A Machine Learning Method for Automated In Vivo Transparent Vessel Segmentation and Identification Based on Blood Flow Characteristics
Source abstract
Abstract
In vivo transparent vessel segmentation is important to life science research. However, this task remains very challenging because of the fuzzy edges and the barely noticeable tubular characteristics of vessels under a light microscope. In this paper, we present a new machine learning method based on blood flow characteristics to segment the global vascular structure in vivo. Specifically, the videos of blood flow in transparent vessels are used as input. We use the machine learning classifier to classify the vessel pixels through the motion features extracted from moving red blood cells and achieve vessel segmentation based on a region-growing algorithm. Moreover, we utilize the moving characteristics of blood flow to distinguish between the types of vessels, including arteries, veins, and capillaries. In the experiments, we evaluate the performance of our method on videos of zebrafish embryos. The experimental results indicate the high accuracy of vessel segmentation, with an average accuracy of 97.98%, which is much more superior than other segmentation or motion-detection algorithms. Our method has good robustness when applied to input videos with various time resolutions, with a minimum of 3.125 fps.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Retinal Imaging and Analysis · Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases · Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jvcir.2018.08.01910.1016/j.jvcir.2018.08.019 ↗
2. 10.1007/11559573_9510.1007/11559573_95 ↗
3. 10.1371/journal.pone.007108910.1371/journal.pone.0071089 ↗
4. 10.1109/JBHI.2019.291293510.1109/JBHI.2019.2912935 ↗
5. 10.1109/TRO.2013.225758110.1109/TRO.2013.2257581 ↗
6. 10.1007/s11760-015-0791-310.1007/s11760-015-0791-3 ↗
7. 10.3390/jimaging501001410.3390/jimaging5010014 ↗
8. 10.1109/TIP.2010.210161310.1109/TIP.2010.2101613 ↗
9. 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.286785910.1109/ACCESS.2018.2867859 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0735-1097(16)31894-010.1016/S0735-1097(16)31894-0 ↗
11. 10.1109/JBHI.2020.299925710.1109/JBHI.2020.2999257 ↗
12. 10.1038/s41467-021-26556-610.1038/s41467-021-26556-6 ↗
13. 10.1109/ISBI.2002.102924010.1109/ISBI.2002.1029240 ↗
14. 10.1109/TMI.2018.284591810.1109/TMI.2018.2845918 ↗
15. 10.1109/TSMC.1979.431007610.1109/TSMC.1979.4310076 ↗
16. 10.1109/ICRA48506.2021.956199110.1109/ICRA48506.2021.9561991 ↗
17. 10.1109/34.5620510.1109/34.56205 ↗
18. 10.1109/ICCV.2007.440914410.1109/ICCV.2007.4409144 ↗
19. 10.1109/JBHI.2020.304206910.1109/JBHI.2020.3042069 ↗
20. 10.21037/qims-19-109010.21037/qims-19-1090 ↗
21. 10.1007/BFb005619510.1007/BFb0056195 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.infrared.2011.06.00210.1016/j.infrared.2011.06.002 ↗
23. Optics: Ordering points to identify the clustering structure
24. Chan, KG & Liebling, M (2015). Estimation of divergencefree 3D cardiac blood flow in a zebrafish larva using multi-view microscopy. In IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging. IEEE Press.10.1109/ISBI.2015.7163893 ↗
25. 10.1109/TMI.2004.82562710.1109/TMI.2004.825627 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.patcog.2013.11.01410.1016/j.patcog.2013.11.014 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.patrec.2005.11.00510.1016/j.patrec.2005.11.005 ↗
28. Fast multiscale vessel enhancement filtering
29. 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.302294310.1109/ACCESS.2020.3022943 ↗
30. 10.1109/IPTA.2019.893610110.1109/IPTA.2019.8936101 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.patcog.2019.10706810.1016/j.patcog.2019.107068 ↗
32. 10.1109/TMI.2017.267971310.1109/TMI.2017.2679713 ↗
33. 10.1109/TIP.2015.251210810.1109/TIP.2015.2512108 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.media.2019.10162310.1016/j.media.2019.101623 ↗
35. 10.1007/3-540-63167-4_4710.1007/3-540-63167-4_47 ↗
36. 10.1007/978-3-662-03039-4_1310.1007/978-3-662-03039-4_13 ↗
37. 10.1109/TBME.2017.275973010.1109/TBME.2017.2759730 ↗
38. An edge embedded marker-based watershed algorithm for high spatial resolution remote sensing image segmentation10.1109/TIP.2010.2049528 ↗
39. 10.1109/TIP.2017.278362110.1109/TIP.2017.2783621 ↗
40. 10.1038/nmeth.201910.1038/nmeth.2019 ↗
41. Zebrafish embryo vessel segmentation using a novel dual ResUNet model
42. 10.1109/TMI.2020.304280210.1109/TMI.2020.3042802 ↗
43. 10.1007/978-3-030-59722-1_7610.1007/978-3-030-59722-1_76 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2004.05.00310.1016/j.compbiomed.2004.05.003 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.12.01110.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.12.011 ↗
46. 10.1007/3-540-45103-X_5010.1007/3-540-45103-X_50 ↗
47. Menon, PG , Rochon, ER & Roman, BL (2016). In-vivo cell tracking to quantify endothelial cell migration during zebrafish angiogenesis. SPIE Medical Imaging. International Society for Optics and Photonics.10.1117/12.2217614 ↗
48. 10.1007/s10278-014-9704-110.1007/s10278-014-9704-1 ↗
49. Witten · 2011
50. Recognition of blood vessels in image of zebrafish embryo based on improved AdaBoost network