesis and Irradiation · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Matei A, Cernica I, Cadar O, Roman C and Schiopu V 2008 Int. J. Mater. Form. 1 76710.1007/s12289-008-0288-5 ↗
2. Priyanka G, Brian P, David W B, Wenjie H, William P J and Anne J A 2009 J. Biol. Eng. 3 110.1186/1754-1611-3-1 ↗
3. Emami-Karvani Z and Chehrazi P 2011 Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 5 1368
4. Rai M, Yadav A and Gade A 2009 Biotechnol. Adv. 27 7610.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.09.002 ↗
5. Rizwan W, Young-Soon K, Amrita M, Soon-Il Y and Hyung-Shik S 2010 J. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 5 167510.1007/s11671-010-9694-y ↗
6. Sawai J and Yoshikawa T 2003 J. Microbiol. Methods 54 17710.1016/S0167-7012(03)00037-X ↗
7. Roselli M, Finamore A, Garaguso I, Britti M S and Mengheri E 2003 J. Nutr. 133 407710.1093/jn/133.12.4077 ↗
8. Mohsen J and Zahra B 2008 Afr. J. Biotechnol. 7 4926
9. Laura K A, Delina Y L and Pedro J J A 2006 J. Water Resour. 40 3527
10. Sobha K, Surendranath K, Meena V, Jwala K T, Swetha N and Latha K S M 2010 J. Biotechnol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 5 1
11. Reddy K M, Kevin F, Jason B, Denise G W, Cory H and Alex P 2007 J. Appl. Phys. Lett. 90 1
12. Wahid F, Yin J J, Xue D D, Xue H, Lu Y S, Zhong C et al 2016 Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 88 27310.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.03.044 ↗
13. Kalyani G, Anil V G, Bo-Jung C and Yong-Chien L 2006 J. Green Chem. 8 103410.1039/b605623g ↗
14. Dobrucka R and Długaszewska J 2016 Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 23 51710.1016/j.sjbs.2015.05.016 ↗
15. Gunalan S, Sivaraj R and Rajendran V 2012 Prog. Nat. Sci.: Mater. Int. 22 69310.1016/j.pnsc.2012.11.015 ↗
16. Talebian N, Amininezhad S M and Doudi M 2013 J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 120 6610.1016/j.jphotobiol.2013.01.004 ↗
17. Karunakaran C, Rajeswari V and Gomathisankar P 2011 Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 14 13310.1016/j.mssp.2011.01.017 ↗
18. Gokmen F O and Bayramgil N P 2017 Eur. Chem. Bull. 6 51410.17628/ecb.2017.6.514-518 ↗
19. Temel S, Gokmen F O and Yaman E 2017 Eur. Sci. J. 13 28
20. Temel S, Gokmen F O and Yaman E 2017 Int. J. Curr. Adv. Res. 6 4646
21. Zhang L, Jiang Y, Ding Y, Daskalakis N, Jeuken L, Povey M et al 2010 J. Nanopart. Res. 12 162510.1007/s11051-009-9711-1 ↗
22. Dincă V, Mocanu A, Isopencu G, Busuioc C, Brajnicov S, Vlad A et al 2018 Arab. J. Chem. (in press)