journal article·2020-12

Mechanical and biological properties of polycaprolactone/fibrin nanocomposite adhesive produced by electrospinning method

Bahare Hushmand Shahrifi, Majid Mohammadi, Mehdi Manoochehri, Amir Atashi

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 43· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Biopolymer nanocomposites exhibit an important role in regulating cell function in tissue engineering applications. Rapid degradation and good biological activities of these nanocomposites make them suitable for use in orthopaedic and medical applications. In this study, a polycaprolactone (PCL) scaffold and fibrin glue were used as a matrix and reinforcement, respectively. PCL/fibrin nanocomposites with different aspect ratios were synthesized and used as a bioactive adhesive. The tensile strength of PCL/fibrin was measured using a tensile machine-equipped polymer load cell. Microstructural analysis of PCL and PCL/fibrin nanocomposites was investigated by field emission scanning electron microscopy. Microstructure results showed suitable porosity with proper distribution and size in the PCL–fibrin nanocomposites with a 1/10 aspect ratio. The results of wettability showed that fibrin as reinforcement in PCL decreased the contact angle and improved hydrophilic properties. The adhesion properties of PCL and PCL/fibrin scaffolds were determined by the $$4^\prime $$ , 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole test. Mesenchymal stem cells were cultured on the PCL and PCL/fibrin scaffolds. The results showed more and better adhesion of cells on the PCL/fibrin adhesive. A 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide test was performed on the scaffolds to determine cell viability and biocompatibility. The statistical results confirmed that the cell growth is higher on the PCL/fibrin after 4 days.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Polymer Surface Interaction Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Basiri Z, Rezayan A H, Akbari B, Aghdam R M and Tafti H A 2018 React. Funct. Polym.127 8510.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2018.04.004 ↗
2. Croisier F, Duwez A S, Jérôme C, Léonard A F, van der Werf K O, Dijkstra P J et al 2012 Acta Biomater.8 21810.1016/j.actbio.2011.08.015 ↗
3. Zhu W, Chuah Y J and Wang D A 2018 Acta Biomater.74 110.1016/j.actbio.2018.04.034 ↗
4. Sarasam A and Madihally S V 2005 Biomaterials26 550010.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.01.071 ↗
5. Burks S and Spotnitz W 2014 AORN J.100 16010.1016/j.aorn.2014.01.026 ↗
6. Roque L, Castro P, Molpeceres J, Viana A S, Roberto A, Reis C et al 2018 Eur. Polym. J.104 1910.1016/j.eurpolymj.2018.04.032 ↗
7. Hwang P T, Murdock K, Alexander G C, Salaam A D, Ng J I, Lim D J et al 2016 J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A104 101710.1002/jbm.a.35614 ↗
8. Ryou M and Thompson C C 2006 Tech. Gastrointest. Endosc.8 3310.1016/j.tgie.2005.12.007 ↗
9. Duarte A P, Coelho J F, Bordado J C, Cidade M T and Gil M H 2012 Prog. Polym. Sci.37 103110.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.12.003 ↗
10. Shahrezaee M, Salehi M, Keshtkari S, Oryan A, Kamali A and Shekarchi B 2018 Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med.14 206110.1016/j.nano.2018.06.007 ↗
11. Ehterami A, Salehi M, Farzamfar S, Vaez A, Samadian H, Sahrapeyma H et al 2018 Int. J. Biol. Macromol.117 60110.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.05.184 ↗
12. Eshraghi S and Das S 2010 Acta Biomater.6 246710.1016/j.actbio.2010.02.002 ↗
13. Suchaoin W, Bonengel S, Grießinger J A, Pereira de Sousa I, Hussain S, Huck C W et al 2016 Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm.101 2510.1016/j.ejpb.2016.01.006 ↗
14. Sharma S, Gupta D, Mohanty S, Jassal M, Agrawal A K and Tandon R 2014 Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.55 89910.1167/iovs.13-12727 ↗
15. Chong E J, Phan T T, Lim I J, Zhang Y Z, Bay B H, Ramakrishna S et al 2007 Acta Biomater.3 32110.1016/j.actbio.2007.01.002 ↗
16. Eosoly S, Vrana N E, Lohfeld S, Hindie M and Looney L 2012 Mater. Sci. Eng. C32 225010.1016/j.msec.2012.06.011 ↗
17. Li H, Huang C, Jin X and Ke Q 2018 RSC Adv.8 2522810.1039/C8RA02059K ↗
18. Fadaie M, Mirzaei E, Geramizadeh B and Asvar Z 2018 Carbohydr. Polym.199 62810.1016/j.carbpol.2018.07.061 ↗
19. Jiang L, Wang L, Wang N, Gong S, Wang L, Li Q et al 2018 Appl. Surf. Sci.427 31110.1016/j.apsusc.2017.08.005 ↗
20. Torres E, Fombuena V, Vallés-Lluch A and Ellingham T 2017 Mater. Sci. Eng. C75 41810.1016/j.msec.2017.02.087 ↗
21. Jing X, Mi H-Y and Turng L-S 2017 Mater. Sci. Eng. C72 5310.1016/j.msec.2016.11.049 ↗
22. Katsogiannis K A G, Vladisavljević G T and Georgiadou S 2015 Eur. Polym. J.69 28410.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.01.028 ↗
23. Kweon H, Yoo M K, Park I K, Kim T H, Lee H C, Lee H-S et al 2003 Biomaterials24 80110.1016/S0142-9612(02)00370-8 ↗
24. Thomas V, Jose M V, Chowdhury S, Sullivan J F, Dean D R and Vohra Y K 2006 J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed.17 96910.1163/156856206778366022 ↗
25. Finlay J A, Callow M E, Ista L K, Lopez G P and Callow J A 2002 Integr. Comp. Biol.42 111610.1093/icb/42.6.1116 ↗
26. Bagher Z, Azami M, Ebrahimi-Barough S, Mirzadeh H, Solouk A, Soleimani M et al 2016 Mol. Neurobiol.53 239710.1007/s12035-015-9199-x ↗
27. Al-Ahmad A, Wiedmann-Al-Ahmad M, Fackler A, Follo M, Hellwig E, Bächle M et al 2013 Arch. Oral Biol.58 113910.1016/j.archoralbio.2013.04.011 ↗
28. Alexandros R, Willem F W, Oleksandr G, Panagiotis K, Marc M, Holger Z et al 2015 J. Clin. Exp. Phamacol.5 192
29. Yari A, Teimourian S, Amidi F, Bakhtiyari M, Heidari F, Sajedi N et al 2016 Adv. Biomater. Res.5 22
30. Dai Y, Liu G, Ma L, Wang D and Gao C 2016 J. Mater. Chem. B4 441010.1039/C6TB00681G ↗