Quantitative structure-property relationships of electroluminescent materials: Artificial neural networks and support vector machines to predict electroluminescence of organic molecules
Source abstract
Abstract
Electroluminescent compounds are extensively used as materials for application in OLED. In order to understand the chemical features related to electroluminescence of such compounds, QSPR study based on neural network model and support vector machine was developed on a series of organic compounds commonly used in OLED development. Radial-basis function-SVM model was able to predict the electroluminescence with good accuracy (R = 0·90). Moreover, RMSE of support vector machine model is approximately half of RMSE observed for artificial neural networks model, which is significant from the point of view of model precision, as the dataset is very small. Thus, support vector machine is a good method to build QSPR models to predict the electroluminescence of materials when applied to small datasets. It was observed that descriptors related to chemical bonding and electronic structure are highly correlated with electroluminescence properties. The obtained results can help in understating the structural features related to the electroluminescence, and supporting the development of new electroluminescent materials.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research · Conducting polymers and applications · Advanced Computing and Algorithms
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Akcelrud L 2003 Prog. Polym. Sci. 28 87510.1016/S0079-6700(02)00140-5 ↗
2. Chen C T 2004 Chem. Mater. 16 438910.1021/cm049679m ↗
3. Fourches D, Pu D, Tassa C, Weissleder R, Shaw S Y, Mumper R J, Tropsha A 2010 ACS Nano 4 570310.1021/nn1013484 ↗
4. Gasteiger J, Sadowski J, Schuur J, Selzer P, Steinhauer L and Steinhauer V 1996 J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 36 103010.1021/ci960343+ ↗
5. Hall M, Frank E, Holmes G, Pfahringer G, Reutmann P and Witten I H 2009 The WEKA data mining Software: An Update. SIGKDD Explorations 1110.1145/1656274.1656278 ↗
6. Han I-S, Han C and Chung C-B 2005 J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 95 96710.1002/app.20979 ↗
7. Jun Qi, Wei J, Sun C and Pan T 2011 Front. Earth. Sci. 5 245
8. Juna Q, Chang-Honga S and Jiac W 2010 Proc. Env. Sci. 2 142910.1016/j.proenv.2010.10.156 ↗
9. Mi B X et al 2002 J. Mater. Chem. 12 130710.1039/b110153f ↗
10. Morril J A and Byrd E F C 2008 J. Mol. Graph. Model 27 34910.1016/j.jmgm.2008.06.003 ↗
11. Shahbazikhah P, Asadollahi-Baboli M, Khaksar R, Alamdaria R F, Zare-Shahabadic V 2011 J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 22 144610.1590/S0103-50532011000800007 ↗
12. Smola A J and Schölkopf B 2004 Stat. Comput. 14 19910.1023/B:STCO.0000035301.49549.88 ↗
13. So K H, Park H-T, Shin S C, Lee S G, Lee D H, Oh H Y, Kwon S K, Kim Y-H 2009 Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 30 161110.5012/bkcs.2009.30.7.1611 ↗
14. Taherpour A 2009 Chem. Phys. Lett. 483 23310.1016/j.cplett.2009.10.075 ↗
15. Tetko I V et al 2005 J. Comp. Aid. Mol. Des. 19 45310.1007/s10822-005-8694-y ↗
16. Todeschini R and Consonni V 2009 Molecular descriptors for chemoinformatics (Wiley-VCH: Weinheim)10.1002/9783527628766 ↗
17. Wen S-W, Lee M-T and Chen C H 2005 J. Disp. Technol. 1 9010.1109/JDT.2005.852802 ↗
18. Xu J, Wang L, Wang L U, Shen X and Xu W 2011 J. Comp. Chem. 12 1
19. Xue C and Luo F T 2003 Tetrahedron 59 519310.1016/S0040-4020(03)00783-X ↗
20. Yu X 2010 Fiber Polym. 11 75710.1007/s12221-010-0757-6 ↗
21. Yu X, Yi B, Yu W and Wang X 2008 Chem. Papers 62 62310.2478/s11696-008-0066-3 ↗