journal article·2022-09-01

Environmentally Friendly Reactive Washing Process: A Case Study

Tuba Toprak-Cavdur, Pervin Anis, Naime Çalışkan

AATCC Journal of Research· Volume 9· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

Available and clean water resources in the world are decreasing day by day. Textiles is one of the industries that are consuming the highest volumes of water. For this reason, it is necessary to develop environmentally friendly textile processes within the scope of sustainability. Reactive dyeing is followed by a washing process consisting of many steps to remove unfixed/hydrolyzed dyes, which is the most preferred dyeing in the coloring of cotton products. A high amount of water is consumed in these processes. In this study, an alternative washing process was developed instead of the conventional reactive washing process. The baths, which were decided to be used according to the transmittance values of the washing baths after dyeing in light, medium, and dark shades, were used again as the first two baths of the next washings. Alternative washing did not have a negative effect on the quality parameters, namely washing and rubbing fastnesses. As a result, it was observed that the last two baths of the washing cycle could be used as the first two baths of the next washing cycle. In this case, it was predicted that approximately 40%−50% water savings could be achieved.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers · Textile materials and evaluations · Skin Protection and Aging

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Textile, Clothing, Footwear and Leather Department, Vocational School of Orhaneli, Bursa Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey

Faculty of Engineering, Textile Engineering Department, Bursa Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey

Funding

Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştirma Kurumu

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. Iovacchini SG, Pepper LR, Crossland B, et al 2025 sustainable cotton challenge: Second annual report 2020, 2020, https://textileexchange.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/2025_Sustainable-Cotton-Challenge-Report_20201.pdf
2. Opperskalski S, Siew S, Tan E, et al Preferred fiber & materials: Market report 2020, 2020, https://textileexchange.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Textile-Exchange_Preferred-Fiber-Material-Market-Report_2020.pdf
3. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.04.01810.1016/j.jclepro.2013.04.018 ↗
4. 10.1533/9781845692483.2.35310.1533/9781845692483.2.353 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.08.04910.1016/j.carbpol.2012.08.049 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.06.08710.1016/j.carbpol.2016.06.087 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.01710.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.017 ↗
8. 10.1533/9781845693091.4410.1533/9781845693091.44 ↗
9. 10.1108/0955622071072570210.1108/09556220710725702 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.molliq.2018.02.03410.1016/j.molliq.2018.02.034 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jece.2016.01.03610.1016/j.jece.2016.01.036 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.cis.2014.04.00210.1016/j.cis.2014.04.002 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.molliq.2016.04.11910.1016/j.molliq.2016.04.119 ↗
14. 10.1007/s11157-020-09543-z10.1007/s11157-020-09543-z ↗
15. 10.1016/j.cej.2018.12.05710.1016/j.cej.2018.12.057 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.cej.2016.02.08710.1016/j.cej.2016.02.087 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.molcata.2008.11.01410.1016/j.molcata.2008.11.014 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.molliq.2019.11217110.1016/j.molliq.2019.112171 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.molliq.2018.05.09010.1016/j.molliq.2018.05.090 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.03.04810.1016/j.apcatb.2016.03.048 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.watres.2016.04.04410.1016/j.watres.2016.04.044 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.02.01410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.02.014 ↗
23. 10.3109/10242422.2013.87341610.3109/10242422.2013.873416 ↗
24. Toprak T · J Text Eng Fash Technol · 2018 · 4 · 308
25. 10.1080/10643389.2017.139326310.1080/10643389.2017.1393263 ↗
26. 10.4025/actascitechnol.v34i1.1043410.4025/actascitechnol.v34i1.10434 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.23610.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.236 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.desal.2010.10.00710.1016/j.desal.2010.10.007 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.12.01810.1016/j.jclepro.2010.12.018 ↗
30. Shaikh MA. · Pakistan Text J · 2009 · 58 · 48
31. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.01.06310.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.01.063 ↗
32. 10.1016/S0043-1354(96)00318-110.1016/S0043-1354(96)00318-1 ↗
33. Yin H · Processes · 2019 · 7 · 1
34. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.04310.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.043 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.cej.2013.10.10110.1016/j.cej.2013.10.101 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.02710.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.027 ↗
37. 10.1007/s12221-014-0126-y10.1007/s12221-014-0126-y ↗
38. 10.1533/9780857093974.1.15010.1533/9780857093974.1.150 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.molstruc.2020.12875310.1016/j.molstruc.2020.128753 ↗