journal article·2021-09

Nickel sulphide flakes improved cone-shaped graphite electrode for high-performance OER activity

Haydar Ali, Santu Ghosh, Avijit Mondal

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 44· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

The performance of electrochemical water splitting is very much affected by the sluggishness of oxygen evolution reaction (OER) process. Therefore, design and development of low cost, stable and active catalyst for OER process is a challenging issue. In this study we have used cone-shaped pencil graphite (PG), which is commonly used for writing purpose, as anode followed by modification by two-dimensional (2D) nickel sulphide flakes for electrochemical OER in alkaline medium. The dispersed flakes gradually attached to the cone-shaped graphite pencil surface via interaction with exposed graphite sheets along with formation of porous network around the electrode surface via assembly of the flakes. The modified electrocatalyst were well characterized using X-ray diffraction, Raman, field emission scanning electron microscopy, energy dispersive X-ray, inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy and electrochemical techniques. We have observed that the electrocatalytic activity and stability of the newly designed anode is far greater than standard IrO2 catalyst-modified PG in alkaline medium and comparable with newly reported Ni-based catalysts modified electrode in literature. The unique shape and porous network facilitate mass diffusion process preventing larger bubble formation. Overall, the approach is very simple and cost effective.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Advanced battery technologies research · Fuel Cells and Related Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. Jiao Y, Zheng Y, Jaroniec M and Qiao S Z 2015 Chem. Soc. Rev. 44 206010.1039/C4CS00470A ↗
2. Roger I, Shipman M A and Symes M D 2017 Nat. Rev. 1 1
3. You B and Sun Y 2018 Acc. Chem. Res. 51 157110.1021/acs.accounts.8b00002 ↗
4. Hou J, Wu Y, Zhang B, Cao S, Li Z and Sun L 2019 Adv. Funct. Mater. 29 180836710.1002/adfm.201808367 ↗
5. Hu C, Zhang L and Gong J 2019 Energy Environ. Sci. 12 262010.1039/C9EE01202H ↗
6. Atkins P and de Paula J 2009 Physical chemistry 9th edn (Oxford: W H Freeman)
7. Castellan G W 1983 Physical chemistry (3rd edn) Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.
8. Lee Y, Suntivich J, May K J, Perry E E and Shao-Horn Y 2012 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 3 39910.1021/jz2016507 ↗
9. Pfeifer V, Jones T E, Vélez J J V, Arrigo R, Piccinin S, Hävecker M et al 2017 Chem. Sci. 8 214310.1039/C6SC04622C ↗
10. Luan C, Liu G, Liu Y, Yu L, Wang Y, Xiao Y et al 2018 ACS Nano 12 387510.1021/acsnano.8b01296 ↗
11. Shen L, Yu L, Wu H B, Yu X Y, Zhang X and Lou X W 2015 Nat. Commun. 6 669410.1038/ncomms7694 ↗
12. Zhang C, Shao M, Zhou L, Li Z, Xiao K and Wei M 2016 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8 3369710.1021/acsami.6b12100 ↗
13. Wu T, Zhang S, Bu K, Zhao W, Bi Q, Lin T et al 2019 J. Mater. Chem. A 7 2206310.1039/C9TA07962A ↗
14. Dutta A, Samantara A K, Dutta S K, Jena B K and Pradhan N 2016 ACS Energy Lett. 1 16910.1021/acsenergylett.6b00144 ↗
15. Dutta S, Indra A, Feng Y, Han H and Song T 2019 Appl. Cat. B-Envs. 241 52110.1016/j.apcatb.2018.09.061 ↗
16. Tiwari A P, Yoon Y, Novak T G, An K S and Jeon S 2019 ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2 506110.1021/acsanm.9b00985 ↗
17. Wan K, Luo J, Zhou C, Zhang T, Arbiol J, Lu X et al 2019 Adv. Funct. Mater. 29 190031510.1002/adfm.201900315 ↗
18. Li Y, Bu Y, Chen X, Zhu T, Wang J, Kawi S et al 2019 Chem. Cat. Chem. 11 1320
19. Fu H Q, Zhang L, Wang C W, Zheng L R, Liu P F and Yang H G 2018 ACS Energy Lett. 3 202110.1021/acsenergylett.8b00982 ↗
20. Han C, Li W, Shu C, Guo H, Liu H, Dou S et al 2019 ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2 536310.1021/acsaem.9b00932 ↗
21. Zheng X, Han X, Zhang Y, Wang J, Zhong C, Deng Y et al 2019 Nanoscale 11 564610.1039/C8NR09902B ↗
22. Ma M, Yang G, Wang H, Lu Y, Zhang B, Cao X et al 2019 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 44 154410.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.11.176 ↗
23. Jothi P R, Salunkhe R R, Pramanik M, Kannan S and Yamauchi Y 2016 RSC Adv. 6 2124610.1039/C5RA26946F ↗
24. Krishnamoorthy D and Prakasam A 2020 Inorg. Chem. Commun. 119 10806310.1016/j.inoche.2020.108063 ↗
25. Dai Z, Geng H, Wang J, Luo Y, Li B, Zong Y et al 2017 ACS Nano 11 1103110.1021/acsnano.7b05050 ↗
26. Liu D, Du Y, Li T, Zhang H, Liu D, Zhang W et al 2020 Chem. Commun. 56 1146510.1039/D0CC04938G ↗
27. Trasatti S and Petrii O A 1991 Pure Appl. Chem. 63 71110.1351/pac199163050711 ↗
28. McCrory C C L, Jung S, Peters J C and Jaramillo T F 2013 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135 1697710.1021/ja407115p ↗
29. Sun X, Shao Q, Pi Y, Guo J and Huang X 2017 J. Mater. Chem. A 5 776910.1039/C7TA02091K ↗
30. Gao M, Sheng W, Zhuang Z, Fang Q, Gu S, Jiang J et al 2014 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136 707710.1021/ja502128j ↗
31. Thangasamy P, Maruthapandian V, Saraswathy V and Sathish M 2017 Sci. Technol. 7 3591
32. Chen J S, Ren J, Shalom M, Fellinger T and Antonietti M 2016 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8 550910.1021/acsami.5b10099 ↗
33. Wu L K, Wu W Y, Xia J, Cao H Z, Hou G Y, Tang Y P et al 2017 J. Mater. Chem. A 5 1066910.1039/C7TA02754K ↗
34. Stern L A and Hu X 2015 Faraday Discuss. 176 36310.1039/C4FD00120F ↗
35. Wang H Y, Hsu Y Y, Chen R, Chan T S, Chen H M and Liu B 2015 Adv. Energy Mater. 5 150009110.1002/aenm.201500091 ↗
36. Tahir M, Pan L, Zhang R, Wang Y C, Shen G, Aslam I et al 2017 ACS Energy Lett. 2 217710.1021/acsenergylett.7b00691 ↗
37. Trtochaud L, Young L S, Ranney J K and Boettcher S W 2014 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136 674410.1021/ja502379c ↗
38. Michael J D, Demeter E L, Illes S M, Fan Q, Boes J R and Kitchin J R 2015 J. Phys. Chem. C 119 1147510.1021/acs.jpcc.5b02458 ↗