journal article·2016-12

Imaging of Dental Hard Tissue Surfaces Prepared by an Ultrashort Pulsed Laser System (USPL)

Matthias Schäper, Susanne Reimann, Matthias Frentzen, Jörg Meister

Microscopy and Microanalysis· Volume 22· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The aim of this study was to compare surface structures of laser-irradiated dental hard tissues using confocal (CFM), atomic force (AFM), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The general potential of the AFM in analyzing laser-irradiated surfaces was determined in this context. Specimens of human enamel and dentin were irradiated using an 8.6 W Nd:YVO4laser with a pulse duration of 8 ps,λCenter=1,064 nm, and a pulse repetition rate of 500 kHz. Surface topology of irradiated areas (1 mm2) was investigated using AFM, CFM, and SEM. Surface roughnessRzwas measured only with the AFM and the CFM. For non-irradiated enamel and dentin surfaces, roughnesses for CFM and AFM are in the nanometer range. However, major differences in roughness were determined for laser-prepared surfaces. For enamel,Rz(CFM)=2.33μm is much higher compared withRz(AFM)=0.09μm; in the case of dentin,Rz(CFM)=5.35μm is also much higher compared withRz(AFM)=0.093μm. Information regarding structural properties of surfaces needs real dimensions, particularly for use in dentistry. In this respect, AFM technology provides no additional results that lead to a significant improvement.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine · Dental materials and restorations · Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1089/pho.2005.23.26010.1089/pho.2005.23.260 ↗
2. 10.1007/s10103-013-1315-410.1007/s10103-013-1315-4 ↗
3. 10.1023/A:100891382893110.1023/A:1008913828931 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.01.00210.1016/j.jdent.2010.01.002 ↗
5. Santos · 2014 · 36 · 137
6. 10.1177/0895937497011004090110.1177/08959374970110040901 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.dental.2004.11.00310.1016/j.dental.2004.11.003 ↗
8. 10.1007/s10103-015-1823-510.1007/s10103-015-1823-5 ↗
9. Jandt · 2001 · 491 · 303
10. 10.1089/pho.2010.292510.1089/pho.2010.2925 ↗
11. Rief · 1997 · 276 · 1109
12. 10.1590/1678-77572013057010.1590/1678-775720130570 ↗
13. Convissar · 2015
14. Petrou · 2009 · 20 · 23
15. 10.1142/p17310.1142/p173 ↗
16. 10.1088/0957-4484/17/4/00110.1088/0957-4484/17/4/001 ↗
17. 10.1159/00008165910.1159/000081659 ↗
18. Tukey · 1977
19. In vivo caries-like lesion prevention with argon laser: Pilot study10.1089/clm.1999.17.241 ↗
20. Miranda · 2015 · 30 · 43
21. Laser-assisted cavity preparation and adhesion to erbium-lased tooth structure: Part 2. Present-day adhesion to erbium-lased tooth structure in permanent teeth
22. Sasaki · 2008 · 19 · 57
23. Roulet · 1982 · 53 · 257
24. 10.1021/jp046451d10.1021/jp046451d ↗
25. Current concepts and techniques for caries excavation and adhesion to residual dentin
26. 10.1111/omi.1213210.1111/omi.12132 ↗
27. Moldes · 2009 · 11 · 221
28. Gutknecht · 2007
29. 10.1034/j.1600-0722.2002.21281.x10.1034/j.1600-0722.2002.21281.x ↗
30. 10.1007/s10103-012-1107-210.1007/s10103-012-1107-2 ↗
31. Pelling · 2005 · 102 · 6484
32. 10.1007/s10103-014-1594-410.1007/s10103-014-1594-4 ↗
33. 10.1002/jemt.2277610.1002/jemt.22776 ↗
34. 10.3390/ijms1106252310.3390/ijms11062523 ↗
35. 10.1002/jemt.2256310.1002/jemt.22563 ↗
36. Influence of a prophylaxis paste on surface roughness of different composites, porcelain, enamel and dentin surfaces10.1055/s-0039-1698924 ↗