journal article·2013-12

Fabrication of polystyrene/agave particle biocomposites using compression molding technique: evaluation of flammability, biodegradability, mechanical and thermal behaviour

A S SINGHA, RAJ K RANA

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 36· Issue 7
Publisher page

Abstract

Polystyrene (PS) composites reinforced with ungrafted and acrylonitrile (AN) grafted agave particles (AgP) have been prepared with 10–30% particle content by weight using compression molding technique. The composite specimens thus prepared were subjected to the evaluation of mechanical, chemical, flammability and biodegradability properties. PS composites with 20% particle loading exhibited optimum mechanical properties. AN grafted AgP/PS composites exhibited higher mechanical strength as compared to ungrafted AgP/PS composites. Further AN grafted AgP/PS composites exhibited better thermal properties and biodegradability as compared to PS matrix. Addition of fire retardant fillers such as magnesium hydroxide (Mg(OH) $2)$ and zinc borate lowered burning rate of PS composites considerably. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of tensile fracture surfaces of AN grafted AgP/PS composites showed better particle/matrix adhesion.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Ahmed E E M and Luyt A S 2012 Compos. Part. A. 43 70310.1016/j.compositesa.2011.12.011 ↗
2. Bharath K N, Swamy R P and Mohan Kumar G C 2010 Int. J. Agri. Sci. 2 1
3. Chattopadhyay S K, Singh S, Pramanik N, Niyogi U K, Khandal R K, Uppaluri R and Ghoshal A K 2011 J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 121 222610.1002/app.33828 ↗
4. Gassan J and Bledzki A K 1999 Compos. Sci. Technol. 59 1303.10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00169-9 ↗
5. Girones J, Mendez J A, Boufi S, Vilaseca F and Mutje P 2007 J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 103 370610.1002/app.25104 ↗
6. Holbery J and Houston D 2006 Min. Met. Mat. S. 58 8010.1007/s11837-006-0234-2 ↗
7. Joseph P V, Joseph K and Thomas S 1999 Compos. Sci. Technol. 59 162510.1016/S0266-3538(99)00024-X ↗
8. Khalid M, Ratnam C T, Chuah T G, Ali S and Choong T S Y 2008 Mat. Des. 29 17310.1016/j.matdes.2006.11.002 ↗
9. Maldas D and Kokta B V 1990 J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 41 18510.1002/app.1990.070410116 ↗
10. Manikandan Nair K C, Thomas S and Groeninckx G 2001 Compos. Sci. Technol. 61 251910.1016/S0266-3538(01)00170-1 ↗
11. Mohanty A K, Drzal L T and Misra M 2002 J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 16 99910.1163/156856102760146129 ↗
12. Ragoubi M, George B, Molina S, Bienaime D, Merlin A, Hiver J M and Dahoun A 2012 Compos. Part. A. 43 67510.1016/j.compositesa.2011.12.025 ↗
13. Reddy N and Yang Y 2005 Trends Biotechnol. 23 2210.1016/j.tibtech.2004.11.002 ↗
14. Reis P N B, Ferreira J A M, Antunes F V and Costa J D M 2007 Compos. Part A. 38 161210.1016/j.compositesa.2006.11.010 ↗
15. Rothom R N and Horns P R 1996 Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 54 38310.1016/S0141-3910(96)00067-5 ↗
16. Sain M, Park S H, Suhara F and Law S 2004 Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 83 36310.1016/S0141-3910(03)00280-5 ↗
17. Sapieha S, Allard P and Zang Y H 1990 J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 41 203910.1002/app.1990.070410910 ↗
18. Singha A S and Rana R K 2010 Adv. Mat. Let. 1 15610.5185/amlett.2010.6134 ↗
19. Singha A S and Rana R K 2011 Int. J. Poly. Mat. 60 72910.1080/00914037.2010.551356 ↗
20. Soderstrom G and Marklund S 2002 E.S. & T. 36 195910.1021/es010135k ↗
21. Torres F G and Cubillas M L 2005 Polym. Test 24 69410.1016/j.polymertesting.2005.05.004 ↗
22. Weyenberg V, Ivens I, Coster J, Kino A, Baetens B and Verpoest E 2003 Compos. Sci. Technol. 63 124110.1016/S0266-3538(03)00093-9 ↗
23. Zhu S and Shi W 2003 Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 80 21710.1016/S0141-3910(02)00401-9 ↗