Correlation between different characterizations and improved electrochemical performances of cuprous oxide-based nanocrystals
Source abstract
Abstract
Herein, we employed the sol–gel technique to synthesize Cu2O-based nanocrystals with Co and Na doping and co-doping, respectively. A correlation was established among several characterizations of cuprous oxide-based nanocrystals to observe their feasibility in the field of energy materials. Raman spectra typically show the formation of Cu2O, whereas, in the case of Na co-doping, it exhibits the partial presence of CuO. This form of the results prompts the conductivity of nanocrystal samples to be enhanced. According to the current–voltage measurement, the current response slightly increases as doping and co-doping concentrations rise, in which Na5% co-doped Cu2O:Co shows the optimum. Photoluminescence (PL) lifetime measurement shows increases in relative PL lifetime intensity caused by Na doping, which may be attributed to oxygen vacancies. Moreover, it is observed from the cyclic voltammetry (CV) profile that the Na and Co-doped concentration significantly enhances energy storage capability. The electrode using Na5%Cu2O:Co has shown capacitive retention of 69% after 500 GCD cycles @ 10 A g–1. This indicates the practical applicability of these developed cuprous oxide-based nanocrystals as electrode materials for improved electrochemical property. Eventually, the charge–discharge was performed at different current densities, in which specific capacitance was consistent with the CV result.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · ZnO doping and properties · Semiconductor materials and devices
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Gomez H, Ram M K, Alvi F, Vilalba P, Stefanakos E and Kumar A 2011 J. Power Sources 196 410210.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.11.002 ↗
2. Wongjom P, Tuichai W, Karaphun A, Phrompt C, Daengsakul S, Pimanpang S et al 2022 J. Phys. Chem. Solids 163 11054010.1016/j.jpcs.2021.110540 ↗
3. Majumdar D and Ghosh S 2021 J. Energy Storage 34 10199510.1016/j.est.2020.101995 ↗
4. Siddiqui H, Parra M R, Quereshi M S, Malik M M and Haque F Z 2018 J. Mater. Sci. 53 882610.1007/s10853-018-2179-6 ↗
5. Xu J and Xie Y 2021 J. Power Sources 493 22968510.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229685 ↗
6. Wei H M, Gong H B, Chen L, Zi M and CaO B Q 2012 J. Phys. Chem. C 116 1051010.1021/jp301904s ↗
7. Selvamani P S, Vijaya J J, Kennedy L J, Sarvanakumar B and Bououdina M 2020 Mater. Lett. 275 12809510.1016/j.matlet.2020.128095 ↗
8. Chen K, Song S and Xue D 2015 CrystEngComm 17 211010.1039/C4CE02340D ↗
9. Chatterjee S and Pal A J 2016 J. Phys. Chem. C 120 142810.1021/acs.jpcc.5b11540 ↗
10. Luo Z, Fu L, Zhu J, Yang W, Li D and Zhou L 2020 J. Power Sources 448 22756910.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227569 ↗
11. Kim M-C, Kim S-J, Han S-B, Kuak D-H, Hwang E-T, Kim D-M et al 2015 J. Mater. Chem. A 3 2300310.1039/C5TA05455A ↗
12. Lan X, Zhang J, Gao H and Wang T 2011 CrystEngComm 13 63310.1039/C0CE00232A ↗
13. Ozaslan D, Erken O, Gunes M and Gumus C 2020 Phys. B Condens. Matter. 580 41192210.1016/j.physb.2019.411922 ↗
14. Ravichandiran C, Sakthivelu A, Davidprabu R, Arun Kumar K D, Valanrasu S, Kathalingam A et al 2019 Thin Solid films 683 8210.1016/j.tsf.2019.05.008 ↗
15. Mahajan H and Cho S 2022 RSC Adv. 12 911210.1039/D2RA00812B ↗
16. Reddy N R, Reddy P M, Mandal T K, Yedluri A K and Joo S W 2021 J. Energy Storage 43 10330210.1016/j.est.2021.103302 ↗
17. Gong S, Liu X, Yue X, Zhu D, Qi J, Meng Q et al 2022 Mater. Chem. Phys. 283 12604610.1016/j.matchemphys.2022.126046 ↗
18. Sander T, Reindal C T, Giar M, Eifert B, Heinemann M, Heiliger C et al 2014 Phys. Rev. B 90 04520310.1103/PhysRevB.90.045203 ↗
19. Messaudi O, Elgharbi S, Bougoffa A, Mansouri M, Bardaoui A, Teka S et al 2020 Ph. Transit. 93 108910.1080/01411594.2020.1837379 ↗
20. Xu J F, Ji W, Shen Z X, Li W S, Tang S H, Ye X R et al 1999 J. Raman Spectrosc. 30 41310.1002/(SICI)1097-4555(199905)30:5<413::AID-JRS387>3.0.CO;2-N ↗
21. Gómez D A, Coello J and Maspoch S 2019 Vib. Spectrosc. 100 4810.1016/j.vibspec.2018.10.011 ↗
22. Kumar N, Limbu S, Tripathi S K and Chauhan R N 2023 Mater. Lett. 335 13381410.1016/j.matlet.2022.133814 ↗
23. Kaiser A B and Rogers S A 2004 Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 415 11510.1080/15421400490481421 ↗
24. Limbu S 2022 Bull. Mater. Sci. 45 18210.1007/s12034-022-02769-3 ↗
25. Arunodaya J and Sahoo T 2020 Mater. Res. Express 7 01640510.1088/2053-1591/ab5bf1 ↗
26. Limbu S, Singh L R and Okram G S 2020 RSC Adv. 10 3561910.1039/D0RA05433J ↗
27. Zhang W, Ma C, Fang J, Cheng J, Zhang X, Dong S et al 2013 RSC Adv. 3 248310.1039/c2ra23283a ↗
28. Silva T R, Silva V D, Ferreira L S, Araújo A J M, Morales M A, Simões T A et al 2020 Ceram. Int. 46 923310.1016/j.ceramint.2019.12.176 ↗
29. Chen S, Zhu J, Wu X, Han Q and Wang X 2010 ACS Nano 4 282210.1021/nn901311t ↗
30. Mossavifard S E, El-Kady M F, Rahmanifar M S, Kaner R B and Mousavi Mir F 2015 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7 485110.1021/am508816t ↗
31. Lv W, Li L, Mang Q and Zhang X 2020 J. Mater. Sci. 55 249210.1007/s10853-019-04129-9 ↗
32. Sahu K K, Benjamin R and Basu S 2021 ACS Omega 6 110810.1021/acsomega.0c03899 ↗
33. Vijayakumar S, Nagamuthu S and Ryu K S 2017 Electrochim. Acta 238 9910.1016/j.electacta.2017.03.178 ↗
34. Liu W, Feng Y, Sun L, Zhang Y, Wang G, Zhao L et al 2018 J. Alloys Compd. 756 6810.1016/j.jallcom.2018.05.026 ↗